USA.com / Maryland / Harford County / Abingdon, MD / Public Schools / Ring Factory Elementary Primary School
Ring Factory Elementary Primary School
1400 Emmorton Rd Bel Air MD, 21014, Harford County Phone: 410-638-4186 Ranking:  (121 out of 1,074, top 11%)*Type: Regular Primary School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Kindergarten to Grade 5 School District: Harford County Public Schools Title I Eligible School: No Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
| 2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
| Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
| Total Teachers: | 38 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 33 | 33 | 34 | |||||||
| Total Students: | 557 | 549 | 542 | 511 | 513 | 500 | 527 | |||||||
| Kindergarten: | 87 | 15.6% | 85 | 15.5% | 87 | 16.1% | 84 | 16.4% | 92 | 17.9% | 75 | 15.0% | 78 | 14.8% |
| Grade 1: | 86 | 15.4% | 82 | 14.9% | 93 | 17.2% | 93 | 18.2% | 78 | 15.2% | 68 | 13.6% | 61 | 11.6% |
| Grade 2: | 83 | 14.9% | 91 | 16.6% | 102 | 18.8% | 78 | 15.3% | 72 | 14.0% | 68 | 13.6% | 98 | 18.6% |
| Grade 3: | 103 | 18.5% | 111 | 20.2% | 92 | 17.0% | 79 | 15.5% | 77 | 15.0% | 96 | 19.2% | 99 | 18.8% |
| Grade 4: | 109 | 19.6% | 91 | 16.6% | 85 | 15.7% | 78 | 15.3% | 98 | 19.1% | 98 | 19.6% | 93 | 17.6% |
| Grade 5: | 89 | 16.0% | 89 | 16.2% | 83 | 15.3% | 99 | 19.4% | 96 | 18.7% | 95 | 19.0% | 98 | 18.6% |
| Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
| Male: | 278 | 49.9% | 281 | 51.2% | 275 | 50.7% | 259 | 50.7% | 251 | 48.9% | 258 | 51.6% | 290 | 55.0% |
| Female: | 279 | 50.1% | 268 | 48.8% | 267 | 49.3% | 252 | 49.3% | 254 | 49.5% | 234 | 46.8% | 233 | 44.2% |
| Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
| American Indian/Alaska Native: | 5 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.6% | 1 | 0.2% |
| Asian: | 25 | 4.5% | 26 | 4.7% | 27 | 5.0% | 35 | 6.8% | 35 | 6.8% | 38 | 7.6% | 30 | 5.7% |
| Hispanic: | 23 | 4.1% | 20 | 3.6% | 25 | 4.6% | 19 | 3.7% | 15 | 2.9% | 10 | 2.0% | 7 | 1.3% |
| Black: | 37 | 6.6% | 32 | 5.8% | 34 | 6.3% | 27 | 5.3% | 31 | 6.0% | 29 | 5.8% | 34 | 6.5% |
| White: | 446 | 80.1% | 450 | 82.0% | 440 | 81.2% | 415 | 81.2% | 429 | 83.6% | 420 | 84.0% | 455 | 86.3% |
| Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 2 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Two or More Races: | 19 | 3.4% | 19 | 3.5% | 14 | 2.6% | 13 | 2.5% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
| Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 60 | 10.8% | 54 | 9.8% | 58 | 10.7% | 38 | 7.4% | 33 | 6.4% | 32 | 6.4% | 25 | 4.7% |
| Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 11 | 2.0% | 12 | 2.2% | 19 | 3.5% | 17 | 3.3% | 20 | 3.9% | 7 | 1.4% | 17 | 3.2% |
| Student-Teacher Ratio: | 14.62 | 16.21 | 15.80 | 14.99 | 15.59 | 15.20 | 15.50 | |||||||
Test Performance
| Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
| MSA | ||||||
| 2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.6% | 81.1% | 72.2% |
| 2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 83.8% | 76.8% |
| 2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 85.3% | 79.1% |
| 2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 82.3% | 78.6% |
| 2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 97.9% | 88.5% | 82.6% |
| 2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 87.2% | 84.3% |
| 2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 86.4% | 86.0% |
| 2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 98.7% | 88.1% | 86.3% |
| 2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 89.9% | 87.7% |
| 2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.7% | 87.0% | 82.2% |
| 2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.0% | 79.6% | 71.0% |
| 2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94% | 82.0% | 75.8% |
| 2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 81.3% | 78.3% |
| 2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 83.5% | 80.5% |
| 2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.0% | 87.4% | 83.0% |
| 2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 87.4% | 84.9% |
| 2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 86.5% | 84.0% |
| 2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 98.7% | 87.3% | 85.1% |
| 2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 88.6% | 85.0% |
| 2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.7% | 88.7% | 82.6% |
| 2004 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 79.1% | 69.6% |
| 2005 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 83.4% | 76.5% |
| 2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 86.8% | 82.1% |
| 2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.9% | 88.9% | 86% |
| 2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.9% | 91.4% | 88.6% |
| 2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 92.4% | 89.2% |
| 2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 96.0% | 92.0% | 90.2% |
| 2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 98.7% | 92.5% | 90.3% |
| 2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.7% | 92.7% | 89.8% |
| 2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 91.5% | 88.8% |
| 2004 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 82.1% | 75.1% |
| 2005 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 88.6% | 81.0% |
| 2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 96.6% | 89.6% | 81.8% |
| 2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.9% | 90.6% | 86.0% |
| 2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.9% | 90.2% | 88.4% |
| 2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.9% | 89.2% | 86.7% |
| 2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 89.4% | 87.4% |
| 2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 91.9% | 88.7% |
| 2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 98.8% | 93.9% | 89.8% |
| 2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 98.8% | 91.8% | 88.2% |
| 2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.9% | 74.5% | 63.1% |
| 2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 75.6% | 69.2% |
| 2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.9% | 77.8% | 73.4% |
| 2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 83.9% | 78.3% |
| 2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.9% | 85.8% | 80.5% |
| 2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 86.4% | 81.2% |
| 2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 88.7% | 83.2% |
| 2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 98.0% | 86.4% | 82.2% |
| 2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 89.5% | 85.3% |
| 2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 97.7% | 88.1% | 80.8% |
| 2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 78.6% | 68.4% |
| 2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.6% | 82.0% | 74.3% |
| 2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.9% | 83.8% | 76.6% |
| 2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 82.7% | 76.7% |
| 2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 97.9% | 91.5% | 86.7% |
| 2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 97.9% | 92.1% | 89.5% |
| 2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 97.9% | 93.3% | 89.4% |
| 2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 98.0% | 92.6% | 90.2% |
| 2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 98.8% | 93.2% | 90.0% |
| 2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 98.9% | 92.1% | 88.4% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Ring Factory Elementary Primary School was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.