USA.com / Texas / Tarrant County / Naval Air Station/ Jrb, TX / 76127 / Public Schools / Paschal High School
Paschal High School
3001 Forest Park Blvd Fort Worth TX, 76110, Tarrant County Phone: 817-814-5000 Ranking: ![]() Type: Regular High School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12 School District: Fort Worth Independent School District Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 160 | 143 | 147 | 141 | 134 | 142 | 132 | |||||||
Total Students: | 2,666 | 2,725 | 2,584 | 2,457 | 2,386 | 2,300 | 2,230 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 745 | 27.9% | 888 | 32.6% | 823 | 31.8% | 709 | 28.9% | 672 | 28.2% | 686 | 29.8% | 631 | 28.3% |
Grade 10: | 720 | 27.0% | 710 | 26.1% | 627 | 24.3% | 624 | 25.4% | 659 | 27.6% | 592 | 25.7% | 594 | 26.6% |
Grade 11: | 677 | 25.4% | 599 | 22.0% | 574 | 22.2% | 609 | 24.8% | 541 | 22.7% | 518 | 22.5% | 515 | 23.1% |
Grade 12: | 524 | 19.7% | 528 | 19.4% | 560 | 21.7% | 515 | 21.0% | 514 | 21.5% | 504 | 21.9% | 490 | 22.0% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 1,369 | 51.4% | 1,393 | 51.1% | 1,331 | 51.5% | 1,236 | 50.3% | 1,181 | 49.5% | 1,136 | 49.4% | 1,110 | 49.8% |
Female: | 1,297 | 48.6% | 1,332 | 48.9% | 1,253 | 48.5% | 1,221 | 49.7% | 1,197 | 50.2% | 1,156 | 50.3% | 1,116 | 50.0% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 9 | 0.3% | 15 | 0.6% | 14 | 0.5% | 7 | 0.3% | 7 | 0.3% | 9 | 0.4% | 6 | 0.3% |
Asian: | 73 | 2.7% | 76 | 2.8% | 78 | 3.0% | 66 | 2.7% | 62 | 2.6% | 59 | 2.6% | 59 | 2.6% |
Hispanic: | 1,611 | 60.4% | 1,629 | 59.8% | 1,512 | 58.5% | 1,416 | 57.6% | 1,343 | 56.3% | 1,271 | 55.3% | 1,222 | 54.8% |
Black: | 184 | 6.9% | 197 | 7.2% | 165 | 6.4% | 163 | 6.6% | 178 | 7.5% | 161 | 7.0% | 152 | 6.8% |
White: | 741 | 27.8% | 778 | 28.6% | 781 | 30.2% | 773 | 31.5% | 796 | 33.4% | 800 | 34.8% | 791 | 35.5% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 2 | 0.1% | 3 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 46 | 1.7% | 27 | 1.0% | 32 | 1.2% | 31 | 1.3% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 1,132 | 42.5% | 1,172 | 43.0% | 1,060 | 41.0% | 997 | 40.6% | 902 | 37.8% | 725 | 31.5% | 687 | 30.8% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 117 | 4.4% | 124 | 4.6% | 123 | 4.8% | 118 | 4.8% | 106 | 4.4% | 134 | 5.8% | 116 | 5.2% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 16.63 | 19.01 | 17.55 | 17.42 | 17.79 | 16.20 | 16.90 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
STAAR EOC | ||||||
2012 | Algebra I | End of course | % met std | 68% | 78% | 83% |
2013 | Algebra I | End of course | % met std | 67% | 70% | 78% |
2012 | Algebra II | End of course | % met std | 100% | 74% | 65% |
2013 | Algebra II | End of course | % met std | 98% | 98% | 97% |
2012 | Biology | End of course | % met std | 87% | 81% | 87% |
2013 | Biology | End of course | % met std | 87% | 78% | 85% |
2012 | Chemistry | End of course | % met std | 48% | 43% | 54% |
2013 | Chemistry | End of course | % met std | 83% | 73% | 84% |
2012 | English I Reading | End of course | % met std | 54% | 55% | 68% |
2013 | English I Reading | End of course | % met std | 55% | 49% | 65% |
2012 | English I Writing | End of course | % met std | 31% | 37% | 55% |
2013 | English I Writing | End of course | % met std | 31% | 32% | 48% |
2012 | English II Reading | End of course | % met std | 97% | 86% | 61% |
2013 | English II Reading | End of course | % met std | 79% | 66% | 78% |
2012 | English II Writing | End of course | % met std | 88% | 71% | 46% |
2013 | English II Writing | End of course | % met std | 51% | 35% | 52% |
2013 | English III Reading | End of course | % met std | 98% | 94% | 63% |
2013 | English III Writing | End of course | % met std | 86% | 80% | 42% |
2012 | Geometry | End of course | % met std | 97% | 97% | 98% |
2013 | Geometry | End of course | % met std | 85% | 79% | 86% |
2012 | Physics | End of course | % met std | 44% | 51% | 61% |
2013 | Physics | End of course | % met std | 100% | 98% | 81% |
2012 | U.S. History | End of course | % met std | 54% | 64% | 63% |
2012 | World Geography | End of course | % met std | 82% | 71% | 81% |
2013 | World Geography | End of course | % met std | 75% | 67% | 75% |
2013 | World History | End of course | % met std | 74% | 61% | 70% |
TAKS | ||||||
2004 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 64% | 52% | N/A |
2005 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 59% | 45% | N/A |
2006 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 64% | 51% | N/A |
2007 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 61% | 48% | N/A |
2008 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 60% | 47% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 59% | 48% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 64% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 64% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 69% | 62% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 62% | 60% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 83% | 78% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 75% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 84% | 78% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 78% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92% | 84% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 91% | 87% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 59% | 50% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 54% | 39% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 61% | 47% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 57% | 41% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 61% | 47% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 68% | 50% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 73% | 63% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 64% | N/A |
2004 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 84% | 82% | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 82% | 77% | N/A |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 76% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 85% | 78% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 79% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 83% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 95% | 90% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 95% | 91% | N/A |
2004 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 86% | 77% | N/A |
2005 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 77% | 73% | N/A |
2006 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 77% | 68% | N/A |
2007 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 78% | 70% | N/A |
2008 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 77% | 65% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 76% | 70% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 85% | 81% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 90% | 84% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 86% | 84% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 85% | 83% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 89% | 83% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 89% | 82% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 91% | 86% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 96% | 89% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 96% | 91% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 82% | 75% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 78% | 69% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 72% | 64% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 74% | 64% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 76% | 67% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 83% | 75% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 91% | 87% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 90% | 84% | N/A |
2004 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98% | 96% | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 94% | 93% | N/A |
2006 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 95% | 91% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 94% | 89% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 95% | 89% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 96% | 94% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 97% | 97% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 99% | 97% | N/A |
2004 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 60% | 45% | N/A |
2005 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 62% | 45% | N/A |
2006 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 57% | 42% | N/A |
2007 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 57% | 45% | N/A |
2008 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 58% | 44% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 67% | 53% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 73% | 62% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 71% | 61% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 79% | 74% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 77% | 74% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 87% | 80% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 85% | 77% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 83% | 73% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 88% | 80% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 91% | 87% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 88% | 81% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
Teacher's Experience and Compensation
2007 | |
Teachers with Bachelor Degree: | 63.6% |
Teachers with Master or PhD Degree: | 33.9% |
Mean Number of Years of Teaching: | 14.0 years |
Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | 23.1% |
Teachers with 6 Years of Experience or More: | 76.9% |
Mean Base Salary: | $50,085.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | $45,048.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 6 Years of Experience or More: | $51,601.0 |
* Paschal High School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.