Dr Edward G Dyer School
201 South Kendrick Ave
Burlington WI, 53105, Racine County
Phone: 262-763-0220
Ranking: (526 out of 1,503, top 35%)*
Type: Regular Middle School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 4 to Grade 6
School District: Burlington Area School District
Title I Eligible School: No
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 28 | 26 | 29 | 33 | 35 | 33 | 32 | |||||||
Total Students: | 445 | 429 | 454 | 517 | 527 | 511 | 503 | |||||||
Grade 4: | 19 | 4.3% | 15 | 3.5% | 20 | 4.4% | 20 | 3.9% | 19 | 3.6% | 21 | 4.1% | 14 | 2.8% |
Grade 5: | 216 | 48.5% | 205 | 47.8% | 211 | 46.5% | 229 | 44.3% | 259 | 49.1% | 237 | 46.4% | 236 | 46.9% |
Grade 6: | 210 | 47.2% | 209 | 48.7% | 223 | 49.1% | 268 | 51.8% | 249 | 47.2% | 253 | 49.5% | 253 | 50.3% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 228 | 51.2% | 228 | 53.1% | 235 | 51.8% | 265 | 51.3% | 270 | 51.2% | 269 | 52.6% | 263 | 52.3% |
Female: | 217 | 48.8% | 201 | 46.9% | 219 | 48.2% | 252 | 48.7% | 249 | 47.2% | 234 | 45.8% | 236 | 46.9% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 4 | 0.8% | 3 | 0.6% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% |
Asian: | 10 | 2.2% | 6 | 1.4% | 5 | 1.1% | 4 | 0.8% | 4 | 0.8% | 7 | 1.4% | 5 | 1.0% |
Hispanic: | 56 | 12.6% | 48 | 11.2% | 43 | 9.5% | 57 | 11.0% | 46 | 8.7% | 34 | 6.7% | 36 | 7.2% |
Black: | 5 | 1.1% | 12 | 2.8% | 9 | 2.0% | 11 | 2.1% | 15 | 2.8% | 8 | 1.6% | 9 | 1.8% |
White: | 372 | 83.6% | 359 | 83.7% | 394 | 86.8% | 437 | 84.5% | 459 | 87.1% | 461 | 90.2% | 452 | 89.9% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 2 | 0.4% | 4 | 0.9% | 2 | 0.4% | 4 | 0.8% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 155 | 34.8% | 134 | 31.2% | 172 | 37.9% | 185 | 35.8% | 143 | 27.1% | 130 | 25.4% | 68 | 13.5% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 28 | 6.3% | 25 | 5.8% | 26 | 5.7% | 35 | 6.8% | 39 | 7.4% | 1 | 0.2% | 33 | 6.6% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 15.84 | 16.80 | 15.40 | 15.47 | 15.12 | 15.30 | 15.70 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
WKCE | ||||||
2004 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 84% | 78% |
2007 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 86% | 76% |
2008 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 86% | 82% | 77% |
2009 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 77% | 78% |
2010 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 89% | 78% | 78% |
2011 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 81% | 77% |
2012 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 94% | 78% | 78% |
2013 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 81% | 77% |
2004 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 84% | 79% | 73% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 86% | 77% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 93% | 87% | 78% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 82% | 82% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 83% | 87% | 81% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 82% | 81% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 81% | 81% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 67% | 54% | 50% |
2004 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 90% | 81% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 90% | 81% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 100% | 85% | 82% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | 83% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 89% | 83% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 85% | 84% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 100% | 85% | 83% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 60% | 39% | 33% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 100% | 88% | 80% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 91% | 77% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 93% | 87% | 77% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 86% | 80% | 77% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 83% | 80% | 79% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 83% | 79% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 94% | 82% | 79% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 73% | 84% | 79% |
2004 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 100% | 94% | 90% |
2007 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 100% | 98% | 91% |
2008 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 93% | 97% | 92% |
2009 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 91% | 92% |
2010 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 91% | 93% |
2011 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 95% | 92% |
2012 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 100% | 94% | 93% |
2013 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 93% | 94% | 92% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 70% | 70% | 71% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 69% | 69% | 74% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 79% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | 79% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | 80% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 81% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 56% | 56% | 52% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 87% | 85% | 82% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | 83% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 100% | 100% | 85% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93% | 93% | 82% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | 81% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | 85% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 81% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 61% | 61% | 36% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 73% | 73% | 72% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 75% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 77% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 79% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 81% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 79% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 59% | 59% | 54% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 82% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 84% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | 86% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | 84% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | 84% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | 87% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 84% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 47% | 47% | 35% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Dr Edward G Dyer School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.