Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
STAAR | ||||||
2012 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 99% | 66% | N/A |
2013 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 97% | 61% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 100% | 63% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 100% | 58% | N/A |
2012 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 100% | 60% | N/A |
2013 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 97% | 60% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 100% | 68% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 100% | 67% | N/A |
2012 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 99% | 59% | N/A |
2013 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 99% | 57% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 71% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 77% | N/A |
2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 54% | N/A |
2013 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 66% | N/A |
2012 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 99% | 52% | N/A |
2013 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 99% | 59% | N/A |
STAAR EOC | ||||||
2012 | Algebra I | End of course | % met std | 100% | 75% | N/A |
2013 | Algebra I | End of course | % met std | 100% | 68% | N/A |
TAKS | ||||||
2011 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 100% | 74% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 100% | 76% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 100% | 70% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 100% | 77% | N/A |
2011 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 100% | 90% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 79% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 88% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 68% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 93% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Irma Rangel Young Womens Leadership Middle Middle School, Test Performance was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.