Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OAA | ||||||
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 82.8% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 79.1% | 79.1% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 83.6% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 76.5% | 76.5% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.5% | 78.5% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.5% | 84.5% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 87.2% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 87.9% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 88.8% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 88.6% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 92.8% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.9% | 89.9% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 83.8% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.7% | 87.7% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 91.3% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 90.1% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 83.6% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 82.1% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.1% | 84.1% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.6% | 85.6% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 90.1% | N/A |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 90.1% | N/A |
2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 86.7% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.2% | 75.2% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 87.1% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.4% | 77.4% | N/A |
2004 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 90.2% | N/A |
2005 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | N/A |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 84.2% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.9% | 89.9% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 92.3% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.9% | 93.9% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.6% | 93.6% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 94.4% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 92.4% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 93.5% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 90.2% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.8% | 91.8% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 93.5% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.7% | 93.7% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.8% | 91.8% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 94.2% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 96.9% | 96.9% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 96.8% | 96.8% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 95.2% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Fallen Timbers Middle School, Test Performance was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.