Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322
Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322 is located in east Idaho. Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322 has 173.32 square miles of land area and 1.35 square miles of water area. As of 2010, the total Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322 population is 4,971. Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322 median household income is $52,969 in 2006-2010. Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322 median house value is $156,000 in 2006-2010. On average, Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322 is better than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322 Map, Border, and Nearby Locations
105 West Center St
Sugar City ID, 83448, Madison County
Phone: 208-356-8802
Students and Teachers
| 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
| Total Students: | 1,467 | 1,438 | 1,392 |
| English Language Learner Students: | 50 | 45 | 30 |
| Total Teachers: | 79.18 | 77.10 | 75.60 |
| Prekindergarten: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Kindergarten: | 3.00 | 2.50 | 3.00 |
| Elementary: | 38.49 | 38.20 | 35.60 |
| Secondary: | 36.69 | 35.40 | 36.00 |
| Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA |
| Total Other Staff: | 60.91 | 61.00 | 65.00 |
| Instructional Aides: | 17.09 | 15.60 | 17.70 |
| Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.80 |
| Total Guidance Counselors: | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.40 |
| Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Other Guidance Counselors: | NA | NA | NA |
| Librarians/Media Specialists: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Library/Media Support: | 2.75 | 2.70 | 2.50 |
| District Administrators: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| District Administrative Support: | 2.20 | 2.20 | 2.20 |
| School Administrators: | 3.82 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| School Administrative Support: | 3.73 | 3.70 | 3.70 |
| Student Support Services: | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Other Support Services: | 26.62 | 28.10 | 29.90 |
| Student-Teacher Ratio: | 18.53 | 18.65 | 18.41 |
Schools
| Central Elementary School | ![]() | Prekindergarten to Grade 3 | 102 North Park St, Sugar City ID 83448 |
| Kershaw Intermediate School | ![]() | Grade 4 to Grade 6 | 610 East 3rd North St, Sugar City ID 83448 |
| Sugar-Salem High School | ![]() | Grade 9 to Grade 12 | 1 Digger Dr, Sugar City ID 83448 |
| Sugar-Salem Junior High School | ![]() | Grade 7 to Grade 8 | 10 North Cutler St, Sugar City ID 83448 |
| Valley View Alternative High | Grade 9 to Grade 12 | 1 Digger Dr, Sugar City ID 83448 |
Test Performance
| Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
| ISAT Test | |||||
| 2008 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.8% | 68.8% |
| 2009 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 29.2% | 40.7% |
| 2010 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.4% | 71.5% |
| 2011 | Language Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.2% | 72.6% |
| 2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.7% | 76.7% |
| 2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 25% | 44% |
| 2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.4% | 76.8% |
| 2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 78.5% |
| 2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 85.7% |
| 2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 58.5% |
| 2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 86.4% |
| 2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.2% | 87.2% |
| 2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 66.9% |
| 2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 68.6% |
| 2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 67.9% |
| 2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.4% | 69.3% |
| 2009 | Language Usage | 11th Grade | % met std | 12.5% | 26% |
| 2011 | Language Usage | 11th Grade | % met std | 18.2% | 26.4% |
| 2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 9.1% | 23% |
| 2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 36.4% | 31.6% |
| 2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 46.7% | 28.6% |
| 2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 9.1% | 38.4% |
| 2008 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 63.9% | 70% |
| 2009 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 72.8% | 73.3% |
| 2010 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 70.5% | 73.1% |
| 2011 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75% | 73.7% |
| 2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 87.5% |
| 2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.3% | 86.6% |
| 2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 87.7% |
| 2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 88.6% |
| 2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 82.7% |
| 2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 86.8% |
| 2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 88.9% |
| 2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95% | 89.2% |
| 2008 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.8% | 77.6% |
| 2009 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.7% | 80.4% |
| 2010 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 81.9% |
| 2011 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 81.1% |
| 2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 84.2% |
| 2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 85.6% |
| 2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 84.9% |
| 2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 83.4% |
| 2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.2% | 82.5% |
| 2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 86.3% |
| 2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 86.2% |
| 2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 86.7% |
| 2008 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.2% | 74.2% |
| 2009 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 77.2% |
| 2010 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.2% | 77.2% |
| 2011 | Language Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 78.7% |
| 2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.2% | 78% |
| 2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 77.9% |
| 2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 89% | 79.8% |
| 2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 80.9% |
| 2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 84.3% |
| 2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 86.5% |
| 2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89% | 88% |
| 2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 88.1% |
| 2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 60.1% |
| 2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 70.5% | 66.4% |
| 2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.5% | 64.9% |
| 2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.8% | 67.4% |
| 2008 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 71.7% |
| 2009 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 73.7% |
| 2010 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 85% | 75.1% |
| 2011 | Language Usage | 6th Grade | % met std | 84.3% | 75.4% |
| 2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 77.1% |
| 2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 78.2% |
| 2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 79.2% |
| 2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 77.5% |
| 2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 81.6% |
| 2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 85.7% |
| 2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 85.8% |
| 2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93% | 88.4% |
| 2008 | Language Usage | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.7% | 69% |
| 2009 | Language Usage | 7th Grade | % met std | 75.9% | 71.3% |
| 2010 | Language Usage | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 73.5% |
| 2011 | Language Usage | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 73.5% |
| 2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 74.8% |
| 2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.5% | 75.2% |
| 2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 78.3% | 75.3% |
| 2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 89% | 74.5% |
| 2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 80.7% |
| 2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 85.3% |
| 2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 87.4% |
| 2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 87.7% |
| 2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 58.1% | 51% |
| 2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 58.6% | 55.8% |
| 2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 58.5% | 53.7% |
| 2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 62.1% | 57.2% |
| 2008 | Language Usage | 8th Grade | % met std | 78.5% | 66.6% |
| 2009 | Language Usage | 8th Grade | % met std | 82.5% | 71.5% |
| 2010 | Language Usage | 8th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 71.8% |
| 2011 | Language Usage | 8th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 71.2% |
| 2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 78.6% |
| 2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 78.4% |
| 2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.8% | 79.9% |
| 2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 79.5% |
| 2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 88.4% |
| 2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 96% | 91.4% |
| 2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 91.3% |
| 2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 97.3% | 92.6% |
| 2010 | Language Usage | 9th Grade | % met std | 74.8% | 63.3% |
| 2011 | Language Usage | 9th Grade | % met std | 72.4% | 62.8% |
| 2010 | Math | 9th Grade | % met std | 72.9% | 69.9% |
| 2011 | Math | 9th Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 69.5% |
| 2010 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 79.1% | 80.8% |
| 2011 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 81% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
| 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
| Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
| Total Revenue: | $10,161,000 | $7,066 | $9,462,000 | $6,797 | $8,461,000 | $6,300 | |||
| Federal: | $839,000 | $583 | 8.3% | $721,000 | $518 | 7.6% | $714,000 | $532 | 8.4% |
| State: | $8,432,000 | $5,864 | 83.0% | $7,784,000 | $5,592 | 82.3% | $7,008,000 | $5,218 | 82.8% |
| Local: | $890,000 | $619 | 8.8% | $957,000 | $688 | 10.1% | $739,000 | $550 | 8.7% |
| Total Expenditures: | $9,667,000 | $6,723 | $8,999,000 | $6,465 | $8,487,000 | $6,319 | |||
| Total Current Expenditures: | $8,925,000 | $6,207 | $8,675,000 | $6,232 | $8,044,000 | $5,990 | |||
| Instructional Expenditures: | $5,724,000 | $3,981 | 64.1% | $5,618,000 | $4,036 | 64.8% | $5,195,000 | $3,868 | 64.6% |
| Student and Staff Support: | $401,000 | $279 | 4.5% | $395,000 | $284 | 4.6% | $369,000 | $275 | 4.6% |
| Administration: | $918,000 | $638 | 10.3% | $844,000 | $606 | 9.7% | $792,000 | $590 | 9.8% |
| Operations, Food, Other: | $1,882,000 | $1,309 | 21.1% | $1,818,000 | $1,306 | 21.0% | $1,688,000 | $1,257 | 21.0% |
| Total Capital Outlay: | $633,000 | $440 | $273,000 | $196 | $443,000 | $330 | |||
| Construction: | $584,000 | $406 | $220,000 | $158 | $353,000 | $263 | |||
| Total Other: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
| Interest on Debt: | $109,000 | $76 | $51,000 | $37 | $0 | $0 | |||
| Total Salary: | $5,507,000 | $3,830 | $5,174,000 | $3,717 | $5,018,000 | $3,736 | |||
| Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $4,013,000 | $2,791 | 72.9% | $3,721,000 | $2,673 | 71.9% | $3,632,000 | $2,704 | 72.4% |
| Other Salary: | $1,494,000 | $1,039 | 27.1% | $1,453,000 | $1,044 | 28.1% | $1,386,000 | $1,032 | 27.6% |
| Total Benefit: | $1,883,000 | $1,309 | $2,092,000 | $1,503 | $1,742,000 | $1,297 | |||
| Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $1,368,000 | $951 | 72.7% | $1,511,000 | $1,085 | 72.2% | $1,246,000 | $928 | 71.5% |
| Other Benefit: | $515,000 | $358 | 27.3% | $581,000 | $417 | 27.8% | $496,000 | $369 | 28.5% |
Teacher's Experience and Compensation
| 2007 | |
| Teachers with Bachelor Degree: | 84.6% |
| Teachers with Master or PhD Degree: | 15.4% |
| Mean Number of Years of Teaching: | 15.0 years |
| Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | 15.4% |
| Teachers with 6-10 Years of Experience: | 15.4% |
| Teachers with 11-20 Years of Experience: | 44.6% |
| Teachers with 21-30 Years of Experience: | 20.0% |
| Teachers with 31 Years of Experience or More: | 4.6% |
| Mean Base Salary: | $40,183.0 |
| Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | $30,094.0 |
| Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 6-10 Years of Experience: | $33,689.0 |
| Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 11-20 Years of Experience: | $43,736.0 |
| Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 21-30 Years of Experience: | $43,950.0 |
| Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 31 Years of Experience or More: | $44,780.0 |
* Sugar-Salem Joint School District 322 was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.
(52 out of 107, top 49%)
(15 out of 108, top 14%)*