USA.com / Connecticut / Hartford County / Enfield, CT / 06082 / Public Schools / Prudence Crandall School
Prudence Crandall School
150 Brainard Rd Enfield CT, 06082, Hartford County Phone: 860-253-6464 Ranking:  (347 out of 765, top 45%)*Type: Regular Primary School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Grade 3 to Grade 5 School District: Enfield School District Title I Eligible School: No Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
| 2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
| Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
| Total Teachers: | 29 | 32 | 31 | 26 | 27 | 31 | 28 | |||||||
| Total Students: | 417 | 426 | 433 | 379 | 403 | 435 | 416 | |||||||
| Grade 3: | 142 | 34.1% | 140 | 32.9% | 145 | 33.5% | 57 | 15.0% | 52 | 12.9% | 56 | 12.9% | 60 | 14.4% |
| Grade 4: | 133 | 31.9% | 138 | 32.4% | 153 | 35.3% | 49 | 12.9% | 54 | 13.4% | 71 | 16.3% | 68 | 16.3% |
| Grade 5: | 142 | 34.1% | 148 | 34.7% | 134 | 30.9% | 55 | 14.5% | 70 | 17.4% | 71 | 16.3% | 65 | 15.6% |
| Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
| Male: | 210 | 50.4% | 219 | 51.4% | 230 | 53.1% | 179 | 47.2% | 194 | 48.1% | 206 | 47.4% | 206 | 49.5% |
| Female: | 207 | 49.6% | 207 | 48.6% | 203 | 46.9% | 200 | 52.8% | 201 | 49.9% | 221 | 50.8% | 206 | 49.5% |
| Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
| American Indian/Alaska Native: | 3 | 0.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.5% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% |
| Asian: | 13 | 3.1% | 15 | 3.5% | 22 | 5.1% | 14 | 3.7% | 17 | 4.2% | 18 | 4.1% | 11 | 2.6% |
| Hispanic: | 48 | 11.5% | 51 | 12.0% | 52 | 12.0% | 33 | 8.7% | 24 | 6.0% | 23 | 5.3% | 18 | 4.3% |
| Black: | 14 | 3.4% | 16 | 3.8% | 25 | 5.8% | 8 | 2.1% | 19 | 4.7% | 20 | 4.6% | 20 | 4.8% |
| White: | 305 | 73.1% | 313 | 73.5% | 307 | 70.9% | 307 | 81.0% | 342 | 84.9% | 373 | 85.7% | 366 | 88.0% |
| Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 2 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.3% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Two or More Races: | 32 | 7.7% | 31 | 7.3% | 26 | 6.0% | 14 | 3.7% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
| Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 118 | 28.3% | 133 | 31.2% | 125 | 28.9% | 55 | 14.5% | 62 | 15.4% | 64 | 14.7% | 56 | 13.5% |
| Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 43 | 10.3% | 34 | 8.0% | 33 | 7.6% | 27 | 7.1% | 32 | 7.9% | 39 | 9.0% | 26 | 6.3% |
| Student-Teacher Ratio: | 14.33 | 13.52 | 13.79 | 14.75 | 15.19 | 15.20 | 15.10 | |||||||
Test Performance
| Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
| CMT | ||||||
| 2006 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 84.9% | 78.3% |
| 2007 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 85.8% | 80.1% |
| 2008 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 83% | 80.7% |
| 2009 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 91.3% | 82.8% |
| 2010 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.7% | 94.4% | 83.6% |
| 2011 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 93.9% | 84.3% |
| 2012 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 97.1% | 95.1% | 85.8% |
| 2013 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 92.8% | 82.7% |
| 2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 75.7% | 69.2% |
| 2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 73.6% | 69.3% |
| 2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 65.5% | 68.4% |
| 2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 76.3% | 71.1% |
| 2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.5% | 79.4% | 72.3% |
| 2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 79.5% | 74% |
| 2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 79.4% | 79.8% | 74.5% |
| 2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.4% | 78.1% | 72.4% |
| 2006 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 88.2% | 81.7% |
| 2007 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 78.5% | 81.1% | 82.4% |
| 2008 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 75.8% | 82.9% |
| 2009 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.6% | 84.5% | 83.2% |
| 2010 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 80.4% | 80.3% |
| 2011 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93% | 84.3% | 81.1% |
| 2012 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 86.5% | 83.2% |
| 2013 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.7% | 84.6% | 80.4% |
| 2006 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 89.2% | 80.3% |
| 2007 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.6% | 89.1% | 80.9% |
| 2008 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.1% | 88% | 81.5% |
| 2009 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91.6% | 84.6% |
| 2010 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 92.5% | 85.2% |
| 2011 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 92.9% | 85.2% |
| 2012 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.9% | 92.6% | 85.8% |
| 2013 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.2% | 93.2% | 83.8% |
| 2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 75.4% | 75.9% | 71.8% |
| 2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 65.6% | 77.8% | 70.6% |
| 2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 71% | 74.7% | 69.7% |
| 2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 78.4% | 74.4% |
| 2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 80.4% | 76.5% | 72.9% |
| 2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 78.3% | 74.7% |
| 2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 85.3% | 78.3% |
| 2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 83.6% | 77.6% |
| 2006 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 88% | 84.2% |
| 2007 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 70.3% | 85.1% | 84.1% |
| 2008 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.2% | 86.2% | 84.8% |
| 2009 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 87.5% | 85% |
| 2010 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.2% | 91.1% | 86.5% |
| 2011 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.9% | 86.5% | 85.4% |
| 2012 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 88.4% | 83.7% |
| 2013 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.1% | 84.1% | 83.5% |
| 2006 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.6% | 86.9% | 80.8% |
| 2007 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 90.1% | 82.5% |
| 2008 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 89.6% | 83.1% |
| 2009 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 92.4% | 85.9% |
| 2010 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 93.3% | 87.8% |
| 2011 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 93.4% | 87.6% |
| 2012 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 91.6% | 85.7% |
| 2013 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 91.9% | 84.4% |
| 2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 74.6% | 76.2% | 72.8% |
| 2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.6% | 81.4% | 73.4% |
| 2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 83.5% | 74% |
| 2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 84.3% | 77.7% |
| 2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.8% | 79.9% | 75.4% |
| 2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 81.9% | 75.1% |
| 2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 84.5% | 79.7% |
| 2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 79.7% | 86.6% | 79.1% |
| 2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 91% | 81.1% |
| 2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 90.5% | 82.9% |
| 2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 89.3% | 82.5% |
| 2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 89.8% | 82.4% |
| 2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.9% | 89.3% | 82.4% |
| 2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 91.1% | 81.7% |
| 2006 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 86.7% | 85.3% |
| 2007 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.6% | 87.4% | 85.7% |
| 2008 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 92.9% | 85.7% |
| 2009 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 89.7% | 86.5% |
| 2010 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 96.9% | 91.8% | 87.3% |
| 2011 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 93.3% | 88% |
| 2012 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 92.9% | 88.5% |
| 2013 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 94.5% | 87.7% |
| 2006 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 89.7% | 79.8% |
| 2007 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.7% | 90.8% | 82.7% |
| 2008 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.8% | 92.9% | 84.3% |
| 2009 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 96.1% | 86.8% |
| 2010 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 98.5% | 95.8% | 88.2% |
| 2011 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 100% | 96.9% | 88.5% |
| 2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 72.1% | 78.7% | 75.4% |
| 2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 84.5% | 75.7% |
| 2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 86.3% | 77.6% |
| 2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 90.2% | 80.3% |
| 2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 92.7% | 85.5% |
| 2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 98.3% | 94.1% | 86.5% |
| 2006 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 87.4% | 82.7% |
| 2007 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.8% | 89.9% | 83.8% |
| 2008 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 80.3% | 84.7% | 82.9% |
| 2009 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.6% | 91.1% | 83.1% |
| 2010 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 91% | 85.5% |
| 2011 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 92.5% | 86.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Prudence Crandall School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.