2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 120 | 123 | 130 | 133 | 126 | 123 | 104 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,884 | 1,914 | 1,840 | 1,860 | 1,842 | 1,794 | 1,793 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 462 | 24.5% | 519 | 27.1% | 466 | 25.3% | 464 | 24.9% | 491 | 26.7% | 456 | 25.4% | 488 | 27.2% |
Grade 10: | 508 | 27.0% | 476 | 24.9% | 469 | 25.5% | 483 | 26.0% | 462 | 25.1% | 478 | 26.6% | 445 | 24.8% |
Grade 11: | 460 | 24.4% | 458 | 23.9% | 468 | 25.4% | 435 | 23.4% | 459 | 24.9% | 417 | 23.2% | 429 | 23.9% |
Grade 12: | 454 | 24.1% | 461 | 24.1% | 437 | 23.8% | 478 | 25.7% | 430 | 23.3% | 443 | 24.7% | 431 | 24.0% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 971 | 51.5% | 977 | 51.0% | 980 | 53.3% | 965 | 51.9% | 911 | 49.5% | 913 | 50.9% | 894 | 49.9% |
Female: | 913 | 48.5% | 937 | 49.0% | 860 | 46.7% | 895 | 48.1% | 861 | 46.7% | 814 | 45.4% | 842 | 47.0% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 2 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 4 | 0.2% | 4 | 0.2% |
Asian: | 231 | 12.3% | 240 | 12.5% | 238 | 12.9% | 237 | 12.7% | 232 | 12.6% | 219 | 12.2% | 196 | 10.9% |
Hispanic: | 48 | 2.5% | 46 | 2.4% | 40 | 2.2% | 34 | 1.8% | 38 | 2.1% | 33 | 1.8% | 30 | 1.7% |
Black: | 92 | 4.9% | 80 | 4.2% | 86 | 4.7% | 72 | 3.9% | 62 | 3.4% | 53 | 3.0% | 54 | 3.0% |
White: | 1,428 | 75.8% | 1,471 | 76.9% | 1,407 | 76.5% | 1,456 | 78.3% | 1,448 | 78.6% | 1,426 | 79.5% | 1,456 | 81.2% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 83 | 4.4% | 75 | 3.9% | 67 | 3.6% | 61 | 3.3% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 164 | 8.7% | 173 | 9.0% | 165 | 9.0% | 160 | 8.6% | 131 | 7.1% | 95 | 5.3% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 35 | 1.9% | 27 | 1.4% | 38 | 2.1% | 35 | 1.9% | 28 | 1.5% | 32 | 1.8% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 15.69 | 15.51 | 14.20 | 14.03 | 14.62 | 14.60 | 17.30 |
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 90.5% | N/A |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 94.6% | N/A |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.3% | 96.5% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 95% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 94.8% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 94.6% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 94.9% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 94.4% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 94.2% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 94.9% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 94.8% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.4% | 98.5% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.3% | 98% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.6% | 96.3% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 95.8% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 96% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.9% | 95.6% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.2% | 96.9% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 95.1% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.6% | 96.6% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 93.9% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 93.1% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 92.5% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 93.6% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 91.8% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 92.2% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 93% | 92.6% | N/A |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 92.5% | N/A |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.3% | 93.2% | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 95.5% | N/A |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.5% | 96.6% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 95.4% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 94.7% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 95.2% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 95.3% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 94.5% | N/A |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.3% | 94.1% | N/A |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 95.0% | N/A |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 95.9% | N/A |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.8% | 96.9% | N/A |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 98.6% | 98.3% | N/A |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 95.1% | N/A |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.2% | 97.4% | N/A |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.8% | 92.9% | N/A |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 96.4% | N/A |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 95.5% | N/A |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 95.1% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.8% | 98.3% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 97.3% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.3% | 97.9% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.5% | 98.2% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.1% | 97.8% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.5% | 98.3% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.1% | 98.3% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.3% | 99.1% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.3% | 98.4% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 98% | 98.1% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 98% | 98% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.8% | 98.5% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.1% | 98.7% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.1% | 99.2% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.5% | 97.6% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 97.3% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 97.3% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 98% | 97% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.9% | 96.7% | N/A |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 97.4% | N/A |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.6% | 97.3% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.5% | 98.3% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.3% | 98.2% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 99% | 98.1% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98% | 97.7% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.4% | 97.9% | N/A |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.7% | 98.3% | N/A |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.9% | 98.6% | N/A |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.3% | 99.6% | N/A |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.8% | 99% | N/A |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.3% | 98.3% | N/A |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.7% | 98.7% | N/A |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.1% | 98.6% | N/A |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 99.1% | 99.1% | N/A |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.9% | 99.0% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Dublin Coffman High School was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.