Ephraim Curtis Middle Middle School
22 Pratts Mill Rd
Sudbury MA, 01776, Middlesex County
Phone: 978-443-1071
Ranking:
(27 out of 1,316, top 2%)*

Type: Regular Middle School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 6 to Grade 8
School District: Sudbury School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 79 | 80 | 76 | 81 | 76 | 75 | 77 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,022 | 1,065 | 1,076 | 1,064 | 1,042 | 1,046 | 1,075 | |||||||
Grade 6: | 331 | 32.4% | 357 | 33.5% | 329 | 30.6% | 393 | 36.9% | 353 | 33.9% | 327 | 31.3% | 373 | 34.7% |
Grade 7: | 359 | 35.1% | 324 | 30.4% | 394 | 36.6% | 353 | 33.2% | 320 | 30.7% | 369 | 35.3% | 342 | 31.8% |
Grade 8: | 332 | 32.5% | 384 | 36.1% | 353 | 32.8% | 318 | 29.9% | 369 | 35.4% | 350 | 33.5% | 360 | 33.5% |
Ungraded: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 549 | 53.7% | 523 | 49.1% | 520 | 48.3% | 514 | 48.3% | 519 | 49.8% | 510 | 48.8% | 509 | 47.3% |
Female: | 473 | 46.3% | 542 | 50.9% | 556 | 51.7% | 550 | 51.7% | 523 | 50.2% | 536 | 51.2% | 526 | 48.9% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 55 | 5.4% | 59 | 5.5% | 61 | 5.7% | 59 | 5.5% | 49 | 4.7% | 59 | 5.6% | 49 | 4.6% |
Hispanic: | 25 | 2.4% | 29 | 2.7% | 24 | 2.2% | 17 | 1.6% | 26 | 2.5% | 25 | 2.4% | 27 | 2.5% |
Black: | 27 | 2.6% | 26 | 2.4% | 29 | 2.7% | 25 | 2.3% | 27 | 2.6% | 25 | 2.4% | 25 | 2.3% |
White: | 859 | 84.1% | 904 | 84.9% | 925 | 86.0% | 924 | 86.8% | 905 | 86.9% | 901 | 86.1% | 938 | 87.3% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 53 | 5.2% | 45 | 4.2% | 35 | 3.3% | 38 | 3.6% | 34 | 3.3% | 36 | 3.4% | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 44 | 4.3% | 35 | 3.3% | 31 | 2.9% | 34 | 3.2% | 35 | 3.4% | 32 | 3.1% | 25 | 2.3% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 8 | 0.8% | 2 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.3% | 3 | 0.3% | 7 | 0.7% | 8 | 0.8% | 7 | 0.7% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 12.96 | 13.31 | 14.21 | 13.14 | 13.76 | 13.90 | 14.00 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
MCAS | ||||||
2006 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 94% | 93% | 64% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 91% | 90% | 67% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 91% | 90% | 67% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 92% | 90% | 66% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 93% | 90% | 69% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 92% | 91% | 68% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 90% | 90% | 66% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 89% | 87% | 67% |
2003 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 69.9% | 68.4% | 42% |
2004 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 70% | 68% | 42% |
2005 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 73% | 73% | 46% |
2006 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 78% | 77% | 46% |
2007 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 81% | 81% | 52% |
2008 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 88% | 88% | 56% |
2009 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 87% | 86% | 57% |
2010 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 87% | 84% | 59% |
2011 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 88% | 86% | 58% |
2012 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 84% | 83% | 60% |
2013 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 78% | 77% | 60% |
2003 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 92.1% | 91.4% | 66% |
2004 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 95% | 94% | 68% |
2005 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 91% | 91% | 66% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 87% | 86% | 65% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 95% | 95% | 69% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 92% | 91% | 69% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 93% | 94% | 70% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 93% | 92% | 72% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 93% | 90% | 73% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 93% | 93% | 71% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 92% | 91% | 71% |
2006 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 75% | 73% | 40% |
2007 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 79% | 79% | 46% |
2008 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 79% | 78% | 47% |
2009 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 86% | 85% | 49% |
2010 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 87% | 85% | 53% |
2011 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 82% | 80% | 51% |
2012 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 83% | 82% | 51% |
2013 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 83% | 80% | 52% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 96% | 95% | 74% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 94% | 94% | 75% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 95% | 95% | 75% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 95% | 95% | 78% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 95% | 96% | 78% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 96% | 95% | 79% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 95% | 94% | 81% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 96% | 95% | 78% |
2003 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 66.5% | 65.8% | 37% |
2004 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 70% | 69% | 39% |
2005 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 77% | 76% | 39% |
2006 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 73% | 73% | 40% |
2007 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 78% | 78% | 45% |
2008 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 82% | 82% | 49% |
2009 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 76% | 75% | 48% |
2010 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 85% | 84% | 51% |
2011 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 85% | 84% | 52% |
2012 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 83% | 80% | 52% |
2013 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 83% | 82% | 54% |
2003 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 66.1% | 65.3% | 32% |
2004 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 64% | 64% | 33% |
2005 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 67% | 66% | 33% |
2006 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 67% | 65% | 32% |
2007 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 66% | 66% | 33% |
2008 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 66% | 66% | 39% |
2009 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 68% | 67% | 39% |
2010 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 69% | 68% | 40% |
2011 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 72% | 70% | 39% |
2012 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 72% | 70% | 43% |
2013 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 75% | 75% | 39% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Ephraim Curtis Middle Middle School was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.