2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 73 | 74 | 74 | 73 | 74 | 80 | 81 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,069 | 1,056 | 1,065 | 1,071 | 1,070 | 1,087 | 1,133 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 289 | 27.0% | 264 | 25.0% | 264 | 24.8% | 260 | 24.3% | 284 | 26.5% | 256 | 23.6% | 267 | 23.6% |
Grade 10: | 263 | 24.6% | 255 | 24.1% | 260 | 24.4% | 285 | 26.6% | 248 | 23.2% | 262 | 24.1% | 277 | 24.4% |
Grade 11: | 252 | 23.6% | 254 | 24.1% | 270 | 25.4% | 259 | 24.2% | 257 | 24.0% | 273 | 25.1% | 269 | 23.7% |
Grade 12: | 265 | 24.8% | 283 | 26.8% | 271 | 25.4% | 267 | 24.9% | 281 | 26.3% | 296 | 27.2% | 320 | 28.2% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 528 | 49.4% | 537 | 50.9% | 524 | 49.2% | 526 | 49.1% | 516 | 48.2% | 528 | 48.6% | 551 | 48.6% |
Female: | 541 | 50.6% | 519 | 49.1% | 541 | 50.8% | 545 | 50.9% | 546 | 51.0% | 551 | 50.7% | 578 | 51.0% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 3 | 0.3% | 5 | 0.5% | 6 | 0.6% | 7 | 0.7% | 6 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.2% | 4 | 0.4% |
Asian: | 13 | 1.2% | 10 | 0.9% | 11 | 1.0% | 14 | 1.3% | 15 | 1.4% | 17 | 1.6% | 18 | 1.6% |
Hispanic: | 22 | 2.1% | 20 | 1.9% | 24 | 2.3% | 21 | 2.0% | 15 | 1.4% | 15 | 1.4% | 14 | 1.2% |
Black: | 32 | 3.0% | 38 | 3.6% | 38 | 3.6% | 40 | 3.7% | 38 | 3.6% | 32 | 2.9% | 25 | 2.2% |
White: | 977 | 91.4% | 964 | 91.3% | 972 | 91.3% | 980 | 91.5% | 996 | 93.1% | 1,021 | 93.9% | 1,072 | 94.6% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 22 | 2.1% | 19 | 1.8% | 14 | 1.3% | 9 | 0.8% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 186 | 17.4% | 188 | 17.8% | 158 | 14.8% | 137 | 12.8% | 129 | 12.1% | 106 | 9.8% | 92 | 8.1% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 37 | 3.5% | 21 | 2.0% | 15 | 1.4% | 17 | 1.6% | 21 | 2.0% | 20 | 1.8% | 40 | 3.5% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 14.65 | 14.29 | 14.39 | 14.61 | 14.42 | 13.50 | 14.00 |
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
WKCE | ||||||
2004 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 68% | 68% | N/A |
2005 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2006 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2007 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2008 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2009 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | N/A |
2010 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | N/A |
2011 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2012 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2013 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | N/A |
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 55% | 55% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 46% | 46% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | N/A |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | N/A |
2004 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 70% | 70% | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | N/A |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Stoughton High High School was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.