Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
CRT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 58.8% | 58.8% | N/A |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 66.7% | N/A |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 53.8% | 53.8% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 37.1% | 37.1% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 39% | 39% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 47% | 47% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 58.8% | 58.8% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 59.3% | 59.3% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 73.1% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 60% | 60% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 33% | 33% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 31% | 31% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Superior High School, Test Performance was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.