Manchester Essex Regional High School
36 Lincoln St
Manchester MA, 01944, Essex County
Phone: 978-526-4412
Ranking: (24 out of 298, top 8%)*
Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Manchester Essex Regional School District
Title I Eligible School: No
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 38 | 39 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 30 | |||||||
Total Students: | 461 | 480 | 470 | 461 | 439 | 415 | 621 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 118 | 25.6% | 125 | 26.0% | 121 | 25.7% | 123 | 26.7% | 117 | 26.7% | 107 | 25.8% | 114 | 18.4% |
Grade 10: | 116 | 25.2% | 125 | 26.0% | 126 | 26.8% | 113 | 24.5% | 110 | 25.1% | 109 | 26.3% | 100 | 16.1% |
Grade 11: | 115 | 24.9% | 116 | 24.2% | 110 | 23.4% | 116 | 25.2% | 110 | 25.1% | 102 | 24.6% | 98 | 15.8% |
Grade 12: | 112 | 24.3% | 114 | 23.8% | 113 | 24.0% | 109 | 23.6% | 102 | 23.2% | 97 | 23.4% | 94 | 15.1% |
Ungraded: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 223 | 48.4% | 228 | 47.5% | 223 | 47.4% | 219 | 47.5% | 211 | 48.1% | 207 | 49.9% | 299 | 48.1% |
Female: | 238 | 51.6% | 252 | 52.5% | 247 | 52.6% | 242 | 52.5% | 228 | 51.9% | 208 | 50.1% | 318 | 51.2% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% |
Hispanic: | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.3% |
Black: | 2 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.7% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% |
White: | 458 | 99.3% | 476 | 99.2% | 467 | 99.4% | 459 | 99.6% | 435 | 99.1% | 413 | 99.5% | 617 | 99.4% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 20 | 4.3% | 20 | 4.2% | 34 | 7.2% | 32 | 6.9% | 16 | 3.6% | 15 | 3.6% | 23 | 3.7% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 6 | 1.3% | 18 | 3.8% | 19 | 4.0% | 12 | 2.6% | 6 | 1.4% | 4 | 1.0% | 10 | 1.6% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 12.12 | 12.38 | 13.81 | 13.12 | 12.23 | 11.10 | 20.60 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
MCAS | ||||||
2003 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 89.9% | 88.9% | 61% |
2004 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 88% | 88% | 62% |
2005 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 88% | 88% | 65% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 92% | 92% | 70% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 94% | 91% | 71% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 99% | 97% | 74% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 99% | 98% | 81% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 98% | 96% | 78% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 90% | 85% | 84% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 97% | 97% | 88% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 98% | 97% | 91% |
2003 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 70.8% | 70.0% | 51% |
2004 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 86% | 85% | 57% |
2005 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 79% | 79% | 62% |
2006 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 89% | 88% | 67% |
2007 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 95% | 91% | 69% |
2008 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 98% | 97% | 72% |
2009 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 97% | 94% | 75% |
2010 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 94% | 92% | 75% |
2011 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 86% | 83% | 74% |
2012 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 97% | 96% | 78% |
2013 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 95% | 94% | 80% |
2008 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 10th Grade | % proficient | 87% | 84% | 57% |
2009 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 10th Grade | % proficient | 92% | 90% | 61% |
2010 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 10th Grade | % proficient | 92% | 90% | 65% |
2011 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 10th Grade | % proficient | 85% | 85% | 67% |
2012 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 10th Grade | % proficient | 93% | 93% | 69% |
2013 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 10th Grade | % proficient | 96% | 94% | 71% |
2003 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 90.4% | 92.2% | 66% |
2004 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 88% | 84% | 68% |
2005 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 86% | 84% | 66% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 87% | 86% | 65% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 88% | 85% | 69% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 78% | 76% | 69% |
2006 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 59% | 57% | 40% |
2007 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 70% | 69% | 46% |
2008 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 68% | 67% | 47% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 95% | 95% | 74% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 95% | 95% | 75% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 95% | 93% | 75% |
2003 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 81.8% | 59.8% | 37% |
2004 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 83% | 72% | 39% |
2005 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 76% | 75% | 39% |
2006 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 75% | 73% | 40% |
2007 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 73% | 71% | 45% |
2008 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 73% | 71% | 49% |
2003 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 40.9% | 41.1% | 32% |
2004 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 58% | 63% | 33% |
2005 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 55% | 54% | 33% |
2006 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 39% | 37% | 32% |
2007 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 55% | 53% | 33% |
2008 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 59% | 57% | 39% |
2007 | Biology | End of course | % proficient | 69% | 69% | 42% |
2008 | Biology | End of course | % proficient | 89% | 87% | 55% |
2009 | Biology | End of course | % proficient | 90% | 89% | 61% |
2010 | Biology | End of course | % proficient | 92% | 89% | 63% |
2011 | Biology | End of course | % proficient | 85% | 82% | 71% |
2012 | Biology | End of course | % proficient | 93% | 90% | 72% |
2013 | Biology | End of course | % proficient | 95% | 93% | 73% |
2007 | Technology/Engineering | End of course | % proficient | 64% | 64% | 35% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Manchester Essex Regional High School was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.