Zanesville High School
1701 Blue Ave
Zanesville OH, 43701, Muskingum County
Phone: 740-453-0335
Ranking: (664 out of 821, bottom 19%)*
Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Zanesville City School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 45 | 44 | 43 | 43 | 42 | 41 | 45 | |||||||
Total Students: | 900 | 888 | 904 | 953 | 943 | 974 | 1,047 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 273 | 30.3% | 500 | 56.3% | 291 | 32.2% | 288 | 30.2% | 286 | 30.3% | 282 | 29.0% | 313 | 29.9% |
Grade 10: | 231 | 25.7% | 191 | 21.5% | 258 | 28.5% | 263 | 27.6% | 262 | 27.8% | 257 | 26.4% | 275 | 26.3% |
Grade 11: | 218 | 24.2% | 185 | 20.8% | 182 | 20.1% | 184 | 19.3% | 218 | 23.1% | 220 | 22.6% | 244 | 23.3% |
Grade 12: | 178 | 19.8% | 12 | 1.4% | 173 | 19.1% | 218 | 22.9% | 177 | 18.8% | 215 | 22.1% | 215 | 20.5% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 457 | 50.8% | 436 | 49.1% | 462 | 51.1% | 509 | 53.4% | 465 | 49.3% | 491 | 50.4% | 508 | 48.5% |
Female: | 443 | 49.2% | 452 | 50.9% | 442 | 48.9% | 444 | 46.6% | 418 | 44.3% | 430 | 44.1% | 486 | 46.4% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 7 | 0.8% | 5 | 0.6% | 5 | 0.6% | 8 | 0.8% | 14 | 1.5% | 15 | 1.5% | 4 | 0.4% |
Hispanic: | 9 | 1.0% | 16 | 1.8% | 13 | 1.4% | 13 | 1.4% | 8 | 0.8% | 7 | 0.7% | 6 | 0.6% |
Black: | 114 | 12.7% | 117 | 13.2% | 113 | 12.5% | 126 | 13.2% | 153 | 16.2% | 159 | 16.3% | 185 | 17.7% |
White: | 625 | 69.4% | 619 | 69.7% | 641 | 70.9% | 677 | 71.0% | 714 | 75.7% | 747 | 76.7% | 803 | 76.7% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 143 | 15.9% | 128 | 14.4% | 130 | 14.4% | 127 | 13.3% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 547 | 60.8% | 502 | 56.5% | 571 | 63.2% | 668 | 70.1% | 402 | 42.6% | 325 | 33.4% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 52 | 5.8% | 44 | 5.0% | 86 | 9.5% | 77 | 8.1% | 49 | 5.2% | 50 | 5.1% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 20.00 | 20.41 | 21.27 | 22.40 | 22.37 | 23.60 | 23.20 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 55.1% | 55.1% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.5% | 68.5% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 72.2% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.4% | 68.5% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 75.4% | 75.4% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.7% | 78.4% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.9% | 78.9% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.5% | 83.5% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.0% | 81.0% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 81.3% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.4% | 67.4% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 79.3% | 79.3% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 74% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.9% | 74.9% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.5% | 76.2% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.1% | 83.1% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 85.2% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.5% | 78.5% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.8% | 80.8% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 59.6% | 59.6% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 55.6% | 55.6% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 56.7% | 56.5% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.9% | 61.9% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.9% | 66.7% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.4% | 69.4% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.2% | 73.2% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 69.2% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.3% | 61.3% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.9% | 62.9% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 63.1% | 63.1% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 54.2% | 53.9% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 65.1% | 65.1% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 72.4% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 72.3% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 70.2% | 70.2% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.0% | 73.0% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.2% | 68.2% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 71.5% | 71.5% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.7% | 81.4% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.1% | 76.1% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 86.1% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.9% | 78.9% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 88.5% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.9% | 78.9% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 75.4% | 75.4% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 81.1% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 87.6% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 91.6% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 94.4% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 87.8% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 83.2% | 83.2% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.5% | 82.5% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 89.2% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 83.3% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 95.1% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.0% | 94.0% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 92.3% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 71.1% | 71.1% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 62.8% | 62.8% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 79.8% | 79.8% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 80.2% | 79.8% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.3% | 90.3% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.0% | 87.0% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 81.1% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 74.4% | 74.4% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 60.1% | 60.1% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 81.7% | 81.7% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 80.5% | 80.2% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 89.8% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.6% | 85.6% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 81.5% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 88.8% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 86.8% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.7% | 88.7% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.3% | 89.9% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 94.7% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 94.9% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 91.4% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Zanesville High School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.