Claysburg-Kimmel School District
Claysburg-Kimmel School District is located close to the center of Pennsylvania. Claysburg-Kimmel School District has 56.43 square miles of land area and 0.01 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Claysburg-Kimmel School District population is 5,845. Claysburg-Kimmel School District median household income is $40,886 in 2010-2014. Claysburg-Kimmel School District median house value is $104,000 in 2010-2014. On average, Claysburg-Kimmel School District is worse than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Claysburg-Kimmel School District Map, Border, and Nearby Locations
531 Bedford St
Claysburg PA, 16625, Blair County
Phone: 814-239-5141
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 881 | 865 | 858 | 872 | 907 | 915 | 928 |
English Language Learner Students: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Total Teachers: | 57.00 | 62.00 | 65.00 | 70.00 | 70.00 | 66.90 | 67.00 |
Prekindergarten: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA |
Kindergarten: | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 |
Elementary: | 27.90 | 28.00 | 30.00 | 29.50 | 29.50 | 29.70 | 31.00 |
Secondary: | 24.10 | 28.00 | 30.00 | 31.45 | 30.45 | 30.20 | 29.90 |
Ungraded: | 2.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 4.05 | 5.05 | 2.00 | 2.10 |
Total Other Staff: | 58.00 | 66.00 | 65.00 | 72.00 | 48.50 | 49.50 | 53.50 |
Instructional Aides: | 15.00 | 17.00 | 17.00 | 25.00 | 11.50 | 12.00 | 7.00 |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.00 |
District Administrators: | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrative Support: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
School Administrators: | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 |
School Administrative Support: | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 6.50 | 6.00 | 20.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | 2.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | NA |
Other Support Services: | 28.00 | 31.00 | 31.00 | 31.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 17.50 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 15.46 | 13.95 | 13.20 | 12.46 | 12.96 | 13.68 | 13.85 |
Schools
Claysburg-Kimmel Elementary School | ![]() | Kindergarten to Grade 6 | 240 Ck Elementary Dr, Claysburg PA 16625 |
Claysburg-Kimmel High School | ![]() | Grade 7 to Grade 12 | 531 Bedford St, Claysburg PA 16625 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
PSSA Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 41.4% | 49.1% |
2004 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 36.8% | 49.1% |
2005 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 42.5% | 50.9% |
2006 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 29.6% | 52% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 31.6% | 53.7% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 45.9% | 55.9% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 50% | 55.6% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 49.2% | 59.6% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 41.7% | 60.3% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 38.5% | 60% |
2003 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 65.5% | 59.2% |
2004 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 48.5% | 60.8% |
2005 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 57.5% | 65% |
2006 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 43.6% | 65.1% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 53.3% | 65.4% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 64.7% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 67.1% | 65.2% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 66.1% | 67.2% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 58.7% | 69.1% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 49.1% | 67.8% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 22.9% | 35.7% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 25% | 39.7% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 9.2% | 39.8% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 19.1% | 40.8% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 26.4% | 41.8% |
2005 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 64.6% | 69% |
2006 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 85.6% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 90% | 87.9% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.3% | 85.8% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 82.7% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 56.9% | 80.7% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 84.7% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 64.9% | 82.9% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89% | 81% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92% | 83% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 78.5% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.4% | 80.5% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.3% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 84.5% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 83.5% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 80% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75% | 68% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 55% | 69% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 73% | 72.8% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75% | 76.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.4% | 77% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 75.2% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80% | 77.2% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 74.1% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 67.9% | 77.2% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.1% | 78% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 71% | 79.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.4% | 81.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 84.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 85.2% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.5% | 82.6% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 77% | 68.1% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 61.2% | 70.1% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 67.7% | 70.1% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.5% | 72.6% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 83% | 72.9% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 75.4% | 73.3% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 75.9% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 81.5% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.1% | 83.4% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 98.1% | 81.4% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 82.9% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 82.3% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 56.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 71.2% | 61.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 79.1% | 69% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 60% | 66.9% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 71% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.9% | 73.2% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 76.7% | 73.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 74.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.3% | 76.3% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 63.2% | 73.3% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 58% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 64.2% | 62.7% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 63.9% | 64.2% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 44.6% | 60.6% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 71.1% | 60% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 44.4% | 61.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 66.6% | 64.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 64.1% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 53% | 67.3% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 56.1% | 65% |
2006 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 46.2% | 54.1% |
2007 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 65.8% | 57.3% |
2008 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 50% | 57.3% |
2009 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 52.5% | 58.1% |
2010 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 40.3% | 61.8% |
2011 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 45.3% | 67.1% |
2012 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 45.6% | 64.2% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 71.2% | 68% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 65.1% | 69.6% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 72.3% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 75.8% | 75.7% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 79% | 78% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 80.9% | 78.8% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 77.2% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 63% | 65.9% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 49.2% | 63.5% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 62.2% | 66.9% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 56.4% | 67.6% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 73% | 68.8% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 77.6% | 69.9% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 63.8% | 68.5% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 76.8% | 66.5% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 65.3% | 67.2% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 58.1% | 70.6% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.3% | 75.3% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 64% | 77.9% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 69.4% | 78.6% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.5% | 80.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 60.8% | 68.1% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 66.8% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 49.2% | 70% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.3% | 71.4% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 61.3% | 73.5% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.7% | 76% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.4% | 76% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 34.8% | 51.3% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 66.6% | 57.9% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 59.8% | 62.9% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 65.8% | 62.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 64.8% | 67.9% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 54.6% | 70.4% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 68.4% | 71.3% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 66.6% | 75.2% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 74.5% | 76.9% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 68.3% | 76.4% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 58% | 63.4% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 77.7% | 68.9% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 68% | 64.1% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 70.6% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 75.6% | 75% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.7% | 78.3% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 80.5% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 77.6% | 81.9% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 81.8% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 79.8% |
2008 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 48.6% | 52.7% |
2009 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 42.4% | 54.8% |
2010 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 50% | 57.2% |
2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 35.7% | 58.3% |
2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 61.9% | 59.7% |
2006 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 54.9% | 66.1% |
2007 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 70.4% | 71.8% |
2008 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 68% | 69.1% |
2009 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 56.1% | 71.2% |
2010 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 57% | 75.2% |
2011 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 45.8% | 73.1% |
2012 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 60.3% | 72.7% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $10,814,000 | $12,604 | $11,340,000 | $13,005 | $11,343,000 | $12,506 | |||
Federal: | $735,000 | $857 | 6.8% | $1,702,000 | $1,952 | 15.0% | $1,469,000 | $1,620 | 13.0% |
State: | $7,164,000 | $8,350 | 66.2% | $6,652,000 | $7,628 | 58.7% | $6,937,000 | $7,648 | 61.2% |
Local: | $2,915,000 | $3,397 | 27.0% | $2,986,000 | $3,424 | 26.3% | $2,937,000 | $3,238 | 25.9% |
Total Expenditures: | $10,076,000 | $11,744 | $10,420,000 | $11,950 | $10,747,000 | $11,849 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $8,853,000 | $10,318 | $9,082,000 | $10,415 | $8,697,000 | $9,589 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $5,020,000 | $5,851 | 56.7% | $5,353,000 | $6,139 | 58.9% | $5,023,000 | $5,538 | 57.8% |
Student and Staff Support: | $583,000 | $679 | 6.6% | $620,000 | $711 | 6.8% | $581,000 | $641 | 6.7% |
Administration: | $930,000 | $1,084 | 10.5% | $911,000 | $1,045 | 10.0% | $855,000 | $943 | 9.8% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $2,320,000 | $2,704 | 26.2% | $2,198,000 | $2,521 | 24.2% | $2,238,000 | $2,467 | 25.7% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $48,000 | $56 | $82,000 | $94 | $734,000 | $809 | |||
Construction: | $23,000 | $27 | $1,000 | $1 | $547,000 | $603 | |||
Total Other: | $2,000 | $2 | $40,000 | $46 | $44,000 | $49 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $499,000 | $582 | $550,000 | $631 | $585,000 | $645 | |||
Total Salary: | $4,539,000 | $5,290 | $4,783,000 | $5,485 | $4,652,000 | $5,129 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $3,235,000 | $3,770 | 71.3% | $3,419,000 | $3,921 | 71.5% | $3,322,000 | $3,663 | 71.4% |
Other Salary: | $1,304,000 | $1,520 | 28.7% | $1,364,000 | $1,564 | 28.5% | $1,330,000 | $1,466 | 28.6% |
Total Benefit: | $2,011,000 | $2,344 | $2,117,000 | $2,428 | $1,836,000 | $2,024 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $1,439,000 | $1,677 | 71.6% | $1,523,000 | $1,747 | 71.9% | $1,326,000 | $1,462 | 72.2% |
Other Benefit: | $572,000 | $667 | 28.4% | $594,000 | $681 | 28.1% | $510,000 | $562 | 27.8% |
* Claysburg-Kimmel School District was rated 1.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.