2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 37 | 37 | 40 | 43 | 42 | 43 | 42 | |||||||
Total Students: | 589 | 596 | 633 | 661 | 727 | 744 | 701 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 155 | 26.3% | 151 | 25.3% | 149 | 23.5% | 128 | 19.4% | 172 | 23.7% | 193 | 25.9% | 155 | 22.1% |
Grade 10: | 151 | 25.6% | 151 | 25.3% | 127 | 20.1% | 171 | 25.9% | 193 | 26.5% | 163 | 21.9% | 184 | 26.2% |
Grade 11: | 149 | 25.3% | 131 | 22.0% | 162 | 25.6% | 189 | 28.6% | 166 | 22.8% | 183 | 24.6% | 191 | 27.2% |
Grade 12: | 134 | 22.8% | 163 | 27.3% | 195 | 30.8% | 173 | 26.2% | 196 | 27.0% | 205 | 27.6% | 171 | 24.4% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 301 | 51.1% | 303 | 50.8% | 316 | 49.9% | 326 | 49.3% | 356 | 49.0% | 365 | 49.1% | 353 | 50.4% |
Female: | 288 | 48.9% | 293 | 49.2% | 317 | 50.1% | 335 | 50.7% | 363 | 49.9% | 371 | 49.9% | 344 | 49.1% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 6 | 1.0% | 7 | 1.2% | 6 | 0.9% | 8 | 1.2% | 6 | 0.8% | 10 | 1.3% | 12 | 1.7% |
Asian: | 5 | 0.8% | 4 | 0.7% | 3 | 0.5% | 1 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.3% | 2 | 0.3% | 5 | 0.7% |
Hispanic: | 11 | 1.9% | 17 | 2.9% | 12 | 1.9% | 14 | 2.1% | 11 | 1.5% | 11 | 1.5% | 9 | 1.3% |
Black: | 5 | 0.8% | 5 | 0.8% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.3% |
White: | 549 | 93.2% | 549 | 92.1% | 601 | 94.9% | 628 | 95.0% | 706 | 97.1% | 720 | 96.8% | 673 | 96.0% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 13 | 2.2% | 14 | 2.3% | 9 | 1.4% | 8 | 1.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 108 | 18.3% | 112 | 18.8% | 95 | 15.0% | 99 | 15.0% | 80 | 11.0% | 41 | 5.5% | 44 | 6.3% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 25 | 4.2% | 26 | 4.4% | 17 | 2.7% | 18 | 2.7% | 30 | 4.1% | 40 | 5.4% | 43 | 6.1% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 15.91 | 16.32 | 15.66 | 15.43 | 17.11 | 17.30 | 16.70 |
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
WKCE | ||||||
2004 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | N/A | N/A |
2005 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | N/A |
2007 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | N/A |
2008 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2009 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | N/A |
2010 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2011 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2012 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2013 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | N/A |
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | N/A | N/A |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 74% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 48% | 48% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | N/A | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 70% | 70% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 70% | 70% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 37% | 37% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 83% | N/A | N/A |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 70% | 70% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 74% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 73% | 73% | N/A |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | N/A |
2004 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | N/A | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | N/A |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | N/A |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Kewaskum High High School was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.