2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 9 | 13 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |||||||
Total Students: | 131 | 126 | 107 | 129 | 137 | 136 | 144 | |||||||
Grade 6: | 51 | 38.9% | 49 | 38.9% | 28 | 26.2% | 44 | 34.1% | 37 | 27.0% | 48 | 35.3% | 52 | 36.1% |
Grade 7: | 51 | 38.9% | 28 | 22.2% | 45 | 42.1% | 37 | 28.7% | 51 | 37.2% | 48 | 35.3% | 44 | 30.6% |
Grade 8: | 29 | 22.1% | 49 | 38.9% | 34 | 31.8% | 48 | 37.2% | 49 | 35.8% | 40 | 29.4% | 48 | 33.3% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 67 | 51.1% | 60 | 47.6% | 55 | 51.4% | 67 | 51.9% | 65 | 47.4% | 61 | 44.9% | 74 | 51.4% |
Female: | 64 | 48.9% | 66 | 52.4% | 52 | 48.6% | 62 | 48.1% | 63 | 46.0% | 63 | 46.3% | 66 | 45.8% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 2 | 1.5% | 1 | 0.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Hispanic: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.8% | 1 | 0.7% | 2 | 1.5% | 1 | 0.7% |
Black: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 4.2% |
White: | 129 | 98.5% | 124 | 98.4% | 106 | 99.1% | 127 | 98.4% | 135 | 98.5% | 130 | 95.6% | 137 | 95.1% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.8% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 53 | 40.5% | 30 | 23.8% | 14 | 13.1% | 40 | 31.0% | 34 | 24.8% | 33 | 24.3% | 26 | 18.1% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 5 | 3.8% | 11 | 8.7% | 24 | 22.4% | 10 | 7.8% | 13 | 9.5% | 5 | 3.7% | 4 | 2.8% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 14.56 | 9.78 | 16.07 | 43.00 | 45.67 | 45.30 | 48.00 |
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
ISAT | ||||||
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.7% | 81.7% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 88.6% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 83.4% | 83.4% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.6% | 93.6% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 82.8% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 84.4% | 84.4% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 93.1% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 61.7% | 61.7% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 75.5% | 75.5% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 75.0% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 83.4% | 83.4% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 83.0% | 83.0% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 65.8% | 65.8% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 66.6% | 66.6% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 75.9% | 75.9% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 57.5% | 57.5% | N/A |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.0% | 73.0% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.6% | 81.6% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.1% | 84.1% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.2% | 81.2% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 95.7% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 91.4% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 86.4% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 71.4% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 63.5% | 63.5% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 79.6% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 72.8% | 72.8% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 85.4% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 87.2% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 71.4% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 75.0% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 60.7% | 60.7% | N/A |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 75.7% | 75.7% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 80.9% | 80.9% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 87.1% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.4% | 79.4% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.9% | 93.9% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.7% | 88.7% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 87.6% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.6% | 93.6% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.1% | 77.1% | N/A |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 72.7% | N/A |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 85.7% | N/A |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 56.4% | 56.4% | N/A |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.8% | 73.8% | N/A |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 57.5% | 57.5% | N/A |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 79.6% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 79.6% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 87.5% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 87.8% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 83.7% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 95.7% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 46.9% | 46.9% | N/A |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 80.0% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.1% | 69.1% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 70% | 70% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.1% | 83.1% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.1% | 83.1% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 87.5% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 92.7% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 89.8% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 97.9% | 97.9% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 80.0% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 48.9% | 48.9% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Tri-City Jr High School was rated 3 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.