Waverly Community Unit School District 6
Waverly Community Unit School District 6 is located close to the center of Illinois. Waverly Community Unit School District 6 has 95.15 square miles of land area and 0.09 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Waverly Community Unit School District 6 population is 1,885. Waverly Community Unit School District 6 median household income is $50,435 in 2010-2014. Waverly Community Unit School District 6 median house value is $78,100 in 2010-2014. On average, Waverly Community Unit School District 6 is better than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Waverly Community Unit School District 6 Map, Border, and Nearby Locations
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 396 | 406 | 395 | 401 | 389 | 384 | 384 |
English Language Learner Students: | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Teachers: | 32.00 | NA | 34.50 | 34.41 | 37.00 | 36.50 | 32.00 |
Prekindergarten: | NA | NA | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Elementary: | 19.50 | NA | 25.00 | 25.29 | 19.00 | 22.50 | 13.00 |
Secondary: | 10.50 | NA | 7.50 | 9.12 | 15.00 | 11.00 | 16.00 |
Ungraded: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 13.06 | 0.56 | 4.23 | 4.40 | 4.23 | 5.10 | 8.30 |
Instructional Aides: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 0.06 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.06 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.56 | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 1.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
District Administrators: | 0.50 | NA | 1.00 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrative Support: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
School Administrators: | 1.50 | NA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
School Administrative Support: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | NA | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.60 | 0.70 |
Other Support Services: | 10.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 4.60 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 12.38 | NA | 11.45 | 11.65 | 10.51 | 10.52 | 12.00 |
Schools
Waverly Elementary School | Prekindergarten to Grade 8 | 499 West Elm St, Waverly IL 62692 | |
Waverly High School | Grade 9 to Grade 12 | 201 North Miller St, Waverly IL 62692 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 97.1% | 75.7% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.1% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 79.3% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 85.6% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 86.7% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 85.1% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 85.2% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 77.7% | 86.4% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 87.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 53.6% | 54.8% |
2003 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 73.5% | 62.0% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80% | 65.1% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 66.6% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 73.7% | 70.7% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 72.9% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90% | 71.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 69.3% | 72.2% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81.4% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 36.6% | 58.8% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 96.3% | 84.8% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 86.4% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 96.9% | 84.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 85.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 85.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 87.7% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.0% | 88.1% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 53.8% | 60.2% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 73.7% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.7% | 73.2% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 73.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 68.9% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 59.2% |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 66.5% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 67.8% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 71.4% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 79.9% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 79.7% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.6% | 76.2% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 76.8% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 76.6% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 79.4% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.0% | 79.8% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 80.9% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 68.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 71.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 73.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.3% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 72% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.5% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 74.3% | 59.4% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 70.9% | 60.4% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.4% | 60.9% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 79.4% | 62.7% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 76.4% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 74.2% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 71.5% | 73.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 73.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 56% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 71.0% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 60.0% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 85% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 63.4% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 77.4% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 80% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.0% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 63.0% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 94.3% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 42.3% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 80% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.1% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.4% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.3% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.0% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 74.4% |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 84% | 74.6% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 94.3% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 96.9% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 46.7% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 80% | 54.4% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 54.2% | 54.3% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 75% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 61.3% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 50% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.3% | 67.1% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.4% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 78.2% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 78.1% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.9% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 51.7% | 59.8% |
PSAE Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 44.4% | 53.3% |
2004 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 35% | 53.1% |
2005 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 39.1% | 52.8% |
2006 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 68% | 53.7% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 67.7% | 52.7% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 52.1% | 53.0% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 51.6% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 40.0% | 52.7% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 41.3% | 51.3% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 41.7% | 51.6% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 40.7% | 51.8% |
2003 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 51.8% | 56.4% |
2004 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 55% | 56.8% |
2005 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 60.8% | 59.5% |
2006 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 56% | 58.4% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 61.8% | 54.0% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 60.8% | 53.3% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 57.6% | 56.9% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 56.6% | 54.0% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 58.6% | 51.1% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 27.8% | 50.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 48.1% | 54.8% |
2003 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 51.8% | 51.3% |
2004 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 60% | 52.9% |
2005 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 52.1% | 52.5% |
2006 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 44% | 50.8% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 53.0% | 51.0% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 43.4% | 51.2% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 50.5% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 43.3% | 52.4% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 34.4% | 49.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 51.7% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 37.0% | 49.4% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $4,929,000 | $12,478 | $4,941,000 | $12,322 | $5,137,000 | $13,206 | |||
Federal: | $536,000 | $1,357 | 10.9% | $197,000 | $491 | 4.0% | $608,000 | $1,563 | 11.8% |
State: | $1,957,000 | $4,954 | 39.7% | $2,053,000 | $5,120 | 41.6% | $1,784,000 | $4,586 | 34.7% |
Local: | $2,436,000 | $6,167 | 49.4% | $2,691,000 | $6,711 | 54.5% | $2,745,000 | $7,057 | 53.4% |
Total Expenditures: | $4,511,000 | $11,420 | $4,210,000 | $10,499 | $4,502,000 | $11,573 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $4,064,000 | $10,289 | $3,847,000 | $9,594 | $4,259,000 | $10,949 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $2,439,000 | $6,175 | 60.0% | $2,419,000 | $6,032 | 62.9% | $2,676,000 | $6,879 | 62.8% |
Student and Staff Support: | $285,000 | $722 | 7.0% | $189,000 | $471 | 4.9% | $263,000 | $676 | 6.2% |
Administration: | $523,000 | $1,324 | 12.9% | $501,000 | $1,249 | 13.0% | $505,000 | $1,298 | 11.9% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $817,000 | $2,068 | 20.1% | $738,000 | $1,840 | 19.2% | $815,000 | $2,095 | 19.1% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $167,000 | $423 | $119,000 | $297 | $123,000 | $316 | |||
Construction: | $94,000 | $238 | $34,000 | $85 | $6,000 | $15 | |||
Total Other: | $2,000 | $5 | $1,000 | $2 | $0 | $0 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $56,000 | $142 | $68,000 | $170 | $79,000 | $203 | |||
Total Salary: | $2,541,000 | $6,433 | $2,481,000 | $6,187 | $2,641,000 | $6,789 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $1,797,000 | $4,549 | 70.7% | $1,795,000 | $4,476 | 72.3% | $1,925,000 | $4,949 | 72.9% |
Other Salary: | $744,000 | $1,884 | 29.3% | $686,000 | $1,711 | 27.7% | $716,000 | $1,841 | 27.1% |
Total Benefit: | $727,000 | $1,841 | $677,000 | $1,688 | $756,000 | $1,943 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $481,000 | $1,218 | 66.2% | $478,000 | $1,192 | 70.6% | $552,000 | $1,419 | 73.0% |
Other Benefit: | $246,000 | $623 | 33.8% | $199,000 | $496 | 29.4% | $204,000 | $524 | 27.0% |
* Waverly Community Unit School District 6 was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.