USA.com / New Hampshire / Grafton County / Enfield Center, NH / Public Schools / Frances C. Richmond School
Frances C. Richmond School
63 Lyme Rd
Hanover NH, 03755, Grafton County
Phone: 603-643-6040
Ranking:
(4 out of 355, top 1%)*

Type: Regular Middle School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 6 to Grade 8
School District: Dresden School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 36 | 37 | 35 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 39 | |||||||
Total Students: | 391 | 398 | 400 | 427 | 422 | 433 | 396 | |||||||
Grade 6: | 101 | 25.8% | 86 | 21.6% | 94 | 23.5% | 106 | 24.8% | 84 | 19.9% | 117 | 27.0% | 88 | 22.2% |
Grade 7: | 145 | 37.1% | 146 | 36.7% | 168 | 42.0% | 140 | 32.8% | 185 | 43.8% | 156 | 36.0% | 153 | 38.6% |
Grade 8: | 145 | 37.1% | 166 | 41.7% | 138 | 34.5% | 181 | 42.4% | 153 | 36.3% | 160 | 37.0% | 155 | 39.1% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 199 | 50.9% | 211 | 53.0% | 220 | 55.0% | 219 | 51.3% | 204 | 48.3% | 226 | 52.2% | 205 | 51.8% |
Female: | 192 | 49.1% | 187 | 47.0% | 180 | 45.0% | 208 | 48.7% | 218 | 51.7% | 199 | 46.0% | 187 | 47.2% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.5% | 1 | 0.3% |
Asian: | 33 | 8.4% | 30 | 7.5% | 37 | 9.3% | 42 | 9.8% | 42 | 10.0% | 36 | 8.3% | 25 | 6.3% |
Hispanic: | 10 | 2.6% | 9 | 2.3% | 12 | 3.0% | 4 | 0.9% | 5 | 1.2% | 2 | 0.5% | 3 | 0.8% |
Black: | 7 | 1.8% | 3 | 0.8% | 5 | 1.3% | 5 | 1.2% | 10 | 2.4% | 11 | 2.5% | 9 | 2.3% |
White: | 339 | 86.7% | 355 | 89.2% | 344 | 86.0% | 373 | 87.4% | 364 | 86.3% | 382 | 88.2% | 358 | 90.4% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 2 | 0.5% | 1 | 0.3% | 2 | 0.5% | 2 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 13 | 3.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 11.01 | 10.73 | 11.59 | 11.12 | 11.19 | 11.50 | 10.30 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
NECAP | ||||||
2006 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 61% |
2007 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 67% |
2008 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 68% |
2009 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | 69% |
2010 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 90% | 90% | 72% |
2011 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | 71% |
2012 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 90% | 90% | 72% |
2013 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 93% | 93% | 74% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 90% | 90% | 65% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 94% | 94% | 72% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93% | 93% | 73% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | 74% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | 76% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93% | 93% | 77% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 95% | 95% | 80% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 96% | 96% | 79% |
2006 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | 59% |
2007 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 62% |
2008 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | 63% |
2009 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | 66% |
2010 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | 66% |
2011 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | 66% |
2012 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | 68% |
2013 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 69% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | 66% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 93% | 93% | 67% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 95% | 95% | 75% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | 77% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | 77% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | 72% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 94% | 94% | 77% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 93% | 93% | 77% |
2006 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | 56% |
2007 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 57% |
2008 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 88% | 87% | 58% |
2009 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 90% | 90% | 65% |
2010 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 66% |
2011 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 66% |
2012 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | 68% |
2013 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 68% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | 62% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 93% | 93% | 66% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 95% | 95% | 67% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 95% | 95% | 71% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | 76% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 97% | 97% | 78% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 98% | 98% | 82% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 98% | 98% | 82% |
2006 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | 49% |
2007 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | 42% |
2008 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 43% |
2009 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | 51% |
2011 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 64% |
2012 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | 61% |
2013 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | 67% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Frances C. Richmond School was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.