USA.com / Pennsylvania / Wayne County / Public Schools / Forest City Regional Elementary School / Test Performance

Forest City Regional Elementary School, Test Performance

Basic InfoStudents and TeachersTest PerformanceSchool District

Year	Test	Grade	Measurement	Score	School District	State Average
PSSA
2005	Math	3rd Grade	% met std	95%	95%	81%
2006	Math	3rd Grade	% met std	92%	92%	83%
2007	Math	3rd Grade	% met std	75%	75%	78.5%
2008	Math	3rd Grade	% met std	77.6%	77.6%	80.5%
2009	Math	3rd Grade	% met std	94.6%	94.6%	81.7%
2010	Math	3rd Grade	% met std	98.5%	98.5%	84.5%
2011	Math	3rd Grade	% met std	97.4%	97.5%	83.5%
2012	Math	3rd Grade	% met std	85.7%	85.7%	80%
2005	Reading	3rd Grade	% met std	78%	78%	68%
2006	Reading	3rd Grade	% met std	81%	81%	69%
2007	Reading	3rd Grade	% met std	71.1%	71.1%	72.8%
2008	Reading	3rd Grade	% met std	75.9%	75.9%	76.8%
2009	Reading	3rd Grade	% met std	83.6%	83.9%	77%
2010	Reading	3rd Grade	% met std	95.5%	95.5%	75.2%
2011	Reading	3rd Grade	% met std	92.3%	92.5%	77.2%
2012	Reading	3rd Grade	% met std	75.5%	75.5%	74.1%
2006	Math	4th Grade	% met std	79.8%	79.8%	77.2%
2007	Math	4th Grade	% met std	82.4%	82.4%	78%
2008	Math	4th Grade	% met std	71.7%	71.7%	79.6%
2009	Math	4th Grade	% met std	74.6%	74.6%	81.8%
2010	Math	4th Grade	% met std	92.9%	92.9%	84.9%
2011	Math	4th Grade	% met std	92.2%	92.4%	85.2%
2012	Math	4th Grade	% met std	97.6%	97.7%	82.6%
2006	Reading	4th Grade	% met std	70.2%	70.2%	68.1%
2007	Reading	4th Grade	% met std	70.3%	70.3%	70.1%
2008	Reading	4th Grade	% met std	66.1%	66.1%	70.1%
2009	Reading	4th Grade	% met std	70.9%	70.9%	72.6%
2010	Reading	4th Grade	% met std	73.7%	73.7%	72.9%
2011	Reading	4th Grade	% met std	86.2%	86.4%	73.3%
2012	Reading	4th Grade	% met std	80.5%	79%	72.1%
2008	Science	4th Grade	% met std	79.2%	79.2%	81.5%
2009	Science	4th Grade	% met std	94.6%	94.6%	83.4%
2010	Science	4th Grade	% met std	91.3%	91.3%	81.4%
2011	Science	4th Grade	% met std	95.5%	95.6%	82.9%
2012	Science	4th Grade	% met std	90.3%	90.7%	82.3%
2003	Math	5th Grade	% met std	29.3%	29.3%	56.3%
2004	Math	5th Grade	% met std	77.3%	76.2%	61.8%
2005	Math	5th Grade	% met std	71.7%	70.5%	69%
2006	Math	5th Grade	% met std	41.9%	41.9%	66.9%
2007	Math	5th Grade	% met std	59%	59%	71%
2008	Math	5th Grade	% met std	66.7%	66.7%	73.2%
2009	Math	5th Grade	% met std	59.3%	59.3%	73.5%
2010	Math	5th Grade	% met std	88.7%	88.7%	74.4%
2011	Math	5th Grade	% met std	77.8%	76.3%	76.3%
2012	Math	5th Grade	% met std	78.5%	78.8%	73.3%
2003	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	47.4%	47.4%	58%
2004	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	69.7%	68.7%	62.7%
2005	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	68.4%	68.9%	64.2%
2006	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	53.2%	53.2%	60.6%
2007	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	62.1%	62.1%	60%
2008	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	68.1%	68.1%	61.6%
2009	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	64.4%	64.4%	64.5%
2010	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	71.4%	71.4%	64.1%
2011	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	75%	73.5%	67.3%
2012	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	76.8%	75.7%	65%
2006	Writing	5th Grade	% met std	37.5%	37.5%	54.1%
2007	Writing	5th Grade	% met std	79.1%	79.1%	57.3%
2008	Writing	5th Grade	% met std	70%	70%	57.3%
2009	Writing	5th Grade	% met std	65%	65%	58.1%
2010	Writing	5th Grade	% met std	76.8%	76.8%	61.8%
2011	Writing	5th Grade	% met std	83.3%	81.8%	67.1%
2012	Writing	5th Grade	% met std	81.7%	80.6%	64.2%
2006	Math	6th Grade	% met std	75%	75%	68%
2007	Math	6th Grade	% met std	66.1%	66.1%	69.6%
2008	Math	6th Grade	% met std	52.2%	52.2%	72.3%
2009	Math	6th Grade	% met std	65.7%	65.7%	75.7%
2010	Math	6th Grade	% met std	82.3%	82.3%	78%
2011	Math	6th Grade	% met std	82.5%	82.7%	78.8%
2012	Math	6th Grade	% met std	91.7%	89.8%	77.2%
2006	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	76.6%	76.6%	65.9%
2007	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	55.4%	55.4%	63.5%
2008	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	60.8%	60.8%	66.9%
2009	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	85%	85%	67.6%
2010	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	78.9%	78.9%	68.8%
2011	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	82.5%	82.7%	69.9%
2012	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	66.7%	65.3%	68.5%

Some data by SchoolDigger.com.

* Forest City Regional Elementary School, Test Performance was rated 3 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.