USA.com / New Hampshire / Grafton County / Lisbon, NH / 03585 / Public Schools / Lisbon Regional School (Elem) / Test Performance
Lisbon Regional School (Elem), Test Performance
| Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
| NECAP | ||||||
| 2006 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 51% | 51% | 68% |
| 2007 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 63% | 63% | 69% |
| 2008 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94% | 94% | 73% |
| 2009 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68% | 68% | 72% |
| 2010 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 76% |
| 2011 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | 76% |
| 2012 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 76% |
| 2013 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | 74% |
| 2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 48% | 48% | 71% |
| 2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | 75% |
| 2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | 77% |
| 2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68% | 68% | 78% |
| 2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68% | 68% | 80% |
| 2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | 80% |
| 2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 81% |
| 2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 78% |
| 2006 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 39% | 39% | 65% |
| 2007 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 35% | 35% | 66% |
| 2008 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | 68% |
| 2009 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 73% |
| 2010 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | 75% |
| 2011 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 71% | 71% | 74% |
| 2012 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | 76% |
| 2013 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 77% |
| 2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 50% | 50% | 69% |
| 2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 45% | 45% | 72% |
| 2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | 74% |
| 2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 75% |
| 2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | 75% |
| 2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 74% | 74% | 77% |
| 2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 79% |
| 2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 66% | 66% | 78% |
| 2006 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 48% | 48% | 63% |
| 2007 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 63% | 63% | 67% |
| 2008 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 40% | 40% | 69% |
| 2009 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | 73% |
| 2010 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 75% |
| 2011 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 50% | 50% | 73% |
| 2012 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 62% | 62% | 76% |
| 2013 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 57% | 57% | 74% |
| 2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 62% | 62% | 67% |
| 2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 67% | 67% | 72% |
| 2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 54% | 54% | 71% |
| 2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | 76% |
| 2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | 79% |
| 2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | 78% |
| 2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 77% |
| 2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 77% |
| 2006 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 61% | 61% | 51% |
| 2007 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 43% | 43% | 50% |
| 2008 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 37% | 37% | 52% |
| 2009 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | 60% |
| 2011 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 61% | 61% | 56% |
| 2012 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 55% | 55% | 55% |
| 2013 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 65% | 65% | 58% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Lisbon Regional School (Elem), Test Performance was rated 3 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.