New Urban High School
1901 Se Oak Grove Blvd
Portland OR, 97267, Clackamas County
Phone: 503-353-5925
Ranking: (261 out of 279, bottom 6%)*
Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: North Clackamas School District 12
Title I Eligible School: No
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 12 | 14 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 16 | 16 | |||||||
Total Students: | 170 | 157 | 164 | 187 | 178 | 213 | 248 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 21 | 12.4% | 25 | 15.9% | 9 | 5.5% | 25 | 13.4% | 14 | 7.9% | 18 | 8.5% | 22 | 8.9% |
Grade 10: | 28 | 16.5% | 26 | 16.6% | 34 | 20.7% | 42 | 22.5% | 49 | 27.5% | 52 | 24.4% | 58 | 23.4% |
Grade 11: | 39 | 22.9% | 35 | 22.3% | 44 | 26.8% | 50 | 26.7% | 52 | 29.2% | 61 | 28.6% | 74 | 29.8% |
Grade 12: | 82 | 48.2% | 71 | 45.2% | 77 | 47.0% | 70 | 37.4% | 63 | 35.4% | 82 | 38.5% | 94 | 37.9% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 96 | 56.5% | 91 | 58.0% | 100 | 61.0% | 117 | 62.6% | 100 | 56.2% | 118 | 55.4% | 127 | 51.2% |
Female: | 74 | 43.5% | 66 | 42.0% | 64 | 39.0% | 70 | 37.4% | 62 | 34.8% | 78 | 36.6% | 107 | 43.1% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 3 | 1.8% | 1 | 0.6% | 3 | 1.8% | 4 | 2.1% | 1 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.9% | 5 | 2.0% |
Asian: | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.6% | 1 | 0.6% | 1 | 0.5% | 3 | 1.7% | 6 | 2.8% | 1 | 0.4% |
Hispanic: | 23 | 13.5% | 14 | 8.9% | 23 | 14.0% | 23 | 12.3% | 16 | 9.0% | 15 | 7.0% | 17 | 6.9% |
Black: | 6 | 3.5% | 1 | 0.6% | 2 | 1.2% | 9 | 4.8% | 9 | 5.1% | 11 | 5.2% | 9 | 3.6% |
White: | 124 | 72.9% | 131 | 83.4% | 127 | 77.4% | 137 | 73.3% | 141 | 79.2% | 170 | 79.8% | 206 | 83.1% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 14 | 8.2% | 9 | 5.7% | 8 | 4.9% | 13 | 7.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 91 | 53.5% | 78 | 49.7% | 102 | 62.2% | 117 | 62.6% | 107 | 60.1% | 81 | 38.0% | 87 | 35.1% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 20 | 11.8% | 18 | 11.5% | 17 | 10.4% | 13 | 7.0% | 19 | 10.7% | 27 | 12.7% | 34 | 13.7% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 14.32 | 11.54 | 13.75 | 14.72 | 12.85 | 13.00 | 15.80 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OAKS | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 15.3% | 57.5% | 43.2% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 24.2% | 59.7% | 46.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 25.7% | 56.1% | 45% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 35.7% | 64.3% | 55% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 21.7% | 55.6% | 52% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 27.8% | 55.7% | 54% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 23.9% | 62.3% | 53.6% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 44.2% | 72.8% | 68% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 29.7% | 70.7% | 66% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 26.8% | 73.1% | 69% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 35.6% | 63.1% | 50.5% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 30.3% | 61.1% | 53.5% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 38.3% | 60.6% | 55% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 56.7% | 76.6% | 66% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 56.3% | 67.3% | 65% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 36.4% | 70.1% | 66% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 38.3% | 74% | 66.1% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.1% | 81.2% | 83% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 59% | 82.3% | 84% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 48.8% | 85.1% | 85% |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 29.2% | 65.2% | 59.1% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 40.9% | 62.7% | 60.5% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 38.5% | 66.3% | 62% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 37.7% | 56.1% | 57% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 27.8% | 54.5% | 58% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 17.6% | 62.5% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 37.5% | 73.8% | 70% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 45.9% | 67.3% | 64% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 29.7% | 66.3% | 63% |
2004 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 29% | 58.8% | 48% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 41.9% | 63.6% | 54.4% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 48.9% | 68.8% | 55% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 43.9% | 75.7% | 55% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 52.5% | 58.1% | N/A |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 27.7% | 60.4% | 55% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 25.6% | 57.5% | 53.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 45% | 69.7% | 68% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 35.3% | 68.2% | 67% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 5.6% | 65.9% | 60% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* New Urban High School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.