USA.com / Pennsylvania / Altoona Area / Public Schools / Claysburg-Kimmel Elementary School / Test Performance

Claysburg-Kimmel Elementary School, Test Performance

Basic InfoStudents and TeachersTest PerformanceSchool District

Year	Test	Grade	Measurement	Score	School District	State Average
PSSA
2005	Math	3rd Grade	% met std	89%	89%	81%
2006	Math	3rd Grade	% met std	92%	92%	83%
2007	Math	3rd Grade	% met std	88.5%	85.7%	78.5%
2008	Math	3rd Grade	% met std	83.4%	83.4%	80.5%
2009	Math	3rd Grade	% met std	86.3%	86.3%	81.7%
2010	Math	3rd Grade	% met std	96.1%	96.1%	84.5%
2011	Math	3rd Grade	% met std	89.2%	89.2%	83.5%
2012	Math	3rd Grade	% met std	82.8%	82.8%	80%
2005	Reading	3rd Grade	% met std	75%	75%	68%
2006	Reading	3rd Grade	% met std	55%	55%	69%
2007	Reading	3rd Grade	% met std	75.4%	73%	72.8%
2008	Reading	3rd Grade	% met std	75%	75%	76.8%
2009	Reading	3rd Grade	% met std	80.4%	80.4%	77%
2010	Reading	3rd Grade	% met std	82.9%	82.9%	75.2%
2011	Reading	3rd Grade	% met std	80%	80%	77.2%
2012	Reading	3rd Grade	% met std	61.5%	61.5%	74.1%
2006	Math	4th Grade	% met std	67.9%	67.9%	77.2%
2007	Math	4th Grade	% met std	79.1%	79.1%	78%
2008	Math	4th Grade	% met std	75.4%	71%	79.6%
2009	Math	4th Grade	% met std	88.4%	88.4%	81.8%
2010	Math	4th Grade	% met std	86.8%	86.8%	84.9%
2011	Math	4th Grade	% met std	88.2%	88.2%	85.2%
2012	Math	4th Grade	% met std	84.5%	84.5%	82.6%
2006	Reading	4th Grade	% met std	77%	77%	68.1%
2007	Reading	4th Grade	% met std	61.2%	61.2%	70.1%
2008	Reading	4th Grade	% met std	73.7%	67.7%	70.1%
2009	Reading	4th Grade	% met std	85.5%	85.5%	72.6%
2010	Reading	4th Grade	% met std	83%	83%	72.9%
2011	Reading	4th Grade	% met std	75.4%	75.4%	73.3%
2012	Reading	4th Grade	% met std	75.9%	75.9%	72.1%
2008	Science	4th Grade	% met std	98.2%	95.1%	81.5%
2009	Science	4th Grade	% met std	97.1%	97.1%	83.4%
2010	Science	4th Grade	% met std	98.1%	98.1%	81.4%
2011	Science	4th Grade	% met std	92.6%	92.6%	82.9%
2012	Science	4th Grade	% met std	91.5%	91.5%	82.3%
2003	Math	5th Grade	% met std	62.5%	62.5%	56.3%
2004	Math	5th Grade	% met std	70.7%	71.2%	61.8%
2005	Math	5th Grade	% met std	79.1%	79.1%	69%
2006	Math	5th Grade	% met std	60%	60%	66.9%
2007	Math	5th Grade	% met std	82.9%	82.9%	71%
2008	Math	5th Grade	% met std	69.3%	69.9%	73.2%
2009	Math	5th Grade	% met std	76.7%	76.7%	73.5%
2010	Math	5th Grade	% met std	72.2%	72.2%	74.4%
2011	Math	5th Grade	% met std	62.3%	62.3%	76.3%
2012	Math	5th Grade	% met std	63.2%	63.2%	73.3%
2003	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	62.5%	62.5%	58%
2004	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	63.7%	64.2%	62.7%
2005	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	63.9%	63.9%	64.2%
2006	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	44.6%	44.6%	60.6%
2007	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	71.1%	71.1%	60%
2008	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	43.5%	44.4%	61.6%
2009	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	66.6%	66.6%	64.5%
2010	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	72.2%	72.2%	64.1%
2011	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	53%	53%	67.3%
2012	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	56.1%	56.1%	65%
2006	Writing	5th Grade	% met std	46.2%	46.2%	54.1%
2007	Writing	5th Grade	% met std	65.8%	65.8%	57.3%
2008	Writing	5th Grade	% met std	49.2%	50%	57.3%
2009	Writing	5th Grade	% met std	52.5%	52.5%	58.1%
2010	Writing	5th Grade	% met std	40.3%	40.3%	61.8%
2011	Writing	5th Grade	% met std	45.3%	45.3%	67.1%
2012	Writing	5th Grade	% met std	45.6%	45.6%	64.2%
2006	Math	6th Grade	% met std	71.2%	71.2%	68%
2007	Math	6th Grade	% met std	65.1%	65.1%	69.6%
2008	Math	6th Grade	% met std	76.7%	73.1%	72.3%
2009	Math	6th Grade	% met std	76.7%	75.8%	75.7%
2010	Math	6th Grade	% met std	79%	79%	78%
2011	Math	6th Grade	% met std	80.9%	80.9%	78.8%
2012	Math	6th Grade	% met std	71.4%	71.4%	77.2%
2006	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	63%	63%	65.9%
2007	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	49.2%	49.2%	63.5%
2008	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	63.7%	62.2%	66.9%
2009	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	56.7%	56.4%	67.6%
2010	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	73%	73%	68.8%
2011	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	77.6%	77.6%	69.9%
2012	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	63.8%	63.8%	68.5%

Some data by SchoolDigger.com.

* Claysburg-Kimmel Elementary School, Test Performance was rated 2.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.