Nashville Consolidated Community School District 49
Nashville Consolidated Community School District 49 is located in south Illinois. Nashville Consolidated Community School District 49 has 159.31 square miles of land area and 0.77 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Nashville Consolidated Community School District 49 population is 5,710. Nashville Consolidated Community School District 49 median household income is $50,038 in 2010-2014. Nashville Consolidated Community School District 49 median house value is $110,200 in 2010-2014. On average, Nashville Consolidated Community School District 49 is better than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Nashville Consolidated Community School District 49 Map and Nearby Locations
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 549 | 573 | 551 | 564 | 585 | 509 | 562 |
English Language Learner Students: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Teachers: | 37.00 | NA | 36.55 | 36.92 | 37.09 | 35.00 | 30.00 |
Prekindergarten: | NA | NA | 3.00 | 2.22 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 3.00 | 3.03 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
Elementary: | 37.00 | NA | 30.55 | 31.67 | 31.09 | 29.00 | 20.00 |
Secondary: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 4.00 |
Ungraded: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 8.00 | 17.34 | 2.80 | 4.06 | 4.00 | 3.80 | 7.80 |
Instructional Aides: | NA | 5.13 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 1.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
District Administrators: | 1.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrative Support: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
School Administrators: | 1.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
School Administrative Support: | NA | 4.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | NA | 0.80 | 1.97 | 2.00 | 1.80 | 1.80 |
Other Support Services: | 5.00 | 8.21 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 4.00 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 14.84 | NA | 15.08 | 15.28 | 15.77 | 14.54 | 18.73 |
Schools
Nashville Grade School | ![]() | Prekindergarten to Grade 8 | 750 East Gorman St, Nashville IL 62263 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 75.7% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 70.8% | 79.1% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86% | 79.3% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100% | 85.6% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 86.7% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 85.1% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.0% | 85.2% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.2% | 86.4% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 87.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.6% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 56.5% | 54.8% |
2003 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 62.0% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 65.1% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 70% | 66.6% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84% | 70.7% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81.6% | 72.9% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.8% | 71.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.7% | 72.2% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 79.0% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.9% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 77.4% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 54.8% | 58.8% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 84.8% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.2% | 86.4% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 84.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 85.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.7% | 85.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 87.7% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.7% | 88.1% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 50.9% | 60.2% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.3% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 80.4% | 73.7% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.0% | 73.2% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 69.4% | 73.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 74.6% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 66.1% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.4% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 61.8% | 59.2% |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 66.5% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 67.8% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 71.4% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.7% | 79.9% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.3% | 79.7% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 76.2% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 77.4% | 76.8% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.5% | 76.6% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 79.4% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 79.8% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 80.9% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 68.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 65.8% | 71.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 73.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.4% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.1% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 84% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 61.3% | 59.4% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 63.3% | 60.4% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 63.0% | 60.9% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.3% | 62.7% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 74.6% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 73.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 80.5% | 73.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 70.7% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.0% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 59.7% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.4% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.2% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.0% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 68.6% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 64.9% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 85% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.1% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.7% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 55.6% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.8% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.5% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.6% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 74.2% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.5% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.0% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 56.5% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.4% | 74.4% |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.3% | 74.6% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.7% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 96.3% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.0% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.7% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 50.9% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 54.4% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 62.3% | 54.3% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.2% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.5% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 52.8% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.3% | 67.1% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 93.0% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 89.1% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 75.5% | 59.8% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $4,896,000 | $8,886 | $5,240,000 | $9,291 | $4,990,000 | $8,530 | |||
Federal: | $246,000 | $446 | 5.0% | $425,000 | $754 | 8.1% | $663,000 | $1,133 | 13.3% |
State: | $1,755,000 | $3,185 | 35.8% | $1,841,000 | $3,264 | 35.1% | $1,782,000 | $3,046 | 35.7% |
Local: | $2,895,000 | $5,254 | 59.1% | $2,974,000 | $5,273 | 56.8% | $2,545,000 | $4,350 | 51.0% |
Total Expenditures: | $4,635,000 | $8,412 | $4,683,000 | $8,303 | $4,951,000 | $8,463 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $4,314,000 | $7,829 | $4,352,000 | $7,716 | $4,658,000 | $7,962 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $2,665,000 | $4,837 | 61.8% | $2,754,000 | $4,883 | 63.3% | $3,009,000 | $5,144 | 64.6% |
Student and Staff Support: | $316,000 | $574 | 7.3% | $304,000 | $539 | 7.0% | $316,000 | $540 | 6.8% |
Administration: | $494,000 | $897 | 11.5% | $481,000 | $853 | 11.1% | $485,000 | $829 | 10.4% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $839,000 | $1,523 | 19.4% | $813,000 | $1,441 | 18.7% | $848,000 | $1,450 | 18.2% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $70,000 | $127 | $88,000 | $156 | $53,000 | $91 | |||
Construction: | $10,000 | $18 | $13,000 | $23 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Other: | $30,000 | $54 | $26,000 | $46 | $28,000 | $48 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $113,000 | $205 | $152,000 | $270 | $158,000 | $270 | |||
Total Salary: | $2,501,000 | $4,539 | $2,590,000 | $4,592 | $2,588,000 | $4,424 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $1,946,000 | $3,532 | 77.8% | $1,993,000 | $3,534 | 76.9% | $2,002,000 | $3,422 | 77.4% |
Other Salary: | $555,000 | $1,007 | 22.2% | $597,000 | $1,059 | 23.1% | $586,000 | $1,002 | 22.6% |
Total Benefit: | $899,000 | $1,632 | $872,000 | $1,546 | $1,118,000 | $1,911 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $590,000 | $1,071 | 65.6% | $639,000 | $1,133 | 73.3% | $838,000 | $1,432 | 75.0% |
Other Benefit: | $309,000 | $561 | 34.4% | $233,000 | $413 | 26.7% | $280,000 | $479 | 25.0% |
* Nashville Consolidated Community School District 49 was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.