USA.com / Connecticut / New London County / Uncasville, CT / Public Schools / Oswegatchie Elementary School
Oswegatchie Elementary School
470 Boston Post Rd
Waterford CT, 06385, New London County
Phone: 860-442-4331
Ranking: (380 out of 765, top 50%)*
Type: Regular Primary School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Kindergarten to Grade 5
School District: Waterford School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 33 | 32 | 32 | 33 | 35 | 25 | 22 | |||||||
Total Students: | 374 | 394 | 399 | 404 | 436 | 268 | 286 | |||||||
Kindergarten: | 39 | 10.4% | 39 | 9.9% | 46 | 11.5% | 46 | 11.4% | 56 | 12.8% | 26 | 9.7% | 19 | 6.6% |
Grade 1: | 63 | 16.8% | 67 | 17.0% | 70 | 17.5% | 70 | 17.3% | 67 | 15.4% | 41 | 15.3% | 37 | 12.9% |
Grade 2: | 63 | 16.8% | 74 | 18.8% | 73 | 18.3% | 65 | 16.1% | 77 | 17.7% | 40 | 14.9% | 58 | 20.3% |
Grade 3: | 71 | 19.0% | 69 | 17.5% | 65 | 16.3% | 75 | 18.6% | 70 | 16.1% | 55 | 20.5% | 58 | 20.3% |
Grade 4: | 67 | 17.9% | 70 | 17.8% | 71 | 17.8% | 69 | 17.1% | 86 | 19.7% | 54 | 20.1% | 57 | 19.9% |
Grade 5: | 71 | 19.0% | 75 | 19.0% | 73 | 18.3% | 79 | 19.6% | 80 | 18.3% | 52 | 19.4% | 57 | 19.9% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 190 | 50.8% | 205 | 52.0% | 211 | 52.9% | 212 | 52.5% | 226 | 51.8% | 136 | 50.7% | 143 | 50.0% |
Female: | 184 | 49.2% | 189 | 48.0% | 188 | 47.1% | 192 | 47.5% | 202 | 46.3% | 124 | 46.3% | 139 | 48.6% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 1 | 0.3% | 2 | 0.5% | 1 | 0.3% | 2 | 0.5% | 2 | 0.5% | 5 | 1.9% | 5 | 1.7% |
Asian: | 20 | 5.3% | 20 | 5.1% | 22 | 5.5% | 27 | 6.7% | 33 | 7.6% | 20 | 7.5% | 29 | 10.1% |
Hispanic: | 35 | 9.4% | 32 | 8.1% | 25 | 6.3% | 20 | 5.0% | 19 | 4.4% | 12 | 4.5% | 13 | 4.5% |
Black: | 18 | 4.8% | 20 | 5.1% | 16 | 4.0% | 16 | 4.0% | 15 | 3.4% | 12 | 4.5% | 15 | 5.2% |
White: | 281 | 75.1% | 312 | 79.2% | 328 | 82.2% | 339 | 83.9% | 367 | 84.2% | 219 | 81.7% | 224 | 78.3% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 19 | 5.1% | 8 | 2.0% | 7 | 1.8% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 63 | 16.8% | 54 | 13.7% | 49 | 12.3% | 32 | 7.9% | 42 | 9.6% | 15 | 5.6% | 15 | 5.2% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 11 | 2.9% | 14 | 3.6% | 11 | 2.8% | 22 | 5.4% | 15 | 3.4% | 6 | 2.2% | 7 | 2.4% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 11.18 | 12.22 | 12.52 | 12.24 | 12.49 | 11.80 | 12.80 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
CMT | ||||||
2006 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 89.9% | 78.3% |
2007 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 88.9% | 80.1% |
2008 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 89.6% | 80.7% |
2009 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 89.9% | 82.8% |
2010 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 97.1% | 93% | 83.6% |
2011 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 87.2% | 84.3% |
2012 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.2% | 93.4% | 85.8% |
2013 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 89.1% | 82.7% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.5% | 79.7% | 69.2% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.5% | 79.8% | 69.3% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.3% | 79.7% | 68.4% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80% | 79.1% | 71.1% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 79.6% | 72.3% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 77% | 82.3% | 74% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 82.1% | 74.5% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 81.8% | 72.4% |
2006 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 86.6% | 81.7% |
2007 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.9% | 88.4% | 82.4% |
2008 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 92.1% | 82.9% |
2009 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 91.6% | 83.2% |
2010 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.9% | 88% | 80.3% |
2011 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 89.7% | 81.1% |
2012 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.9% | 92.3% | 83.2% |
2013 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.0% | 89.2% | 80.4% |
2006 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 93% | 80.3% |
2007 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.5% | 86.2% | 80.9% |
2008 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 87.3% | 81.5% |
2009 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 89.4% | 84.6% |
2010 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 89.1% | 85.2% |
2011 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 93.6% | 85.2% |
2012 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.7% | 87% | 85.8% |
2013 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.4% | 89.2% | 83.8% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.7% | 81.7% | 71.8% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 80% | 70.6% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 75% | 78.7% | 69.7% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 83.8% | 74.4% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 82.6% | 72.9% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 87.1% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.1% | 85% | 78.3% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 86.3% | 77.6% |
2006 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 93.9% | 84.2% |
2007 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 86% | 85.8% | 84.1% |
2008 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 87.6% | 84.8% |
2009 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 91.5% | 85% |
2010 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 94.1% | 86.5% |
2011 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 95% | 85.4% |
2012 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.2% | 85.2% | 83.7% |
2013 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 97.2% | 93.6% | 83.5% |
2006 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.6% | 87.4% | 80.8% |
2007 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 92.1% | 82.5% |
2008 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 88.2% | 83.1% |
2009 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 83% | 87.7% | 85.9% |
2010 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 92.1% | 87.8% |
2011 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 95% | 94.1% | 87.6% |
2012 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.3% | 92.2% | 85.7% |
2013 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 88.0% | 84.4% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.6% | 83.5% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.1% | 83.7% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.1% | 82% | 74% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 80.8% | 83.7% | 77.7% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 83.7% | 75.4% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 83.3% | 75.1% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 87.3% | 79.7% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 80.3% | 84.6% | 79.1% |
2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 95.5% | 81.1% |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 87% | 82.9% |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 97.5% | 92.1% | 82.5% |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 93.7% | 82.4% |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 90.2% | 82.4% |
2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.7% | 85.6% | 81.7% |
2006 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 92.5% | 85.3% |
2007 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 93% | 85.7% |
2008 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 91.4% | 85.7% |
2009 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 89.3% | 86.5% |
2010 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 96.3% | 94.3% | 87.3% |
2011 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.7% | 96.4% | 88% |
2012 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 96.1% | 88.5% |
2013 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 88.9% | 87.7% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Oswegatchie Elementary School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.