USA.com / Massachusetts / Middlesex County / Sudbury, MA / Public Schools / Peter Noyes Primary School
Peter Noyes Primary School
280 Old Sudbury Rd
Sudbury MA, 01776, Middlesex County
Phone: 978-443-1085
Ranking:
(53 out of 1,316, top 4%)*

Type: Regular Primary School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Prekindergarten to Grade 5
School District: Sudbury School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 40 | 43 | 43 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 42 | |||||||
Total Students: | 614 | 637 | 653 | 650 | 648 | 652 | 641 | |||||||
Prekindergarten: | 47 | 7.7% | 41 | 6.4% | 64 | 9.8% | 61 | 9.4% | 14 | 2.2% | 34 | 5.2% | 31 | 4.8% |
Kindergarten: | 78 | 12.7% | 103 | 16.2% | 80 | 12.3% | 69 | 10.6% | 92 | 14.2% | 93 | 14.3% | 87 | 13.6% |
Grade 1: | 95 | 15.5% | 91 | 14.3% | 85 | 13.0% | 104 | 16.0% | 103 | 15.9% | 103 | 15.8% | 100 | 15.6% |
Grade 2: | 91 | 14.8% | 84 | 13.2% | 106 | 16.2% | 109 | 16.8% | 110 | 17.0% | 100 | 15.3% | 101 | 15.8% |
Grade 3: | 87 | 14.2% | 105 | 16.5% | 108 | 16.5% | 111 | 17.1% | 106 | 16.4% | 101 | 15.5% | 110 | 17.2% |
Grade 4: | 106 | 17.3% | 106 | 16.6% | 109 | 16.7% | 102 | 15.7% | 103 | 15.9% | 113 | 17.3% | 109 | 17.0% |
Grade 5: | 110 | 17.9% | 107 | 16.8% | 101 | 15.5% | 94 | 14.5% | 120 | 18.5% | 108 | 16.6% | 103 | 16.1% |
Ungraded: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 305 | 49.7% | 327 | 51.3% | 347 | 53.1% | 346 | 53.2% | 334 | 51.5% | 341 | 52.3% | 337 | 52.6% |
Female: | 309 | 50.3% | 310 | 48.7% | 306 | 46.9% | 304 | 46.8% | 314 | 48.5% | 311 | 47.7% | 282 | 44.0% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% |
Asian: | 40 | 6.5% | 47 | 7.4% | 44 | 6.7% | 36 | 5.5% | 26 | 4.0% | 19 | 2.9% | 25 | 3.9% |
Hispanic: | 25 | 4.1% | 21 | 3.3% | 16 | 2.5% | 8 | 1.2% | 10 | 1.5% | 10 | 1.5% | 10 | 1.6% |
Black: | 12 | 2.0% | 14 | 2.2% | 14 | 2.1% | 12 | 1.8% | 9 | 1.4% | 7 | 1.1% | 9 | 1.4% |
White: | 506 | 82.4% | 523 | 82.1% | 548 | 83.9% | 575 | 88.5% | 585 | 90.3% | 601 | 92.2% | 578 | 90.2% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 31 | 5.0% | 31 | 4.9% | 30 | 4.6% | 18 | 2.8% | 17 | 2.6% | 14 | 2.1% | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 9 | 1.5% | 11 | 1.7% | 15 | 2.3% | 15 | 2.3% | 11 | 1.7% | 6 | 0.9% | 3 | 0.5% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 7 | 1.1% | 6 | 0.9% | 4 | 0.6% | 1 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.5% | 1 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.5% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 15.32 | 14.97 | 15.15 | 16.13 | 16.25 | 16.40 | 15.40 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
MCAS | ||||||
2003 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 83.5% | 82.6% | N/A |
2007 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 83% | 81% | 59% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 86% | 83% | 56% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 82% | 83% | 57% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 82% | 84% | 63% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 81% | 83% | 61% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 86% | 84% | 61% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 79% | 79% | 57% |
2006 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 80% | 79% | 52% |
2007 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 81% | 78% | 60% |
2008 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 80% | 83% | 61% |
2009 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 82% | 85% | 60% |
2010 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 85% | 87% | 65% |
2011 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 88% | 86% | 66% |
2012 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 76% | 78% | 61% |
2013 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 93% | 81% | 67% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 91% | 81% | 63% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 81% | 85% | 62% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 86% | 82% | 58% |
2003 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 80.0% | 80.8% | 56% |
2004 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 79% | 81% | 56% |
2005 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 79% | 76% | 50% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 76% | 79% | 50% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 83% | 87% | 56% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 71% | 73% | 49% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 81% | 82% | 53% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 80% | 84% | 54% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 72% | 81% | 53% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 82% | 84% | 57% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 84% | 84% | 53% |
2003 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 72.6% | 67.7% | 40% |
2004 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 65% | 71% | 42% |
2005 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 73% | 69% | 41% |
2006 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 68% | 73% | 40% |
2007 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 75% | 80% | 48% |
2008 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 77% | 73% | 49% |
2009 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 84% | 81% | 48% |
2010 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 75% | 79% | 48% |
2011 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 64% | 73% | 47% |
2012 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 76% | 77% | 51% |
2013 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 85% | 82% | 52% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 84% | 82% | 59% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 89% | 88% | 63% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 86% | 87% | 61% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 92% | 87% | 63% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 94% | 92% | 63% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 94% | 91% | 67% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 86% | 89% | 61% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 83% | 89% | 65% |
2006 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 66% | 64% | 43% |
2007 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 78% | 85% | 51% |
2008 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 84% | 85% | 52% |
2009 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 91% | 85% | 54% |
2010 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 89% | 88% | 55% |
2011 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 95% | 89% | 59% |
2012 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 83% | 86% | 57% |
2013 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 84% | 82% | 61% |
2003 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 80.00% | 77% | 52% |
2004 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 83% | 82% | 55% |
2005 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 68% | 69% | 51% |
2006 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 79% | 65% | 50% |
2007 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 78% | 79% | 51% |
2008 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 82% | 85% | 50% |
2009 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 70% | 74% | 49% |
2010 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 84% | 84% | 53% |
2011 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 84% | 85% | 50% |
2012 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 84% | 84% | 52% |
2013 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 80% | 82% | 51% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Peter Noyes Primary School was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.