USA.com / New York / Orange County / New Windsor, NY / Public Schools / Gams High Technology Magnet School
Gams High Technology Magnet School
300 Gidney Ave
Newburgh NY, 12550, Orange County
Phone: 845-563-8450
Ranking:
(2,711 out of 3,424, bottom 21%)*

Type: Regular Primary School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Kindergarten to Grade 6
School District: Newburgh City School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 51 | 48 | 56 | 68 | 63 | 65 | 61 | |||||||
Total Students: | 726 | 649 | 719 | 883 | 955 | 950 | 975 | |||||||
Kindergarten: | 102 | 14.0% | 101 | 15.6% | 107 | 14.9% | 91 | 10.3% | 151 | 15.8% | 134 | 14.1% | 147 | 15.1% |
Grade 1: | 98 | 13.5% | 99 | 15.3% | 96 | 13.4% | 145 | 16.4% | 133 | 13.9% | 144 | 15.2% | 147 | 15.1% |
Grade 2: | 98 | 13.5% | 86 | 13.3% | 137 | 19.1% | 137 | 15.5% | 142 | 14.9% | 141 | 14.8% | 140 | 14.4% |
Grade 3: | 92 | 12.7% | 120 | 18.5% | 129 | 17.9% | 139 | 15.7% | 131 | 13.7% | 135 | 14.2% | 142 | 14.6% |
Grade 4: | 114 | 15.7% | 120 | 18.5% | 135 | 18.8% | 124 | 14.0% | 138 | 14.5% | 132 | 13.9% | 132 | 13.5% |
Grade 5: | 117 | 16.1% | 123 | 19.0% | 115 | 16.0% | 127 | 14.4% | 126 | 13.2% | 138 | 14.5% | 141 | 14.5% |
Grade 6: | 105 | 14.5% | NA | NA | NA | NA | 120 | 13.6% | 133 | 13.9% | 126 | 13.3% | 126 | 12.9% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | 0.1% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 361 | 49.7% | 323 | 49.8% | 360 | 50.1% | 433 | 49.0% | 470 | 49.2% | 463 | 48.7% | 482 | 49.4% |
Female: | 365 | 50.3% | 326 | 50.2% | 359 | 49.9% | 450 | 51.0% | 477 | 49.9% | 479 | 50.4% | 489 | 50.2% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.1% |
Asian: | 14 | 1.9% | 14 | 2.2% | 15 | 2.1% | 22 | 2.5% | 23 | 2.4% | 24 | 2.5% | 19 | 1.9% |
Hispanic: | 400 | 55.1% | 350 | 53.9% | 371 | 51.6% | 405 | 45.9% | 419 | 43.9% | 380 | 40.0% | 403 | 41.3% |
Black: | 211 | 29.1% | 182 | 28.0% | 210 | 29.2% | 288 | 32.6% | 321 | 33.6% | 326 | 34.3% | 309 | 31.7% |
White: | 87 | 12.0% | 91 | 14.0% | 116 | 16.1% | 166 | 18.8% | 190 | 19.9% | 217 | 22.8% | 243 | 24.9% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 13 | 1.8% | 10 | 1.5% | 6 | 0.8% | 1 | 0.1% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 549 | 75.6% | 471 | 72.6% | 518 | 72.0% | 594 | 67.3% | 587 | 61.5% | 551 | 58.0% | 540 | 55.4% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 65 | 9.0% | 73 | 11.2% | 63 | 8.8% | 89 | 10.1% | 123 | 12.9% | 122 | 12.8% | 117 | 12.0% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 14.14 | 13.43 | 12.88 | 12.97 | 15.20 | 14.50 | 15.90 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
NY State Assessments | ||||||
2006 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % met std | 59% | 58% | 69% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % met std | 53% | 55% | 67% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % met std | 50% | 58% | 70% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % met std | 49% | 61% | 76% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % met std | 37% | 40% | 55% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % met std | 38% | 38% | 56% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % met std | 35% | 39% | 56% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % met std | 16.7% | 18.4% | 31.1% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75% | 74% | 80% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 77% | 74% | 85% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81% | 83% | 90% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | 93% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 33% | 40% | 59% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 38% | 40% | 59% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 44% | 45% | 61% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 11.6% | 17.1% | 34.2% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 55% | 54% | 69% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 64% | 59% | 68% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 64% | 61% | 71% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 59% | 66% | 77% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 30% | 35% | 57% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 37% | 37% | 56% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 47% | 42% | 60% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 16.7% | 20.6% | 30.3% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 78% | 68% | 78% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 77% | 69% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 72% | 83% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 79% | 77% | 87% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 40% | 40% | 64% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 42% | 46% | 67% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 63% | 49% | 69% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 15.1% | 20.3% | 36.3% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 91% | 84% | 86% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 84% | 80% | 85% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 81% | 75% | 86% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 84% | 78% | 88% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 86% | 79% | 89% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 83% | 80% | 88% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 93% | 83% | 89% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % met std | 67% | 60% | 67% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % met std | 58% | 57% | 68% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % met std | 71% | 70% | 78% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % met std | 72% | 75% | 83% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % met std | 27% | 38% | 53% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % met std | 31% | 37% | 53% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % met std | 49% | 45% | 58% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % met std | 16.5% | 17.8% | 30.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 72% | 62% | 68% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 60% | 65% | 76% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 81% | 75% | 83% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 83% | 81% | 88% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 33% | 49% | 65% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 39% | 50% | 66% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 62% | 53% | 66% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 21.5% | 15.7% | 29.9% |
2006 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 86% | 83% | 82% |
2007 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 78% | 75% | 78% |
2008 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 84% | 83% | 85% |
2009 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 87% | 80% | 86% |
2010 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 85% | 83% | 86% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % met std | 59% | 53% | 61% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % met std | 62% | 56% | 63% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % met std | 56% | 58% | 67% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % met std | 81% | 74% | 81% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % met std | 39% | 37% | 54% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % met std | 36% | 42% | 56% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 75% | 53% | 60% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 87% | 64% | 71% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 79% | 72% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 87% | 74% | 83% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 49% | 47% | 61% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 49% | 50% | 63% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Gams High Technology Magnet School was rated 2 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.