Woodward High School
701 East Central Ave
Toledo OH, 43608, Lucas County
Phone: 419-671-6000
Ranking: (792 out of 821, bottom 4%)*
Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Toledo City School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 44 | 42 | 48 | 65 | 56 | 58 | 59 | |||||||
Total Students: | 604 | 641 | 731 | 776 | 780 | 770 | 879 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 230 | 38.1% | 256 | 39.9% | 286 | 39.1% | 329 | 42.4% | 335 | 42.9% | 310 | 40.3% | 358 | 40.7% |
Grade 10: | 135 | 22.4% | 142 | 22.2% | 180 | 24.6% | 174 | 22.4% | 181 | 23.2% | 193 | 25.1% | 189 | 21.5% |
Grade 11: | 128 | 21.2% | 115 | 17.9% | 119 | 16.3% | 157 | 20.2% | 128 | 16.4% | 106 | 13.8% | 175 | 19.9% |
Grade 12: | 111 | 18.4% | 124 | 19.3% | 144 | 19.7% | 116 | 14.9% | 136 | 17.4% | 161 | 20.9% | 157 | 17.9% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 338 | 56.0% | 344 | 53.7% | 408 | 55.8% | 384 | 49.5% | 385 | 49.4% | 379 | 49.2% | 440 | 50.1% |
Female: | 266 | 44.0% | 297 | 46.3% | 323 | 44.2% | 392 | 50.5% | 359 | 46.0% | 368 | 47.8% | 425 | 48.4% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% |
Asian: | 4 | 0.7% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.1% | 3 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.3% | 4 | 0.5% |
Hispanic: | 66 | 10.9% | 69 | 10.8% | 66 | 9.0% | 58 | 7.5% | 50 | 6.4% | 60 | 7.8% | 57 | 6.5% |
Black: | 362 | 59.9% | 386 | 60.2% | 468 | 64.0% | 517 | 66.6% | 521 | 66.8% | 516 | 67.0% | 611 | 69.5% |
White: | 140 | 23.2% | 151 | 23.6% | 164 | 22.4% | 167 | 21.5% | 180 | 23.1% | 177 | 23.0% | 196 | 22.3% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 32 | 5.3% | 34 | 5.3% | 32 | 4.4% | 31 | 4.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 529 | 87.6% | 561 | 87.5% | 580 | 79.3% | 695 | 89.6% | 549 | 70.4% | 465 | 60.4% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 12 | 2.0% | 21 | 3.3% | 14 | 1.9% | 7 | 0.9% | 13 | 1.7% | 20 | 2.6% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 13.73 | 15.26 | 15.23 | 11.94 | 13.93 | 13.30 | 14.90 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 32.6% | 48.3% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 58.8% | 70.3% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 51.6% | 63.4% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 52% | 64.9% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 46.9% | 64% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 50% | 69.7% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 53.8% | 70.8% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 48.9% | 69.9% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 52.0% | 69.6% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 56.9% | 69.7% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 49% | 63.2% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 90.6% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 80.4% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 64% | 78.6% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.2% | 76.7% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 57.9% | 77.9% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 50.4% | 72.2% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.6% | 78.7% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 52.0% | 73.7% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.4% | 79.0% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 39.1% | 52.9% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 37.2% | 50.3% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 41.4% | 54.2% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 34.1% | 55.6% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 35.9% | 60.6% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 36.6% | 59.7% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 40.4% | 63.2% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 46.7% | 60.8% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 44.3% | 61.0% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 52.6% | 67.9% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 56.3% | 64.6% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 46.9% | 63.7% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 46.8% | 66.9% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 50.7% | 72.3% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 52.7% | 71.4% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 46.4% | 67.3% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 48.3% | 66.1% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 52.0% | 64.7% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.4% | 82.7% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.5% | 79.1% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 85.2% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.9% | 81.7% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 75.2% | 88.7% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 60.2% | 79.2% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 84.7% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 63.8% | 81.6% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.2% | 76.9% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 68.5% | 80.8% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 67.9% | 79.5% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 67.6% | 81.3% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 67% | 83.5% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 67.9% | 82.3% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 80.1% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 68.6% | 82.2% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 81.6% | 88.3% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 79.1% | 88.7% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 87.5% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 70.1% | 88.3% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 76.1% | 87.6% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 74.3% | 85.1% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 77.1% | 89.6% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 54.2% | 70.9% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 50.9% | 69.8% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 47.2% | 71.5% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 50.9% | 76.2% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 54.5% | 75.5% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 60.0% | 73.9% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 64.8% | 76.4% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 69.7% | 80.5% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 58.9% | 79.1% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 68.9% | 81.5% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 58.9% | 84% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 62.7% | 82.4% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 63.8% | 77.3% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 68.6% | 83.0% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 89.2% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 90.5% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 80% | 88.6% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 75.2% | 90.5% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 90.5% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 84.8% | 88.1% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 90.1% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Woodward High School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.