Lamar Cons High School
4606 Mustang Ave
Rosenberg TX, 77471, Fort Bend County
Phone: 832-223-3000
Ranking:
(872 out of 1,337, bottom 35%)*

Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Lamar Consolidated Independent School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 94 | 83 | 93 | 107 | 117 | 114 | 108 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,527 | 1,486 | 1,680 | 1,828 | 2,142 | 2,047 | 1,943 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 465 | 30.5% | 426 | 28.7% | 485 | 28.9% | 465 | 25.4% | 680 | 31.7% | 650 | 31.8% | 615 | 31.7% |
Grade 10: | 343 | 22.5% | 402 | 27.1% | 379 | 22.6% | 368 | 20.1% | 534 | 24.9% | 514 | 25.1% | 486 | 25.0% |
Grade 11: | 381 | 25.0% | 361 | 24.3% | 323 | 19.2% | 498 | 27.2% | 476 | 22.2% | 448 | 21.9% | 407 | 20.9% |
Grade 12: | 338 | 22.1% | 297 | 20.0% | 493 | 29.3% | 497 | 27.2% | 452 | 21.1% | 435 | 21.3% | 435 | 22.4% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 757 | 49.6% | 758 | 51.0% | 871 | 51.8% | 924 | 50.5% | 1,085 | 50.7% | 1,022 | 49.9% | 941 | 48.4% |
Female: | 770 | 50.4% | 728 | 49.0% | 809 | 48.2% | 904 | 49.5% | 1,049 | 49.0% | 1,017 | 49.7% | 998 | 51.4% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 4 | 0.3% | 4 | 0.3% | 6 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% |
Asian: | 77 | 5.0% | 77 | 5.2% | 87 | 5.2% | 91 | 5.0% | 144 | 6.7% | 119 | 5.8% | 111 | 5.7% |
Hispanic: | 754 | 49.4% | 763 | 51.3% | 788 | 46.9% | 812 | 44.4% | 889 | 41.5% | 856 | 41.8% | 827 | 42.6% |
Black: | 410 | 26.9% | 382 | 25.7% | 435 | 25.9% | 480 | 26.3% | 554 | 25.9% | 543 | 26.5% | 513 | 26.4% |
White: | 268 | 17.6% | 249 | 16.8% | 354 | 21.1% | 431 | 23.6% | 553 | 25.8% | 528 | 25.8% | 491 | 25.3% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 13 | 0.9% | 11 | 0.7% | 10 | 0.6% | 12 | 0.7% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 744 | 48.7% | 801 | 53.9% | 726 | 43.2% | 800 | 43.8% | 800 | 37.3% | 739 | 36.1% | 631 | 32.5% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 100 | 6.5% | 125 | 8.4% | 107 | 6.4% | 117 | 6.4% | 150 | 7.0% | 133 | 6.5% | 144 | 7.4% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 16.28 | 17.91 | 18.09 | 17.15 | 18.25 | 17.90 | 18.00 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
STAAR EOC | ||||||
2012 | Algebra I | End of course | % met std | 74% | 80% | 83% |
2013 | Algebra I | End of course | % met std | 73% | 80% | 78% |
2013 | Algebra II | End of course | % met std | 100% | 99% | 97% |
2012 | Biology | End of course | % met std | 84% | 90% | 87% |
2013 | Biology | End of course | % met std | 81% | 87% | 85% |
2013 | Chemistry | End of course | % met std | 82% | 81% | 84% |
2012 | English I Reading | End of course | % met std | 68% | 74% | 68% |
2013 | English I Reading | End of course | % met std | 61% | 75% | 65% |
2012 | English I Writing | End of course | % met std | 54% | 62% | 55% |
2013 | English I Writing | End of course | % met std | 45% | 55% | 48% |
2013 | English II Reading | End of course | % met std | 75% | 85% | 78% |
2013 | English II Writing | End of course | % met std | 48% | 62% | 52% |
2012 | English III Reading | End of course | % met std | 74% | 68% | 50% |
2012 | English III Writing | End of course | % met std | 59% | 56% | 38% |
2013 | English III Writing | End of course | % met std | 28% | 24% | 42% |
2012 | Geometry | End of course | % met std | 100% | 99% | 98% |
2013 | Geometry | End of course | % met std | 82% | 86% | 86% |
2012 | World Geography | End of course | % met std | 77% | 83% | 81% |
2013 | World Geography | End of course | % met std | 64% | 76% | 75% |
2013 | World History | End of course | % met std | 60% | 71% | 70% |
TAKS | ||||||
2004 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 59% | 63% | N/A |
2005 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 53% | 59% | N/A |
2006 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 60% | 58% | N/A |
2007 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 59% | 62% | N/A |
2008 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 67% | 66% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 66% | 70% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 77% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 66% | 78% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 74% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 63% | 69% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 84% | 86% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 87% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 88% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 91% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 91% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 93% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 57% | 63% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 46% | 52% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 58% | 60% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 48% | 56% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 64% | 69% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 63% | 70% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 71% | 75% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 70% | 80% | N/A |
2004 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 82% | 86% | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 85% | N/A |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 84% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 84% | 88% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 92% | 93% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 91% | 92% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 95% | 95% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 92% | 95% | N/A |
2004 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 85% | 83% | N/A |
2005 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 81% | 80% | N/A |
2006 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 76% | 78% | N/A |
2007 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2008 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 84% | 81% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 83% | 85% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 90% | 91% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 88% | 90% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 87% | 84% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 88% | 86% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 85% | 88% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93% | 93% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93% | 95% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95% | 95% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95% | 96% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 84% | 83% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 77% | 78% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 66% | 73% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 75% | 76% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 76% | 81% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 84% | 89% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 91% | 93% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 88% | 92% | N/A |
2004 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98% | 97% | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 97% | 94% | N/A |
2006 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 96% | 95% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 93% | 94% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98% | 97% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 99% | 98% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 99% | 99% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 100% | 99% | N/A |
2004 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 56% | 61% | N/A |
2005 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 63% | 58% | N/A |
2006 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 53% | 55% | N/A |
2007 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 55% | 60% | N/A |
2008 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 61% | 64% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 70% | 68% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 71% | 75% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 72% | 74% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 86% | 84% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 83% | 87% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 87% | 88% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 92% | 94% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 89% | 92% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
Teacher's Experience and Compensation
2007 | |
Teachers with Bachelor Degree: | 76.5% |
Teachers with Master or PhD Degree: | 22.4% |
Mean Number of Years of Teaching: | 14.0 years |
Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | 29.4% |
Teachers with 6 Years of Experience or More: | 70.6% |
Mean Base Salary: | $49,731.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | $42,802.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 6 Years of Experience or More: | $52,618.0 |
* Lamar Cons High School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.