2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | NA | NA | 73 | 76 | 78 | 79 | 89 | 88 | ||||||
Total Students: | 1,635 | 1,646 | 1,611 | 1,720 | 1,780 | 1,785 | 1,843 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 419 | 25.6% | 411 | 25.0% | 420 | 26.1% | 413 | 24.0% | 451 | 25.3% | 396 | 22.2% | 509 | 27.6% |
Grade 10: | 404 | 24.7% | 431 | 26.2% | 399 | 24.8% | 439 | 25.5% | 388 | 21.8% | 516 | 28.9% | 489 | 26.5% |
Grade 11: | 446 | 27.3% | 397 | 24.1% | 438 | 27.2% | 436 | 25.3% | 533 | 29.9% | 492 | 27.6% | 479 | 26.0% |
Grade 12: | 366 | 22.4% | 407 | 24.7% | 354 | 22.0% | 432 | 25.1% | 408 | 22.9% | 381 | 21.3% | 365 | 19.8% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 811 | 49.6% | 816 | 49.6% | 805 | 50.0% | 847 | 49.2% | 867 | 48.7% | 882 | 49.4% | 940 | 51.0% |
Female: | 824 | 50.4% | 830 | 50.4% | 806 | 50.0% | 873 | 50.8% | 875 | 49.2% | 872 | 48.9% | 895 | 48.6% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 12 | 0.7% | 13 | 0.8% | 11 | 0.7% | 23 | 1.3% | 27 | 1.5% | 27 | 1.5% | 29 | 1.6% |
Asian: | 254 | 15.5% | 253 | 15.4% | 243 | 15.1% | 271 | 15.8% | 297 | 16.7% | 291 | 16.3% | 287 | 15.6% |
Hispanic: | 227 | 13.9% | 198 | 12.0% | 181 | 11.2% | 165 | 9.6% | 139 | 7.8% | 147 | 8.2% | 124 | 6.7% |
Black: | 113 | 6.9% | 109 | 6.6% | 105 | 6.5% | 112 | 6.5% | 119 | 6.7% | 98 | 5.5% | 102 | 5.5% |
White: | 892 | 54.6% | 947 | 57.5% | 963 | 59.8% | 1,092 | 63.5% | 1,168 | 65.6% | 1,199 | 67.2% | 1,297 | 70.4% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 6 | 0.4% | 7 | 0.4% | 5 | 0.3% | 5 | 0.3% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 131 | 8.0% | 119 | 7.2% | 103 | 6.4% | 52 | 3.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 408 | 25.0% | 373 | 22.7% | 346 | 21.5% | 195 | 11.3% | 244 | 13.7% | 245 | 13.7% | 244 | 13.2% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 134 | 8.2% | 103 | 6.3% | 111 | 6.9% | 88 | 5.1% | 66 | 3.7% | 106 | 5.9% | 98 | 5.3% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | NA | NA | 22.60 | 21.21 | 21.98 | 22.62 | 20.10 | 20.90 |
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
EOC | ||||||
2012 | Biology | End of course | % met std | 75.7% | 68.6% | N/A |
2013 | Biology | End of course | % met std | 89.6% | 85.0% | N/A |
2011 | Math Year 1 | End of course | % met std | 71.5% | 70.4% | N/A |
2012 | Math Year 1 | End of course | % met std | 77.3% | 73.8% | N/A |
2013 | Math Year 1 | End of course | % met std | 86.3% | 81.8% | N/A |
2011 | Math Year 2 | End of course | % met std | 70.9% | 69.7% | N/A |
2012 | Math Year 2 | End of course | % met std | 86.6% | 82.1% | N/A |
2013 | Math Year 2 | End of course | % met std | 93.3% | 90.0% | N/A |
HSPE | ||||||
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 47.9% | 42.2% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 83.9% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.9% | 84.9% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 85.4% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 86.4% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 53.1% | 50.5% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 63.1% | 55.1% | N/A |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 90.8% | N/A |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 90.7% | N/A |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.3% | 90.7% | N/A |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 88.6% | N/A |
WASL | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 54% | 47.6% | N/A |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.2% | 49.9% | N/A |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.4% | 55.8% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 63.9% | 53.5% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 57.7% | 53.5% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.1% | 54% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.1% | 68.4% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 74.3% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 87.3% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 83.9% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 86.3% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 86.9% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 41.3% | 29.7% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 52.8% | 35.1% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 54.6% | 38.2% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 50.4% | 38.8% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 49.9% | 40.9% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 56% | 45.3% | N/A |
2004 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.7% | 72.2% | N/A |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 68% | N/A |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 93% | 85.4% | N/A |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 88% | N/A |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 92.4% | N/A |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 89.6% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Edmonds Woodway High School was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.