Clay Local School District
Clay Local School District is located in south Ohio. Clay Local School District has 21.62 square miles of land area and 0.47 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Clay Local School District population is 3,631. Clay Local School District median household income is $41,939 in 2010-2014. Clay Local School District median house value is $87,000 in 2010-2014. On average, Clay Local School District is worse than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Clay Local School District Map, Border, and Nearby Locations
44 Clay High St
Portsmouth OH, 45662, Scioto County
Phone: 740-354-6645
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 639 | 625 | 643 | 617 | 573 | 634 | 600 |
English Language Learner Students: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Teachers: | 41.57 | 41.52 | 36.33 | 34.83 | 38.29 | 37.50 | 36.00 |
Prekindergarten: | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | 3.96 | 3.95 | 3.99 | 2.27 | 2.58 | 2.50 | 2.30 |
Elementary: | 14.24 | 15.14 | 14.45 | 13.90 | 14.88 | 14.80 | 15.50 |
Secondary: | 15.87 | 16.35 | 15.89 | 16.66 | 18.83 | 18.20 | 18.20 |
Ungraded: | 5.50 | 4.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Total Other Staff: | 53.72 | 43.46 | 41.76 | 39.51 | 38.32 | 39.50 | 35.00 |
Instructional Aides: | 7.10 | 7.35 | 6.35 | 6.35 | 6.60 | 6.00 | 3.00 |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 2.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
District Administrators: | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
District Administrative Support: | 2.08 | 2.08 | 1.88 | 1.88 | 1.22 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
School Administrators: | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
School Administrative Support: | 3.50 | 4.25 | 3.75 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
Student Support Services: | 8.78 | 9.28 | 7.78 | 6.28 | 6.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 |
Other Support Services: | 26.26 | 14.50 | 14.00 | 14.00 | 14.50 | 14.50 | 13.00 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 15.37 | 15.05 | 17.70 | 17.71 | 14.96 | 16.91 | 16.67 |
Schools
Clay Elementary School | ![]() | Prekindergarten to Grade 5 | 44 Clay High St, Portsmouth OH 45662 |
Clay High School | ![]() | Grade 9 to Grade 12 | 44 Clay High St, Portsmouth OH 45662 |
Clay Middle School | ![]() | Grade 6 to Grade 8 | 44 Clay High St, Portsmouth OH 45662 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
OAA Test | |||||
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68.2% | 70.4% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 64% | 74.9% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 84% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 79.3% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 81.3% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.5% | 76.9% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 82% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 79.8% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 78.3% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.5% | 78.2% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68.2% | 77.3% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 64% | 75.1% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 65.3% | 76% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80% | 77.4% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 70.8% | 77.4% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 76.4% | 78.4% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 79.9% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.6% | 79% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 67.5% | 81.4% |
2004 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 65.8% |
2005 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 68.3% | 65.5% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 76.9% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 65.3% | 76% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 64% | 74.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.9% | 78.4% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 84% | 76.2% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 78.1% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 78.4% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 77.6% |
2004 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 70.8% |
2005 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 76.6% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.5% | 76.8% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 80% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 86% | 81.1% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.3% | 82% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 76% | 81% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 83.8% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 83.3% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 87.7% |
2004 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 78.6% |
2005 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 78.1% |
2006 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 85.9% |
2007 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 82% |
2008 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 78% | 81.7% |
2009 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 84.4% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 54.3% | 62.7% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 61.1% | 61% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 32.6% | 61.8% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 43.8% | 62.3% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 59.5% | 67% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 66.1% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.9% | 67.5% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 63.0% | 68.3% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 76.9% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 75.3% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 75% | 80% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 60.9% | 72.7% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 72% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 70.3% | 71.8% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 63% | 74.1% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.3% | 76.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 74.2% |
2007 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.4% | 68% |
2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 56.5% | 66.4% |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 64.6% | 70.6% |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 67.6% | 69.9% |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 70.4% | 71.1% |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.8% | 72.5% |
2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 67.6% |
2007 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 63.9% | 57% |
2008 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 45.7% | 64.8% |
2009 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 47.9% | 61.6% |
2004 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 74.4% | 65.6% |
2005 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 62.5% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 68.3% | 68.4% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 63% | 74% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 85% | 76.6% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 75.2% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 77.4% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 77.5% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 78.3% | 79.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 73.3% | 74.7% |
2004 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 64.6% |
2005 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 71.8% | 69.8% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 80.5% | 83.6% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 71.7% | 78% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 80% | 79.7% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 72.5% | 81.3% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 80.4% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 85.6% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 78.3% | 86.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 82.8% |
2005 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 40% | 58.5% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 43.6% | 63.2% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 57.9% | 71% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 54.3% | 68.8% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 74.3% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 60% | 71.1% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 69.6% | 74.8% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 73.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 69.0% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 78.9% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 68.4% | 77% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 77.3% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 76.6% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 64% | 80.2% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 69.6% | 77.3% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 79.5% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.3% | 81% |
2007 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.7% | 81% |
2008 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 85.7% |
2009 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 80.5% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 60.1% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 58.1% | 68.6% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 62.2% | 71% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.5% | 72.8% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 59.5% | 70.6% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 75% | 69.2% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 74.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 67.4% | 79.6% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 67.6% | 76.6% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 78.9% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 77.1% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 80% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 79.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 73% | 72.4% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80.9% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 75% | 85.1% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.7% | 83% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 85.7% |
2007 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 54.1% | 62% |
2008 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 67.6% | 62.2% |
2009 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 54.1% | 62.8% |
2010 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 50% | 64.8% |
2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 47.9% | 67.4% |
2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 41.9% | 71.5% |
2013 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 54.1% | 68.6% |
2007 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 48.6% | 49% |
2008 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 53.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 21.6% | 51.1% |
OGT Test | |||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.6% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.8% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.2% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.4% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 96% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.7% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.6% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 57.1% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 71.9% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.0% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.6% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 90% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.2% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.0% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.3% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 79.5% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.6% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.3% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $7,251,000 | $11,277 | $16,984,000 | $27,527 | $13,983,000 | $24,403 | |||
Federal: | $730,000 | $1,135 | 10.1% | $823,000 | $1,334 | 4.8% | $812,000 | $1,417 | 5.8% |
State: | $4,085,000 | $6,353 | 56.3% | $13,628,000 | $22,088 | 80.2% | $10,428,000 | $18,199 | 74.6% |
Local: | $2,436,000 | $3,788 | 33.6% | $2,533,000 | $4,105 | 14.9% | $2,743,000 | $4,787 | 19.6% |
Total Expenditures: | $14,520,000 | $22,582 | $19,156,000 | $31,047 | $7,690,000 | $13,421 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $5,594,000 | $8,700 | $5,216,000 | $8,454 | $5,366,000 | $9,365 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $3,051,000 | $4,745 | 54.5% | $2,817,000 | $4,566 | 54.0% | $2,910,000 | $5,079 | 54.2% |
Student and Staff Support: | $692,000 | $1,076 | 12.4% | $663,000 | $1,075 | 12.7% | $718,000 | $1,253 | 13.4% |
Administration: | $711,000 | $1,106 | 12.7% | $741,000 | $1,201 | 14.2% | $749,000 | $1,307 | 14.0% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $1,140,000 | $1,773 | 20.4% | $995,000 | $1,613 | 19.1% | $989,000 | $1,726 | 18.4% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $8,694,000 | $13,521 | $13,650,000 | $22,123 | $2,073,000 | $3,618 | |||
Construction: | $8,585,000 | $13,351 | $13,645,000 | $22,115 | $2,066,000 | $3,606 | |||
Total Other: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Salary: | $3,286,000 | $5,110 | $3,189,000 | $5,169 | $3,353,000 | $5,852 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $2,111,000 | $3,283 | 64.2% | $1,978,000 | $3,206 | 62.0% | $2,111,000 | $3,684 | 63.0% |
Other Salary: | $1,175,000 | $1,827 | 35.8% | $1,211,000 | $1,963 | 38.0% | $1,242,000 | $2,168 | 37.0% |
Total Benefit: | $1,174,000 | $1,826 | $1,122,000 | $1,818 | $1,130,000 | $1,972 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $704,000 | $1,095 | 60.0% | $639,000 | $1,036 | 57.0% | $653,000 | $1,140 | 57.8% |
Other Benefit: | $470,000 | $731 | 40.0% | $483,000 | $783 | 43.0% | $477,000 | $832 | 42.2% |
* Clay Local School District was rated 2 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.