2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 122 | 122 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 130 | 135 | |||||||
Total Students: | 2,028 | 2,008 | 2,062 | 2,062 | 2,116 | 2,210 | 2,323 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 530 | 26.1% | 490 | 24.4% | 500 | 24.2% | 489 | 23.7% | 512 | 24.2% | 512 | 23.2% | 495 | 21.3% |
Grade 10: | 494 | 24.4% | 508 | 25.3% | 481 | 23.3% | 515 | 25.0% | 522 | 24.7% | 492 | 22.3% | 554 | 23.8% |
Grade 11: | 503 | 24.8% | 482 | 24.0% | 520 | 25.2% | 525 | 25.5% | 492 | 23.3% | 532 | 24.1% | 610 | 26.3% |
Grade 12: | 501 | 24.7% | 528 | 26.3% | 561 | 27.2% | 533 | 25.8% | 590 | 27.9% | 674 | 30.5% | 664 | 28.6% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 1,042 | 51.4% | 1,039 | 51.7% | 1,064 | 51.6% | 1,096 | 53.2% | 1,111 | 52.5% | 1,144 | 51.8% | 1,172 | 50.5% |
Female: | 986 | 48.6% | 969 | 48.3% | 998 | 48.4% | 966 | 46.8% | 997 | 47.1% | 1,058 | 47.9% | 1,147 | 49.4% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 5 | 0.2% | 6 | 0.3% | 15 | 0.7% | 15 | 0.7% | 11 | 0.5% | 7 | 0.3% | 9 | 0.4% |
Asian: | 65 | 3.2% | 60 | 3.0% | 62 | 3.0% | 64 | 3.1% | 61 | 2.9% | 63 | 2.9% | 79 | 3.4% |
Hispanic: | 171 | 8.4% | 164 | 8.2% | 155 | 7.5% | 148 | 7.2% | 128 | 6.0% | 123 | 5.6% | 113 | 4.9% |
Black: | 75 | 3.7% | 60 | 3.0% | 61 | 3.0% | 69 | 3.3% | 70 | 3.3% | 55 | 2.5% | 60 | 2.6% |
White: | 1,668 | 82.2% | 1,681 | 83.7% | 1,730 | 83.9% | 1,732 | 84.0% | 1,846 | 87.2% | 1,962 | 88.8% | 2,062 | 88.8% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.1% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 44 | 2.2% | 37 | 1.8% | 38 | 1.8% | 32 | 1.6% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 658 | 32.4% | 628 | 31.3% | 588 | 28.5% | 571 | 27.7% | 504 | 23.8% | 440 | 19.9% | 450 | 19.4% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 120 | 5.9% | 118 | 5.9% | 137 | 6.6% | 150 | 7.3% | 151 | 7.1% | 181 | 8.2% | 171 | 7.4% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 16.56 | 16.40 | 17.21 | 17.02 | 17.28 | 17.10 | 17.30 |
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
WKCE | ||||||
2004 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 70% | 70% | N/A |
2005 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 69% | 68% | N/A |
2006 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2007 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2008 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 64% | 64% | N/A |
2009 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2010 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 65% | 65% | N/A |
2011 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2012 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 66% | 66% | N/A |
2013 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 73% | 73% | N/A |
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 67% | 67% | N/A |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 71% | 71% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 71% | 71% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 69% | 69% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 61% | 61% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 66% | 66% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 65% | 65% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 39% | 39% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 73% | 72% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 67% | 67% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 74% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 73% | 73% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 68% | 68% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 39% | 39% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 74% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 71% | 71% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 74% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 73% | 73% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 64% | 64% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 70% | 70% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 61% | 61% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 74% | N/A |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 68% | 68% | N/A |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2004 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 72% | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 74% | N/A |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 73% | 73% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 70% | 70% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | N/A |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Fond Du Lac High School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.