Pacific High School
45525 Hwy 101 Port Orford OR, 97465, Curry County Phone: 541-348-2293 Ranking: (38 out of 279, top 14%)* Type: Regular High School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12 School District: Port Orford-Langlois School District 2J Title I Eligible School: No Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 7 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |||||||
Total Students: | 83 | 102 | 107 | 123 | 128 | 122 | 134 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 21 | 25.3% | 24 | 23.5% | 27 | 25.2% | 29 | 23.6% | 32 | 25.0% | 23 | 18.9% | 37 | 27.6% |
Grade 10: | 19 | 22.9% | 24 | 23.5% | 29 | 27.1% | 27 | 22.0% | 23 | 18.0% | 39 | 32.0% | 37 | 27.6% |
Grade 11: | 21 | 25.3% | 27 | 26.5% | 27 | 25.2% | 23 | 18.7% | 34 | 26.6% | 35 | 28.7% | 26 | 19.4% |
Grade 12: | 22 | 26.5% | 27 | 26.5% | 24 | 22.4% | 44 | 35.8% | 39 | 30.5% | 25 | 20.5% | 34 | 25.4% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 49 | 59.0% | 57 | 55.9% | 58 | 54.2% | 63 | 51.2% | 71 | 55.5% | 60 | 49.2% | 67 | 50.0% |
Female: | 34 | 41.0% | 45 | 44.1% | 49 | 45.8% | 60 | 48.8% | 49 | 38.3% | 52 | 42.6% | 62 | 46.3% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 1 | 1.2% | 1 | 1.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 1 | 1.2% | 1 | 1.0% | 1 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 2.3% | 5 | 4.1% | 5 | 3.7% |
Hispanic: | 9 | 10.8% | 11 | 10.8% | 9 | 8.4% | 8 | 6.5% | 4 | 3.1% | 4 | 3.3% | 3 | 2.2% |
Black: | 1 | 1.2% | 1 | 1.0% | 1 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
White: | 69 | 83.1% | 88 | 86.3% | 95 | 88.8% | 114 | 92.7% | 121 | 94.5% | 111 | 91.0% | 125 | 93.3% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.8% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 2 | 2.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 35 | 42.2% | 53 | 52.0% | 51 | 47.7% | 54 | 43.9% | 51 | 39.8% | 47 | 38.5% | 60 | 44.8% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 23 | 27.7% | 11 | 10.8% | 13 | 12.1% | 14 | 11.4% | 17 | 13.3% | 17 | 13.9% | 12 | 9.0% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 11.08 | 13.01 | 13.65 | 12.88 | 12.60 | 11.50 | 11.70 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OAKS | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 48.4% | 46.9% | 43.2% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 48.3% | 48.3% | 46.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 53.8% | 42.4% | 45% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 60% | 50% | 55% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 61.5% | 52% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 63% | 52.9% | 54% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 41.7% | 41.7% | 53.6% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 70.6% | 68% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 83.3% | 66% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 54.2% | 54.2% | 69% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 54.8% | 53.1% | 50.5% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 55.2% | 55.2% | 53.5% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 54.5% | 55% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 80.8% | 66% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 82.1% | 65% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 64.7% | 66% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | 66.1% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 95% | 95% | 83% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | > 95.0% | 84% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 83.3% | 85% |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.5% | 64.5% | 59.1% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.1% | 62.1% | 60.5% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 60.6% | 62% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 71.8% | 57% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 67.6% | 58% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | > 95.0% | 70% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 83.3% | 64% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 62.5% | 63% |
2004 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.5% | 65.6% | 48% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 63% | 63% | 54.4% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 63.6% | 55% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 50% | 42.3% | 55% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.5% | 64.1% | N/A |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.8% | 72.7% | 55% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.1% | 61.1% | 53.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | > 95.0% | 68% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 82.6% | 67% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 66.7% | 60% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Pacific High School was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.