2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 47 | 47 | 50 | 54 | 53 | 58 | 58 | |||||||
Total Students: | 706 | 722 | 769 | 797 | 788 | 773 | 814 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 180 | 25.5% | 159 | 22.0% | 183 | 23.8% | 210 | 26.3% | 200 | 25.4% | 185 | 23.9% | 182 | 22.4% |
Grade 10: | 158 | 22.4% | 172 | 23.8% | 201 | 26.1% | 204 | 25.6% | 184 | 23.4% | 181 | 23.4% | 224 | 27.5% |
Grade 11: | 170 | 24.1% | 182 | 25.2% | 189 | 24.6% | 183 | 23.0% | 176 | 22.3% | 217 | 28.1% | 196 | 24.1% |
Grade 12: | 198 | 28.0% | 209 | 28.9% | 196 | 25.5% | 200 | 25.1% | 228 | 28.9% | 190 | 24.6% | 212 | 26.0% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 369 | 52.3% | 370 | 51.2% | 402 | 52.3% | 388 | 48.7% | 396 | 50.3% | 384 | 49.7% | 399 | 49.0% |
Female: | 337 | 47.7% | 352 | 48.8% | 367 | 47.7% | 409 | 51.3% | 384 | 48.7% | 381 | 49.3% | 411 | 50.5% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 9 | 1.3% | 9 | 1.2% | 11 | 1.4% | 8 | 1.0% | 7 | 0.9% | 8 | 1.0% | 6 | 0.7% |
Asian: | 7 | 1.0% | 7 | 1.0% | 7 | 0.9% | 5 | 0.6% | 11 | 1.4% | 10 | 1.3% | 10 | 1.2% |
Hispanic: | 22 | 3.1% | 22 | 3.0% | 20 | 2.6% | 17 | 2.1% | 15 | 1.9% | 17 | 2.2% | 13 | 1.6% |
Black: | 5 | 0.7% | 4 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.3% | 4 | 0.5% | 5 | 0.6% | 8 | 1.0% | 3 | 0.4% |
White: | 643 | 91.1% | 661 | 91.6% | 712 | 92.6% | 743 | 93.2% | 750 | 95.2% | 730 | 94.4% | 782 | 96.1% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 20 | 2.8% | 19 | 2.6% | 17 | 2.2% | 20 | 2.5% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 210 | 29.7% | 200 | 27.7% | 223 | 29.0% | 220 | 27.6% | 161 | 20.4% | 150 | 19.4% | 127 | 15.6% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 62 | 8.8% | 58 | 8.0% | 70 | 9.1% | 61 | 7.7% | 70 | 8.9% | 65 | 8.4% | 59 | 7.2% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 15.00 | 15.35 | 15.36 | 14.68 | 14.86 | 13.40 | 14.00 |
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
WKCE | ||||||
2004 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 74% | N/A |
2005 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2006 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2007 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | N/A |
2008 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 70% | 70% | N/A |
2009 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | N/A |
2010 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 71% | 71% | N/A |
2011 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2012 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2013 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 69% | 69% | N/A |
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 57% | 57% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 77% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90% | 90% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 35% | 35% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 74% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | N/A |
2004 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 80% | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | N/A |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Rice Lake High High School was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.