Jacob Coy Middle School
2680 Dayton Xenia Rd
Dayton OH, 45434, Greene County
Phone: 937-429-7577
Ranking: (316 out of 2,572, top 12%)*
Type: Regular Middle School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 6 to Grade 8
School District: Beavercreek City School District
Title I Eligible School: No
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 50 | 47 | 47 | 54 | 53 | 51 | 52 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,075 | 942 | 940 | 955 | 906 | 907 | 910 | |||||||
Grade 6: | 361 | 33.6% | 330 | 35.0% | 318 | 33.8% | 315 | 33.0% | 306 | 33.8% | 319 | 35.2% | 285 | 31.3% |
Grade 7: | 368 | 34.2% | 306 | 32.5% | 309 | 32.9% | 310 | 32.5% | 326 | 36.0% | 273 | 30.1% | 292 | 32.1% |
Grade 8: | 346 | 32.2% | 306 | 32.5% | 313 | 33.3% | 330 | 34.6% | 274 | 30.2% | 315 | 34.7% | 333 | 36.6% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 555 | 51.6% | 479 | 50.8% | 481 | 51.2% | 491 | 51.4% | 436 | 48.1% | 432 | 47.6% | 433 | 47.6% |
Female: | 520 | 48.4% | 463 | 49.2% | 459 | 48.8% | 464 | 48.6% | 423 | 46.7% | 432 | 47.6% | 436 | 47.9% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.2% | 4 | 0.4% |
Asian: | 83 | 7.7% | 71 | 7.5% | 80 | 8.5% | 76 | 8.0% | 73 | 8.1% | 64 | 7.1% | 49 | 5.4% |
Hispanic: | 24 | 2.2% | 22 | 2.3% | 29 | 3.1% | 37 | 3.9% | 27 | 3.0% | 29 | 3.2% | 21 | 2.3% |
Black: | 34 | 3.2% | 39 | 4.1% | 49 | 5.2% | 42 | 4.4% | 33 | 3.6% | 29 | 3.2% | 28 | 3.1% |
White: | 888 | 82.6% | 761 | 80.8% | 740 | 78.7% | 769 | 80.5% | 734 | 81.0% | 748 | 82.5% | 771 | 84.7% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 45 | 4.2% | 48 | 5.1% | 40 | 4.3% | 30 | 3.1% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 106 | 9.9% | 85 | 9.0% | 85 | 9.0% | 72 | 7.5% | 70 | 7.7% | 43 | 4.7% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 40 | 3.7% | 37 | 3.9% | 46 | 4.9% | 45 | 4.7% | 38 | 4.2% | 35 | 3.9% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 21.68 | 20.03 | 19.84 | 17.66 | 17.26 | 17.90 | 17.70 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OAA | ||||||
2004 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 85.2% | 65.6% |
2005 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 85% | 81.5% | 62.5% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 84.8% | 68.4% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.2% | 90.7% | 74% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 92.1% | 76.6% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 92% | 75.2% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 90.8% | 77.4% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 87.7% | 77.5% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 88.6% | 79.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 88.0% | 74.7% |
2004 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 82.7% | 83% | 64.6% |
2005 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.2% | 80.8% | 69.8% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 92.9% | 83.6% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 92.4% | 78% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 93.9% | 79.7% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 93.2% | 81.3% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.6% | 95% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 95% | 93.8% | 85.6% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.7% | 93.6% | 86.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 93.3% | 82.8% |
2005 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 83.7% | 58.5% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 81.9% | 63.2% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 86% | 71% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 87% | 68.8% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 88.5% | 74.3% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 88% | 87% | 71.1% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 87.4% | 74.8% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.0% | 85.0% | 73.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 86.1% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 90% | 91.7% | 78.9% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 93.1% | 77% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 92.4% | 77.3% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 92.1% | 76.6% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.7% | 94.1% | 80.2% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92.1% | 77.3% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 89.3% | 79.5% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 91.1% | 81% |
2007 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 93.1% | 81% |
2008 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.7% | 94.7% | 85.7% |
2009 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 93.2% | 80.5% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 75.1% | 77% | 60.1% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.6% | 87.3% | 68.6% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 89.4% | 71% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 88.1% | 72.8% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.1% | 86.8% | 70.6% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.5% | 85.1% | 69.2% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 89.6% | 74.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.4% | 90.8% | 79.6% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 88.0% | 76.6% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.7% | 89.2% | 78.9% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 92.2% | 77.1% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.2% | 92.3% | 80% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 89% | 91.3% | 79.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 89% | 88% | 72.4% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 93.1% | 80.9% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 95% | 85.1% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 93.0% | 83% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 93.9% | 85.7% |
2007 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 79% | 80.7% | 62% |
2008 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 77.4% | 79.9% | 62.2% |
2009 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.1% | 85.1% | 62.8% |
2010 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.8% | 84.2% | 64.8% |
2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 85.8% | 67.4% |
2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 87.9% | 71.5% |
2013 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 82.7% | 68.6% |
2007 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.9% | 67.3% | 49% |
2008 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 65.7% | 71.2% | 53.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 74.7% | 76.1% | 51.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Jacob Coy Middle School was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.