Trinity High School
500 North Industrial Blvd
Euless TX, 76039, Tarrant County
Phone: 817-571-0271
Ranking:
(290 out of 1,337, top 22%)*

Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 10 to Grade 12
School District: Hurst-Euless-Bedford Independent School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 139 | 137 | 134 | 139 | 132 | 132 | 132 | |||||||
Total Students: | 2,416 | 2,404 | 2,360 | 2,312 | 2,181 | 2,183 | 2,165 | |||||||
Grade 10: | 829 | 34.3% | 814 | 33.9% | 819 | 34.7% | 823 | 35.6% | 744 | 34.1% | 714 | 32.7% | 719 | 33.2% |
Grade 11: | 803 | 33.2% | 813 | 33.8% | 821 | 34.8% | 770 | 33.3% | 756 | 34.7% | 732 | 33.5% | 718 | 33.2% |
Grade 12: | 784 | 32.5% | 777 | 32.3% | 720 | 30.5% | 719 | 31.1% | 681 | 31.2% | 737 | 33.8% | 728 | 33.6% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 1,267 | 52.4% | 1,245 | 51.8% | 1,217 | 51.6% | 1,190 | 51.5% | 1,112 | 51.0% | 1,090 | 49.9% | 1,088 | 50.3% |
Female: | 1,149 | 47.6% | 1,159 | 48.2% | 1,143 | 48.4% | 1,122 | 48.5% | 1,061 | 48.6% | 1,085 | 49.7% | 1,073 | 49.6% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 13 | 0.5% | 12 | 0.5% | 16 | 0.7% | 19 | 0.8% | 18 | 0.8% | 21 | 1.0% | 23 | 1.1% |
Asian: | 247 | 10.2% | 245 | 10.2% | 255 | 10.8% | 222 | 9.6% | 292 | 13.4% | 277 | 12.7% | 286 | 13.2% |
Hispanic: | 599 | 24.8% | 602 | 25.0% | 547 | 23.2% | 514 | 22.2% | 446 | 20.4% | 423 | 19.4% | 421 | 19.4% |
Black: | 480 | 19.9% | 430 | 17.9% | 403 | 17.1% | 434 | 18.8% | 407 | 18.7% | 378 | 17.3% | 332 | 15.3% |
White: | 909 | 37.6% | 935 | 38.9% | 969 | 41.1% | 959 | 41.5% | 1,018 | 46.7% | 1,084 | 49.7% | 1,103 | 50.9% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 102 | 4.2% | 112 | 4.7% | 97 | 4.1% | 94 | 4.1% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 66 | 2.7% | 68 | 2.8% | 73 | 3.1% | 70 | 3.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 909 | 37.6% | 866 | 36.0% | 836 | 35.4% | 792 | 34.3% | 677 | 31.0% | 625 | 28.6% | 485 | 22.4% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 262 | 10.8% | 239 | 9.9% | 195 | 8.3% | 199 | 8.6% | 190 | 8.7% | 164 | 7.5% | 160 | 7.4% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 17.40 | 17.48 | 17.56 | 16.61 | 16.49 | 16.50 | 16.40 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
STAAR EOC | ||||||
2013 | Algebra I | End of course | % met std | 19% | 93% | 78% |
2013 | Algebra II | End of course | % met std | 99% | 100% | 97% |
2013 | Biology | End of course | % met std | 56% | 97% | 85% |
2013 | Chemistry | End of course | % met std | 93% | 94% | 84% |
2013 | English I Reading | End of course | % met std | 36% | 82% | 65% |
2013 | English I Writing | End of course | % met std | 20% | 67% | 48% |
2013 | English II Reading | End of course | % met std | 86% | 88% | 78% |
2013 | English II Writing | End of course | % met std | 59% | 64% | 52% |
2013 | English III Writing | End of course | % met std | 68% | 68% | 42% |
2013 | Geometry | End of course | % met std | 90% | 94% | 86% |
2012 | Physics | End of course | % met std | 57% | 57% | 61% |
2013 | World Geography | End of course | % met std | 35% | 91% | 75% |
2013 | World History | End of course | % met std | 88% | 88% | 70% |
TAKS | ||||||
2004 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 74% | N/A |
2005 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 68% | 70% | N/A |
2006 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 71% | 71% | N/A |
2007 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 83% | 79% | N/A |
2008 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 76% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 82% | 81% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 83% | 84% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 76% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92% | 93% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90% | 91% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 95% | 93% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 94% | 94% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 95% | 95% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 95% | 95% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 66% | 65% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 69% | 71% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 71% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 80% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 73% | 79% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 83% | 85% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 84% | 85% | N/A |
2004 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 94% | 93% | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 89% | 90% | N/A |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 94% | 93% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 96% | 96% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 97% | 97% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 97% | 97% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 97% | 97% | N/A |
2004 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 94% | 92% | N/A |
2005 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | N/A |
2006 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 87% | 86% | N/A |
2007 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 90% | 87% | N/A |
2008 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 92% | 91% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 88% | 90% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 95% | 94% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 94% | 93% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93% | 91% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 91% | 92% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92% | 93% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 97% | 97% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 97% | 97% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 97% | 97% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 96% | 97% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 91% | 92% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 85% | 86% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 85% | 84% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 90% | 89% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 91% | 92% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 96% | 96% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 95% | 95% | N/A |
2004 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 99% | 99% | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 95% | 97% | N/A |
2006 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98% | 97% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 96% | 96% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 99% | 98% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 99% | 99% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 99% | 99% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 99% | 99% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
Teacher's Experience and Compensation
2007 | |
Teachers with Bachelor Degree: | 58.6% |
Teachers with Master or PhD Degree: | 41.4% |
Mean Number of Years of Teaching: | 17.0 years |
Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | 10.3% |
Teachers with 6 Years of Experience or More: | 89.7% |
Mean Base Salary: | $54,021.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | $44,893.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 6 Years of Experience or More: | $55,075.0 |
* Trinity High School was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.