2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 9 | 11 | 9 | 10 | 8 | NA | NA | NA | NA | |||||
Total Students: | 163 | 165 | 153 | 144 | 133 | 133 | 142 | |||||||
Grade 4: | 77 | 47.2% | 87 | 52.7% | 78 | 51.0% | 82 | 56.9% | 66 | 49.6% | 64 | 48.1% | 64 | 45.1% |
Grade 5: | 86 | 52.8% | 78 | 47.3% | 75 | 49.0% | 62 | 43.1% | 67 | 50.4% | 69 | 51.9% | 78 | 54.9% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 81 | 49.7% | 90 | 54.5% | 79 | 51.6% | 74 | 51.4% | 64 | 48.1% | 59 | 44.4% | 70 | 49.3% |
Female: | 82 | 50.3% | 75 | 45.5% | 74 | 48.4% | 70 | 48.6% | 61 | 45.9% | 66 | 49.6% | 68 | 47.9% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.8% | 2 | 1.4% |
Asian: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.8% | 1 | 0.7% |
Hispanic: | 33 | 20.2% | 27 | 16.4% | 29 | 19.0% | 33 | 22.9% | 33 | 24.8% | 31 | 23.3% | 23 | 16.2% |
Black: | 32 | 19.6% | 34 | 20.6% | 33 | 21.6% | 23 | 16.0% | 26 | 19.5% | 25 | 18.8% | 29 | 20.4% |
White: | 95 | 58.3% | 101 | 61.2% | 89 | 58.2% | 84 | 58.3% | 74 | 55.6% | 75 | 56.4% | 87 | 61.3% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.7% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 3 | 1.8% | 3 | 1.8% | 2 | 1.3% | 3 | 2.1% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 86 | 52.8% | 99 | 60.0% | 75 | 49.0% | 77 | 53.5% | 79 | 59.4% | 65 | 48.9% | 61 | 43.0% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 17 | 10.4% | 18 | 10.9% | 26 | 17.0% | 18 | 12.5% | 22 | 16.5% | 22 | 16.5% | 9 | 6.3% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 17.95 | 14.45 | 16.38 | 14.40 | 15.97 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
STAAR | ||||||
2012 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 53% | 53% | N/A |
2013 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 52% | 52% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | N/A |
2012 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 55% | 55% | N/A |
2013 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 63% | 63% | N/A |
2012 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 66% | 66% | N/A |
2013 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 61% | 61% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 67% | 67% | N/A |
TAKS | ||||||
2009 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 58% | 58% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 94% | 94% | N/A |
2009 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | N/A |
2010 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | N/A |
2011 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 90% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 97% | 97% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 94% | 94% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 69% | 69% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 94% | 94% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Winona Intermediate Middle School was rated 1.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.