Logan High School
14470 State Route 328
Logan OH, 43138, Hocking County
Phone: 740-385-2069
Ranking:
(458 out of 821, bottom 44%)*

Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Logan-Hocking Local School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 59 | 62 | 59 | 61 | 67 | 69 | 68 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,107 | 1,115 | 1,046 | 1,096 | 1,104 | 1,262 | 1,341 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 311 | 28.1% | 325 | 29.1% | 302 | 28.9% | 350 | 31.9% | 315 | 28.5% | 282 | 22.3% | 310 | 23.1% |
Grade 10: | 323 | 29.2% | 300 | 26.9% | 316 | 30.2% | 301 | 27.5% | 275 | 24.9% | 312 | 24.7% | 346 | 25.8% |
Grade 11: | 227 | 20.5% | 248 | 22.2% | 223 | 21.3% | 202 | 18.4% | 252 | 22.8% | 340 | 26.9% | 355 | 26.5% |
Grade 12: | 246 | 22.2% | 242 | 21.7% | 205 | 19.6% | 243 | 22.2% | 262 | 23.7% | 328 | 26.0% | 330 | 24.6% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 586 | 52.9% | 559 | 50.1% | 551 | 52.7% | 563 | 51.4% | 549 | 49.7% | 619 | 49.0% | 664 | 49.5% |
Female: | 521 | 47.1% | 556 | 49.9% | 495 | 47.3% | 533 | 48.6% | 537 | 48.6% | 625 | 49.5% | 663 | 49.4% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 1 | 0.1% | 3 | 0.3% | 3 | 0.3% | 3 | 0.3% | 2 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.2% |
Asian: | 6 | 0.5% | 5 | 0.4% | 5 | 0.5% | 5 | 0.5% | 3 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% |
Hispanic: | 6 | 0.5% | 5 | 0.4% | 4 | 0.4% | 5 | 0.5% | 3 | 0.3% | 5 | 0.4% | 3 | 0.2% |
Black: | 5 | 0.5% | 6 | 0.5% | 6 | 0.6% | 4 | 0.4% | 5 | 0.5% | 5 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.1% |
White: | 1,073 | 96.9% | 1,085 | 97.3% | 1,019 | 97.4% | 1,073 | 97.9% | 1,081 | 97.9% | 1,238 | 98.1% | 1,323 | 98.7% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 15 | 1.4% | 11 | 1.0% | 9 | 0.9% | 6 | 0.5% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 594 | 53.7% | 566 | 50.8% | 423 | 40.4% | 473 | 43.2% | 444 | 40.2% | 416 | 33.0% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 119 | 10.7% | 118 | 10.6% | 103 | 9.8% | 81 | 7.4% | 88 | 8.0% | 104 | 8.2% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 18.73 | 18.08 | 17.66 | 18.09 | 16.51 | 18.30 | 19.80 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 71.2% | 71.2% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 86.8% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 87.3% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.4% | 84.4% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 87.5% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 89.6% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.2% | 91.2% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 86.2% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 89.6% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 79.2% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 88.3% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 89.4% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.9% | 84.9% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 86.8% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 83.8% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 93.3% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.5% | 86.5% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 87.9% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.3% | 64.3% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.8% | 76.8% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.2% | 80.2% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.6% | 77.6% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 77.8% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 79.9% | 79.9% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.9% | 84.9% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 79.6% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 69% | 69% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 81.9% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 87.3% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.7% | 82.7% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.5% | 84.5% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.4% | 80.4% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 79.6% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.2% | 83.2% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 83.6% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 75.7% | 75.7% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 89.4% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 90.5% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.6% | 85.6% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 88.2% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 85.4% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.8% | 90.8% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.5% | 85.5% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.2% | 83.2% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 92.6% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 91.5% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 92.6% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 92.9% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 95.2% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 95.1% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 93.4% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 94.9% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 95.3% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 93.5% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 92.6% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 92.4% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 95.1% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 94.4% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 89.4% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.6% | 90.6% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 87.3% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 87.5% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 85.1% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 90.1% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 89.4% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.6% | 90.6% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 92.5% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 93.5% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 90.9% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 90.4% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 88.3% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.0% | 90.0% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 94.9% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 94.4% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 93.8% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.6% | 93.6% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 96.4% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.3% | 94.3% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 91.1% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Logan High School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.