USA.com / Alabama / Lee County / Auburn, AL / 36832 / Public Schools / Smiths Station High School / Test Performance
Smiths Station High School, Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
ADAW | ||||||
2004 | Grammar and Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 49.3% | 45.2% | 46.9% |
2005 | Grammar and Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 49% | 45.6% | 44.8% |
2006 | Grammar and Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 54% | 46.9% | 49% |
2008 | Grammar and Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 33.92% | 40.35% | 46.76% |
2009 | Grammar and Usage | 10th Grade | % met std | 36.01% | 39.58% | 42.56% |
2004 | Holistic Composition | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 62.8% | 65% |
2005 | Holistic Composition | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.8% | 60.7% | 64.3% |
2006 | Holistic Composition | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.5% | 66.2% | 69% |
2008 | Holistic Composition | 10th Grade | % met std | 57.14% | 62.5% | 64.91% |
2009 | Holistic Composition | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.37% | 72.15% | 76.43% |
2004 | Sentence Formation | 10th Grade | % met std | 63% | 58.6% | 60.3% |
2005 | Sentence Formation | 10th Grade | % met std | 58.3% | 56.4% | 56.8% |
2006 | Sentence Formation | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.8% | 62.1% | 63.6% |
2008 | Sentence Formation | 10th Grade | % met std | 57.02% | 59.49% | 61.3% |
2009 | Sentence Formation | 10th Grade | % met std | 63.53% | 59.58% | 61.43% |
2004 | Writing Mechanics | 10th Grade | % met std | 55.5% | 51.7% | 56.7% |
2005 | Writing Mechanics | 10th Grade | % met std | 55.9% | 55.5% | 54.6% |
2006 | Writing Mechanics | 10th Grade | % met std | 59.2% | 53.5% | 59.2% |
2008 | Writing Mechanics | 10th Grade | % met std | 51.46% | 54.83% | 59.53% |
2009 | Writing Mechanics | 10th Grade | % met std | 59.17% | 58.6% | 57.81% |
AHSGE | ||||||
2008 | Biology | 11th Grade | % met std | 71.99% | 68.79% | 72.59% |
2009 | Biology | 11th Grade | % met std | 86.74% | 89.65% | 87.59% |
2010 | Biology | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.14% | 94.48% | 93.34% |
2011 | Biology | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.83% | 95.8% | 94.47% |
2012 | Biology | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.52% | 95.73% | 95.24% |
2004 | Language | 11th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 77.1% | 81% |
2005 | Language | 11th Grade | % met std | 79.7% | 76.5% | 80.4% |
2006 | Language | 11th Grade | % met std | 79.7% | 78.6% | 82.2% |
2007 | Language | 11th Grade | % met std | 81.64% | 79.25% | 80.01% |
2008 | Language | 11th Grade | % met std | 71.47% | 72.78% | 76.95% |
2009 | Language | 11th Grade | % met std | 77.75% | 81.72% | 81.82% |
2010 | Language | 11th Grade | % met std | 75.28% | 77.52% | 78.46% |
2011 | Language | 11th Grade | % met std | 74.32% | 75.61% | 77.64% |
2012 | Language | 11th Grade | % met std | 76.92% | 74.75% | 75.1% |
2004 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 68.2% | 78% |
2005 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 73.2% | 68.9% | 78.3% |
2006 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 78.4% | 76.2% | 83.6% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 83.87% | 82.85% | 83.74% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 76.48% | 78.88% | 84.02% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 77.33% | 79.48% | 85.56% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 78.02% | 78.27% | 84.32% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.32% | 87.4% | 85.39% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.34% | 91.04% | 85.03% |
2004 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 83.7% | 86.9% |
2005 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 84.6% | 85.7% |
2006 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 81.8% | 85.6% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 83.87% | 82.16% | 82.19% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 74.93% | 77.19% | 81.17% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 79.24% | 80.06% | 81.63% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 80.18% | 80.58% | 81.82% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.23% | 85.5% | 83.29% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 83.53% | 81.79% | 82.92% |
2004 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 88% | 81% | 82.1% |
2005 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.4% | 81% | 80.9% |
2006 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 80.8% | 84.8% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 81.74% | 82.09% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.05% | 79.43% | 81.22% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 69.81% | 70.12% | 75.76% |
2004 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 74.6% | 70.5% | 74.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 75.7% | 68.2% | 76% |
2006 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 71% | 67.3% | 77.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 68.24% | 67.77% | 73.9% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 61.79% | 64.11% | 72.58% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 79.84% | 77.06% | 78.86% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 76.82% | 73.66% | 73.05% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 72.67% | 72.46% | 71.38% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 77.96% | 71.98% | 71.26% |
2010 | Biology | 12th Grade | % met std | 95.26% | 96.29% | 94.02% |
2011 | Biology | 12th Grade | % met std | 99.78% | 99.13% | 98.1% |
2012 | Biology | 12th Grade | % met std | 100% | 100% | 98.49% |
2004 | Language | 12th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 91.8% | 95.4% |
2005 | Language | 12th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 93.9% | 94.5% |
2006 | Language | 12th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 93.4% | 94.7% |
2007 | Language | 12th Grade | % met std | 92.04% | 90.82% | 89.7% |
2008 | Language | 12th Grade | % met std | 93.09% | 92.98% | 94.49% |
2009 | Language | 12th Grade | % met std | 95.51% | 94.95% | 92.8% |
2010 | Language | 12th Grade | % met std | 92.27% | 94.07% | 91.1% |
2011 | Language | 12th Grade | % met std | 95.9% | 95.04% | 91.4% |
2012 | Language | 12th Grade | % met std | 94.48% | 94.53% | 90.39% |
2004 | Math | 12th Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 93.2% | 95.7% |
2005 | Math | 12th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 92% | 94.7% |
2006 | Math | 12th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 93% | 95.6% |
2007 | Math | 12th Grade | % met std | 92.03% | 91.59% | 90.48% |
2008 | Math | 12th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 95.65% | 95.45% |
2009 | Math | 12th Grade | % met std | 98.04% | 96.46% | 95.36% |
2010 | Math | 12th Grade | % met std | 97.23% | 97.12% | 94.73% |
2011 | Math | 12th Grade | % met std | 97.04% | 96.35% | 94.82% |
2012 | Math | 12th Grade | % met std | 98.33% | 97.84% | 94.83% |
2004 | Reading | 12th Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 95.1% | 96.5% |
2005 | Reading | 12th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 94.6% | 95.4% |
2006 | Reading | 12th Grade | % met std | 96.3% | 93.9% | 95.2% |
2007 | Reading | 12th Grade | % met std | 92.03% | 91.02% | 90.19% |
2008 | Reading | 12th Grade | % met std | 94% | 94.15% | 95.01% |
2009 | Reading | 12th Grade | % met std | 94.38% | 94.45% | 94.2% |
2010 | Reading | 12th Grade | % met std | 95.58% | 95.83% | 93.57% |
2011 | Reading | 12th Grade | % met std | 96.59% | 96.36% | 93.78% |
2012 | Reading | 12th Grade | % met std | 98.56% | 97.12% | 93.62% |
2004 | Science | 12th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 92.5% | 95.9% |
2005 | Science | 12th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 95.2% | 95.3% |
2006 | Science | 12th Grade | % met std | 98.7% | 96% | 95.9% |
2007 | Science | 12th Grade | % met std | 93.51% | 92.16% | 90.62% |
2008 | Science | 12th Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 94.98% | 95.24% |
2009 | Science | 12th Grade | % met std | 97.19% | 95.12% | 93.62% |
2004 | Social Studies | 12th Grade | % met std | 90% | 89.8% | 92.7% |
2005 | Social Studies | 12th Grade | % met std | 93.2% | 92.2% | 93.4% |
2006 | Social Studies | 12th Grade | % met std | 93.9% | 91.3% | 93.7% |
2007 | Social Studies | 12th Grade | % met std | 86.73% | 86.42% | 88.74% |
2008 | Social Studies | 12th Grade | % met std | 91.89% | 92.31% | 92.95% |
2009 | Social Studies | 12th Grade | % met std | 95.22% | 93.94% | 91.58% |
2010 | Social Studies | 12th Grade | % met std | 96.96% | 94.23% | 90.45% |
2011 | Social Studies | 12th Grade | % met std | 96.36% | 94.46% | 87.99% |
2012 | Social Studies | 12th Grade | % met std | 96.16% | 95.97% | 89.74% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Smiths Station High School, Test Performance was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.