301 Liberty St Lagrange OH, 44050, Lorain County Phone: 440-355-5133 Ranking: ![]() Type: Regular Middle School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Grade 6 to Grade 8 School District: Keystone Local School District Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 25 | 26 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 31 | 31 | |||||||
Total Students: | 396 | 398 | 544 | 557 | 543 | 540 | 552 | |||||||
Grade 6: | 129 | 32.6% | 119 | 29.9% | 142 | 26.1% | 139 | 25.0% | 127 | 23.4% | 138 | 25.6% | 130 | 23.6% |
Grade 7: | 126 | 31.8% | 138 | 34.7% | 140 | 25.7% | 136 | 24.4% | 143 | 26.3% | 135 | 25.0% | 142 | 25.7% |
Grade 8: | 141 | 35.6% | 141 | 35.4% | 140 | 25.7% | 145 | 26.0% | 139 | 25.6% | 142 | 26.3% | 155 | 28.1% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 208 | 52.5% | 199 | 50.0% | 265 | 48.7% | 285 | 51.2% | 264 | 48.6% | 262 | 48.5% | 267 | 48.4% |
Female: | 188 | 47.5% | 199 | 50.0% | 279 | 51.3% | 272 | 48.8% | 259 | 47.7% | 260 | 48.1% | 271 | 49.1% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 2 | 0.5% | 4 | 1.0% | 3 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.5% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 3 | 0.8% | 3 | 0.8% | 5 | 0.9% | 3 | 0.5% | 2 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.2% |
Hispanic: | 10 | 2.5% | 5 | 1.3% | 12 | 2.2% | 11 | 2.0% | 7 | 1.3% | 4 | 0.7% | 3 | 0.5% |
Black: | 1 | 0.3% | 2 | 0.5% | 4 | 0.7% | 4 | 0.7% | 2 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.5% |
White: | 367 | 92.7% | 376 | 94.5% | 504 | 92.6% | 524 | 94.1% | 519 | 95.6% | 523 | 96.9% | 535 | 96.9% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 13 | 3.3% | 8 | 2.0% | 16 | 2.9% | 12 | 2.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 98 | 24.7% | 99 | 24.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 104 | 19.2% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 30 | 7.6% | 36 | 9.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 35 | 6.4% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 15.84 | 15.61 | 17.00 | 17.41 | 16.97 | 17.40 | 17.80 |
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OAA | ||||||
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 66.9% | 66.9% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 64% | 64% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 78% | 77.4% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 58.3% | 58.2% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 82.9% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.7% | 68.7% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.0% | 80.5% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 80.8% | 81% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 86.2% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 90.4% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 83.1% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80.3% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 79.7% | 79.8% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 71.6% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.2% | 91.5% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 80.6% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 86.9% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 82.9% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 72% | 71.6% | N/A |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.0% | 93.2% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.4% | 62.4% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 78% | 77.4% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80.3% | N/A |
2004 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 87.5% | N/A |
2005 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.6% | 81.3% | N/A |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 66% | 65.5% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 80.6% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 75.7% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 82.5% | 82.8% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 83.9% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 84.4% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 83.8% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 72.6% | 72.1% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 80.3% | 80% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 85.8% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 85.1% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 86% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 91.8% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 90.5% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.6% | 85.9% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 92.3% | N/A |
2005 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.6% | 77% | N/A |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 69% | 69% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.6% | 85.6% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 78.1% | 78.1% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 78.6% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 83% | 81.8% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.5% | 86% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 87.2% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 81.2% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.9% | 89.9% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.3% | 86.3% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 81.9% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 87.8% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.4% | 86.1% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 88% | 87.5% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.7% | 88.7% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 78.0% | 78.2% | N/A |
2007 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 89.7% | N/A |
2008 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 94.9% | N/A |
2009 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 94.7% | N/A |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 61.7% | 62% | N/A |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 85.1% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 75.8% | 75.3% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 82.9% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.1% | 76.3% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.7% | 73.2% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 81.8% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 85.3% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 89.1% | 89.1% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 88.3% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 90.5% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 89.9% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 87.5% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 80.7% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 87% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 90.2% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 93.4% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 93.5% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 77.7% | 77.7% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 61.8% | 61.8% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 77.6% | 77.8% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.1% | 69.3% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.3% | 80.3% | N/A |
2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 83.1% | N/A |
2013 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 77.5% | 77.5% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 59.2% | 59.2% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 43% | 43% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 58.2% | 58.5% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Keystone Middle School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.