Little Elm High School
1900 Walker Ln
Little Elm TX, 75068, Denton County
Phone: 972-292-1840
Ranking:
(857 out of 1,337, bottom 36%)*

Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Little Elm Independent School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 101 | 89 | 82 | 92 | 90 | 84 | 78 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,736 | 1,633 | 1,601 | 1,563 | 1,486 | 1,414 | 1,322 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 611 | 35.2% | 523 | 32.0% | 479 | 29.9% | 469 | 30.0% | 435 | 29.3% | 416 | 29.4% | 436 | 33.0% |
Grade 10: | 490 | 28.2% | 398 | 24.4% | 438 | 27.4% | 445 | 28.5% | 392 | 26.4% | 380 | 26.9% | 347 | 26.2% |
Grade 11: | 299 | 17.2% | 379 | 23.2% | 331 | 20.7% | 316 | 20.2% | 356 | 24.0% | 328 | 23.2% | 294 | 22.2% |
Grade 12: | 336 | 19.4% | 333 | 20.4% | 353 | 22.0% | 333 | 21.3% | 303 | 20.4% | 290 | 20.5% | 245 | 18.5% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 920 | 53.0% | 854 | 52.3% | 819 | 51.2% | 801 | 51.2% | 777 | 52.3% | 747 | 52.8% | 678 | 51.3% |
Female: | 816 | 47.0% | 779 | 47.7% | 782 | 48.8% | 762 | 48.8% | 701 | 47.2% | 659 | 46.6% | 640 | 48.4% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 8 | 0.5% | 3 | 0.2% | 5 | 0.3% | 8 | 0.5% | 8 | 0.5% | 14 | 1.0% | 12 | 0.9% |
Asian: | 42 | 2.4% | 38 | 2.3% | 33 | 2.1% | 36 | 2.3% | 38 | 2.6% | 36 | 2.5% | 32 | 2.4% |
Hispanic: | 658 | 37.9% | 622 | 38.1% | 586 | 36.6% | 561 | 35.9% | 519 | 34.9% | 478 | 33.8% | 436 | 33.0% |
Black: | 317 | 18.3% | 274 | 16.8% | 274 | 17.1% | 270 | 17.3% | 275 | 18.5% | 227 | 16.1% | 200 | 15.1% |
White: | 674 | 38.8% | 664 | 40.7% | 663 | 41.4% | 650 | 41.6% | 646 | 43.5% | 659 | 46.6% | 642 | 48.6% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 3 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 36 | 2.1% | 31 | 1.9% | 37 | 2.3% | 35 | 2.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 656 | 37.8% | 546 | 33.4% | 526 | 32.9% | 512 | 32.8% | 445 | 29.9% | 363 | 25.7% | 299 | 22.6% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 176 | 10.1% | 126 | 7.7% | 113 | 7.1% | 113 | 7.2% | 116 | 7.8% | 102 | 7.2% | 87 | 6.6% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 17.24 | 18.26 | 19.50 | 16.94 | 16.43 | 16.80 | 17.00 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
STAAR EOC | ||||||
2012 | Algebra I | End of course | % met std | 59% | 71% | 83% |
2013 | Algebra I | End of course | % met std | 70% | 77% | 78% |
2013 | Algebra II | End of course | % met std | 98% | 98% | 97% |
2012 | Biology | End of course | % met std | 92% | 92% | 87% |
2013 | Biology | End of course | % met std | 85% | 85% | 85% |
2013 | Chemistry | End of course | % met std | 87% | 87% | 84% |
2012 | English I Reading | End of course | % met std | 65% | 65% | 68% |
2013 | English I Reading | End of course | % met std | 58% | 58% | 65% |
2012 | English I Writing | End of course | % met std | 48% | 48% | 55% |
2013 | English I Writing | End of course | % met std | 40% | 40% | 48% |
2013 | English II Reading | End of course | % met std | 70% | 70% | 78% |
2013 | English II Writing | End of course | % met std | 37% | 37% | 52% |
2012 | English III Reading | End of course | % met std | 40% | 40% | 50% |
2012 | English III Writing | End of course | % met std | 28% | 28% | 38% |
2012 | Geometry | End of course | % met std | 99% | 99% | 98% |
2013 | Geometry | End of course | % met std | 82% | 82% | 86% |
2012 | World Geography | End of course | % met std | 81% | 81% | 81% |
2013 | World Geography | End of course | % met std | 72% | 72% | 75% |
2013 | World History | End of course | % met std | 60% | 60% | 70% |
TAKS | ||||||
2004 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 70% | 70% | N/A |
2005 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 63% | 63% | N/A |
2006 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 64% | 64% | N/A |
2007 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 57% | 57% | N/A |
2008 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 63% | 63% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 67% | 67% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 68% | 68% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 54% | 54% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90% | 90% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 56% | 56% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 56% | 56% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 51% | 51% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 64% | 64% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2004 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | N/A |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 90% | 90% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 94% | 94% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 95% | 95% | N/A |
2004 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | N/A |
2005 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2006 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 73% | 73% | N/A |
2007 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2008 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 94% | 94% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 90% | 90% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93% | 93% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 96% | 96% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 74% | 74% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 93% | 93% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 90% | 90% | N/A |
2004 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 99% | 99% | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 96% | 96% | N/A |
2006 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 94% | 94% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 97% | 97% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98% | 98% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98% | 98% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98% | 98% | N/A |
2004 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 46% | 46% | N/A |
2005 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 52% | 52% | N/A |
2006 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 64% | 64% | N/A |
2007 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 62% | 62% | N/A |
2008 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 64% | 64% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 65% | 65% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 71% | 71% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 90% | 90% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 93% | 93% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 94% | 94% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
Teacher's Experience and Compensation
2007 | |
Teachers with Bachelor Degree: | 80.0% |
Teachers with Master or PhD Degree: | 20.0% |
Mean Number of Years of Teaching: | 8.0 years |
Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | 47.7% |
Teachers with 6 Years of Experience or More: | 52.3% |
Mean Base Salary: | $41,003.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | $37,228.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 6 Years of Experience or More: | $44,445.0 |
* Little Elm High School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.