Whitehall Yearling High School
4738 Kae Ave
Columbus OH, 43213, Franklin County
Phone: 614-417-5100
Ranking: (671 out of 821, bottom 18%)*
Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Whitehall City School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 44 | 54 | 52 | 56 | 57 | 59 | 57 | |||||||
Total Students: | 757 | 740 | 722 | 772 | 727 | 815 | 896 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 284 | 37.5% | 276 | 37.3% | 247 | 34.2% | 281 | 36.4% | 218 | 30.0% | 194 | 23.8% | 286 | 31.9% |
Grade 10: | 206 | 27.2% | 172 | 23.2% | 199 | 27.6% | 169 | 21.9% | 176 | 24.2% | 248 | 30.4% | 217 | 24.2% |
Grade 11: | 128 | 16.9% | 158 | 21.4% | 146 | 20.2% | 134 | 17.4% | 197 | 27.1% | 185 | 22.7% | 213 | 23.8% |
Grade 12: | 139 | 18.4% | 134 | 18.1% | 129 | 17.9% | 188 | 24.4% | 136 | 18.7% | 188 | 23.1% | 180 | 20.1% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 386 | 51.0% | 378 | 51.1% | 379 | 52.5% | 409 | 53.0% | 361 | 49.7% | 402 | 49.3% | 461 | 51.5% |
Female: | 371 | 49.0% | 362 | 48.9% | 343 | 47.5% | 363 | 47.0% | 310 | 42.6% | 363 | 44.5% | 383 | 42.7% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 2 | 0.3% | 4 | 0.5% | 2 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.3% | 5 | 0.6% | 5 | 0.6% |
Asian: | 10 | 1.3% | 11 | 1.5% | 11 | 1.5% | 9 | 1.2% | 8 | 1.1% | 10 | 1.2% | 10 | 1.1% |
Hispanic: | 109 | 14.4% | 103 | 13.9% | 96 | 13.3% | 93 | 12.0% | 76 | 10.5% | 76 | 9.3% | 69 | 7.7% |
Black: | 289 | 38.2% | 275 | 37.2% | 246 | 34.1% | 251 | 32.5% | 236 | 32.5% | 261 | 32.0% | 294 | 32.8% |
White: | 297 | 39.2% | 297 | 40.1% | 322 | 44.6% | 374 | 48.4% | 357 | 49.1% | 421 | 51.7% | 470 | 52.5% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 50 | 6.6% | 50 | 6.8% | 45 | 6.2% | 45 | 5.8% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 406 | 53.6% | 437 | 59.1% | 467 | 64.7% | 443 | 57.4% | 403 | 55.4% | 471 | 57.8% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 64 | 8.5% | 71 | 9.6% | 71 | 9.8% | 69 | 8.9% | 85 | 11.7% | 97 | 11.9% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 17.05 | 13.60 | 13.78 | 13.69 | 12.67 | 13.70 | 15.70 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 40.9% | 40.9% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.8% | 66.8% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.6% | 76.6% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 68.8% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 68.8% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 71.5% | 71.5% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.1% | 67.1% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 80.6% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 72.2% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.5% | 66.5% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 88.3% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 86.1% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.7% | 80.7% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 72.2% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 77.3% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.3% | 73.3% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 88.6% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.7% | 80.7% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 82.8% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 54.4% | 54.4% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 52.2% | 52.2% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 54.8% | 54.8% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 56.1% | 56.1% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 52.2% | 52.2% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 52.8% | 52.8% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 59.5% | 59.5% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 65.6% | 65.6% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.0% | 63.6% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 63.9% | 63.9% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 65.2% | 65.2% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 64.7% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 63.8% | 63.8% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.5% | 64.5% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.6% | 69.6% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 82.9% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.8% | 76.8% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 76.8% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 71.4% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.8% | 84.8% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.7% | 67.7% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.5% | 85.5% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 92.4% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 81.1% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 85.4% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 84.5% | 84.5% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 84.1% | 84.1% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 93% | 93% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 86.1% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.0% | 87.0% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 84.7% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.9% | 89.9% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 90.2% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 88.2% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.2% | 92.2% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 87.6% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 69.6% | 69.6% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 75.5% | 75.5% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 73.3% | 73.3% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 76.6% | 76.6% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 74.3% | 74.3% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 80.5% | 80.5% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 75.1% | 75.3% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 81.2% | 81.2% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.5% | 82.5% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 83.6% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 81.9% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.0% | 87.0% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 82.9% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 93.3% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 88.5% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 95.3% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 88.2% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.2% | 92.2% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.9% | 90.0% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Whitehall Yearling High School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.