John L Nash Middle School
1134 East 3100 North Rd Clifton IL, 60927, Iroquois County Phone: 815-694-2323 Ranking: (627 out of 3,028, top 21%)* Type: Regular Middle School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Grade 5 to Grade 8 School District: Central Community Unit School District 4 Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 21 | 20 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 19 | |||||||
Total Students: | 341 | 315 | 311 | 320 | 322 | 325 | 343 | |||||||
Grade 5: | 85 | 24.9% | 75 | 23.8% | 83 | 26.7% | 85 | 26.6% | 68 | 21.1% | 76 | 23.4% | 78 | 22.7% |
Grade 6: | 83 | 24.3% | 86 | 27.3% | 85 | 27.3% | 68 | 21.3% | 78 | 24.2% | 79 | 24.3% | 82 | 23.9% |
Grade 7: | 88 | 25.8% | 85 | 27.0% | 67 | 21.5% | 77 | 24.1% | 90 | 28.0% | 83 | 25.5% | 84 | 24.5% |
Grade 8: | 85 | 24.9% | 69 | 21.9% | 75 | 24.1% | 90 | 28.1% | 86 | 26.7% | 87 | 26.8% | 99 | 28.9% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 182 | 53.4% | 159 | 50.5% | 155 | 49.8% | 170 | 53.1% | 163 | 50.6% | 142 | 43.7% | 193 | 56.3% |
Female: | 159 | 46.6% | 156 | 49.5% | 156 | 50.2% | 150 | 46.9% | 150 | 46.6% | 174 | 53.5% | 145 | 42.3% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 4 | 1.2% | 3 | 1.0% | 3 | 1.0% | 2 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.9% | 4 | 1.2% |
Hispanic: | 17 | 5.0% | 15 | 4.8% | 14 | 4.5% | 9 | 2.8% | 8 | 2.5% | 8 | 2.5% | 7 | 2.0% |
Black: | 4 | 1.2% | 5 | 1.6% | 5 | 1.6% | 5 | 1.6% | 8 | 2.5% | 10 | 3.1% | 8 | 2.3% |
White: | 301 | 88.3% | 280 | 88.9% | 274 | 88.1% | 292 | 91.3% | 303 | 94.1% | 303 | 93.2% | 323 | 94.2% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.3% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 15 | 4.4% | 12 | 3.8% | 15 | 4.8% | 11 | 3.4% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 109 | 32.0% | 88 | 27.9% | 62 | 19.9% | 101 | 31.6% | 96 | 29.8% | 85 | 26.2% | 68 | 19.8% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 20 | 5.9% | 36 | 11.4% | 65 | 20.9% | 15 | 4.7% | 10 | 3.1% | 15 | 4.6% | 15 | 4.4% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 16.24 | 15.92 | 13.52 | 13.33 | 13.42 | 13.50 | 18.10 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
ISAT | ||||||
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.6% | 86.6% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.7% | 82.7% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 93.4% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 97.4% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 98.6% | 98.6% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 95.3% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 92.7% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 57.9% | 57.9% | 59.4% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.5% | 69.5% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 67.9% | 67.9% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 93.4% | 73.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.4% | 84.4% | 73.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 95.6% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 91.6% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.9% | 93.9% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 65.8% | 65.8% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 86.7% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 80.0% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.9% | 93.9% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 89.4% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 97.3% | 97.3% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 98.5% | 98.5% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 95.4% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 63.1% | 63.1% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 86.7% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 80.0% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.7% | 87.7% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 89.4% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.6% | 86.6% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 96.9% | 96.9% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 96.6% | 96.6% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 69.1% | 69.1% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 80.2% | 80.2% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 95.2% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 96.4% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 92.1% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 96.3% | 96.3% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 97.1% | 97.1% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 91.6% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 70.8% | 70.8% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.8% | 85.8% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 85.7% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 86.8% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 93.1% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 91.3% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 92.9% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 75.9% | 75.9% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 81.3% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 81.3% | 74.4% |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.5% | 83.5% | 74.6% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 89.6% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 91.3% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 95.2% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 96.4% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 98.9% | 98.9% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 95.0% | 95.0% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 95.7% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 97.6% | 97.6% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 45.7% | 45.7% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 55.5% | 55.5% | 54.4% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 47.6% | 47.6% | 54.3% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 84.0% | 84.0% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 73.9% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 89.9% | 89.9% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 78.1% | 78.1% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 94.0% | 94.0% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 94.5% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 98.7% | 98.7% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 94.0% | 94.0% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 57.7% | 57.7% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 70.0% | 70.0% | 67.1% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.0% | 73.0% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 85.1% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.5% | 69.5% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.0% | 96.0% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 87.3% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 91.5% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 92.3% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 98.7% | 98.7% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 83.6% | 59.8% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* John L Nash Middle School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.