2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 81 | 77 | 78 | 76 | 77 | 79 | 79 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,132 | 1,127 | 1,133 | 1,097 | 1,098 | 1,038 | 1,038 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 304 | 26.9% | 292 | 25.9% | 301 | 26.6% | 277 | 25.3% | 308 | 28.1% | 286 | 27.6% | 259 | 25.0% |
Grade 10: | 284 | 25.1% | 289 | 25.6% | 271 | 23.9% | 285 | 26.0% | 288 | 26.2% | 253 | 24.4% | 250 | 24.1% |
Grade 11: | 288 | 25.4% | 262 | 23.2% | 285 | 25.2% | 287 | 26.2% | 250 | 22.8% | 245 | 23.6% | 258 | 24.9% |
Grade 12: | 249 | 22.0% | 278 | 24.7% | 271 | 23.9% | 245 | 22.3% | 250 | 22.8% | 254 | 24.5% | 271 | 26.1% |
Ungraded: | 7 | 0.6% | 6 | 0.5% | 5 | 0.4% | 3 | 0.3% | 2 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 576 | 50.9% | 578 | 51.3% | 575 | 50.8% | 567 | 51.7% | 558 | 50.8% | 520 | 50.1% | 478 | 46.1% |
Female: | 556 | 49.1% | 549 | 48.7% | 558 | 49.2% | 530 | 48.3% | 540 | 49.2% | 518 | 49.9% | 537 | 51.7% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 11 | 1.0% | 16 | 1.4% | 18 | 1.6% | 20 | 1.8% | 19 | 1.7% | 19 | 1.8% | 11 | 1.1% |
Hispanic: | 29 | 2.6% | 19 | 1.7% | 20 | 1.8% | 24 | 2.2% | 27 | 2.5% | 29 | 2.8% | 30 | 2.9% |
Black: | 15 | 1.3% | 19 | 1.7% | 14 | 1.2% | 19 | 1.7% | 22 | 2.0% | 19 | 1.8% | 18 | 1.7% |
White: | 1,045 | 92.3% | 1,047 | 92.9% | 1,052 | 92.9% | 994 | 90.6% | 997 | 90.8% | 941 | 90.7% | 960 | 92.5% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 32 | 2.8% | 26 | 2.3% | 29 | 2.6% | 40 | 3.6% | 33 | 3.0% | 30 | 2.9% | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 47 | 4.2% | 47 | 4.2% | 42 | 3.7% | 46 | 4.2% | 34 | 3.1% | 20 | 1.9% | 17 | 1.6% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 8 | 0.7% | 8 | 0.7% | 14 | 1.2% | 17 | 1.5% | 19 | 1.7% | 12 | 1.2% | 10 | 1.0% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 13.97 | 14.60 | 14.58 | 14.42 | 14.25 | 13.20 | 13.20 |
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
MCAS | ||||||
2003 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 92.3% | N/A | N/A |
2004 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 90% | 88% | N/A |
2005 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 88% | 88% | N/A |
2006 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 93% | 92% | N/A |
2007 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 91% | 90% | N/A |
2008 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 96% | 95% | N/A |
2009 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 97% | 96% | N/A |
2010 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 94% | 93% | N/A |
2011 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 96% | 96% | N/A |
2012 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 100% | 98% | N/A |
2013 | English Language Arts | 10th Grade | % proficient | 100% | 99% | N/A |
2003 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 79.5% | N/A | N/A |
2004 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 83% | 82% | N/A |
2005 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 87% | 86% | N/A |
2006 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 90% | 90% | N/A |
2007 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 89% | 88% | N/A |
2008 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 92% | 91% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 92% | 92% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 90% | 88% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 89% | 88% | N/A |
2012 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 96% | 95% | N/A |
2013 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % proficient | 96% | 94% | N/A |
2008 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 10th Grade | % proficient | 88% | 87% | N/A |
2009 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 10th Grade | % proficient | 92% | 92% | N/A |
2010 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 10th Grade | % proficient | 91% | 89% | N/A |
2011 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 10th Grade | % proficient | 89% | 89% | N/A |
2012 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 10th Grade | % proficient | 91% | 90% | N/A |
2013 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 10th Grade | % proficient | 94% | 92% | N/A |
2007 | Biology | End of course | % proficient | 73% | 72% | N/A |
2008 | Biology | End of course | % proficient | 88% | 88% | N/A |
2009 | Biology | End of course | % proficient | 92% | 92% | N/A |
2010 | Biology | End of course | % proficient | 90% | 88% | N/A |
2011 | Biology | End of course | % proficient | 91% | 90% | N/A |
2012 | Biology | End of course | % proficient | 93% | 92% | N/A |
2013 | Biology | End of course | % proficient | 92% | 93% | N/A |
2007 | Chemistry | End of course | % proficient | 60% | 60% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Hingham High High School was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.