USA.com / Claysburg-Kimmel High School / Test Performance

Claysburg-Kimmel High School, Test Performance

Basic InfoStudents and TeachersTest PerformanceSchool District

Year	Test	Grade	Measurement	Score	School District	State Average
PSSA
2003	Math	11th Grade	% met std	41.4%	41.4%	N/A
2004	Math	11th Grade	% met std	36.8%	36.8%	N/A
2005	Math	11th Grade	% met std	42.5%	42.5%	N/A
2006	Math	11th Grade	% met std	30%	29.6%	N/A
2007	Math	11th Grade	% met std	31.6%	31.6%	N/A
2008	Math	11th Grade	% met std	46.5%	45.9%	N/A
2009	Math	11th Grade	% met std	50%	50%	N/A
2010	Math	11th Grade	% met std	49.2%	49.2%	N/A
2011	Math	11th Grade	% met std	41.7%	41.7%	N/A
2012	Math	11th Grade	% met std	38.5%	38.5%	N/A
2003	Reading	11th Grade	% met std	65.5%	65.5%	N/A
2004	Reading	11th Grade	% met std	48.5%	48.5%	N/A
2005	Reading	11th Grade	% met std	57.5%	57.5%	N/A
2006	Reading	11th Grade	% met std	44.3%	43.6%	N/A
2007	Reading	11th Grade	% met std	53.3%	53.3%	N/A
2008	Reading	11th Grade	% met std	63.3%	62.5%	N/A
2009	Reading	11th Grade	% met std	67.1%	67.1%	N/A
2010	Reading	11th Grade	% met std	66.1%	66.1%	N/A
2011	Reading	11th Grade	% met std	58.7%	58.7%	N/A
2012	Reading	11th Grade	% met std	49.1%	49.1%	N/A
2008	Science	11th Grade	% met std	23.1%	22.9%	N/A
2009	Science	11th Grade	% met std	25.3%	25%	N/A
2010	Science	11th Grade	% met std	9.2%	9.2%	N/A
2011	Science	11th Grade	% met std	19.1%	19.1%	N/A
2012	Science	11th Grade	% met std	26.4%	26.4%	N/A
2005	Writing	11th Grade	% met std	64.6%	64.6%	N/A
2006	Writing	11th Grade	% met std	64.7%	64.7%	N/A
2007	Writing	11th Grade	% met std	90%	90%	N/A
2008	Writing	11th Grade	% met std	94.3%	94.3%	N/A
2009	Writing	11th Grade	% met std	77.3%	77.3%	N/A
2010	Writing	11th Grade	% met std	56.9%	56.9%	N/A
2011	Writing	11th Grade	% met std	83.6%	83.6%	N/A
2012	Writing	11th Grade	% met std	64.9%	64.9%	N/A
2006	Math	7th Grade	% met std	77.9%	76.8%	N/A
2007	Math	7th Grade	% met std	66.2%	65.3%	N/A
2008	Math	7th Grade	% met std	57.4%	58.1%	N/A
2009	Math	7th Grade	% met std	80.3%	79.3%	N/A
2010	Math	7th Grade	% met std	64%	64%	N/A
2011	Math	7th Grade	% met std	69.4%	69.4%	N/A
2012	Math	7th Grade	% met std	85.3%	85.5%	N/A
2006	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	61.8%	60.8%	N/A
2007	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	63.4%	62.5%	N/A
2008	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	50%	49.2%	N/A
2009	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	78.9%	79.3%	N/A
2010	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	61.3%	61.3%	N/A
2011	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	87.7%	87.7%	N/A
2012	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	80.6%	79.4%	N/A
2003	Math	8th Grade	% met std	34.8%	34.8%	N/A
2004	Math	8th Grade	% met std	67.8%	66.6%	N/A
2005	Math	8th Grade	% met std	59.8%	59.8%	N/A
2006	Math	8th Grade	% met std	65.8%	65.8%	N/A
2007	Math	8th Grade	% met std	64.3%	64.8%	N/A
2008	Math	8th Grade	% met std	54.8%	54.6%	N/A
2009	Math	8th Grade	% met std	69.6%	68.4%	N/A
2010	Math	8th Grade	% met std	66.6%	66.6%	N/A
2011	Math	8th Grade	% met std	74.5%	74.5%	N/A
2012	Math	8th Grade	% met std	68.3%	68.3%	N/A
2003	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	58%	58%	N/A
2004	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	79.1%	77.7%	N/A
2005	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	68%	68%	N/A
2006	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	73.1%	73.1%	N/A
2007	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	75.7%	75.6%	N/A
2008	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	78.1%	76.7%	N/A
2009	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	66.1%	66.7%	N/A
2010	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	77.6%	77.6%	N/A
2011	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	85.4%	85.4%	N/A
2012	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	76.2%	76.2%	N/A
2008	Science	8th Grade	% met std	50.7%	48.6%	N/A
2009	Science	8th Grade	% met std	42.4%	42.4%	N/A
2010	Science	8th Grade	% met std	50%	50%	N/A
2011	Science	8th Grade	% met std	35.7%	35.7%	N/A
2012	Science	8th Grade	% met std	61.9%	61.9%	N/A
2006	Writing	8th Grade	% met std	54.9%	54.9%	N/A
2007	Writing	8th Grade	% met std	70.6%	70.4%	N/A
2008	Writing	8th Grade	% met std	67.1%	68%	N/A
2009	Writing	8th Grade	% met std	56.1%	56.1%	N/A
2010	Writing	8th Grade	% met std	57%	57%	N/A
2011	Writing	8th Grade	% met std	45.8%	45.8%	N/A
2012	Writing	8th Grade	% met std	60.3%	60.3%	N/A

Some data by SchoolDigger.com.

* Claysburg-Kimmel High School, Test Performance was rated 2 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.