Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
ISAT | ||||||
2008 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 76.3% | 76.3% | N/A |
2009 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 86.2% | N/A |
2010 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 85.2% | N/A |
2011 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 83.3% | N/A |
2012 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 87.2% | N/A |
2013 | Language Usage | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82.3% | 82.3% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 91.6% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 95.4% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 94.6% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 91.6% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.2% | 93.2% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 93.8% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 79.7% | 79.7% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 91.6% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 95.4% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 89.4% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 91.5% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 92.5% | N/A |
2011 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 88.8% | N/A |
2012 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 87.6% | N/A |
2013 | Language Usage | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.7% | 88.7% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.9% | 90% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 90.5% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 90.4% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.7% | 90.7% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 90.4% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Fruitland Elementary School, Test Performance was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.