2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 80 | 80 | 78 | 86 | 85 | 86 | 85 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,292 | 1,350 | 1,371 | 1,402 | 1,366 | 1,391 | 1,373 | |||||||
Grade 10: | 400 | 31.0% | 453 | 33.6% | 441 | 32.2% | 464 | 33.1% | 470 | 34.4% | 482 | 34.7% | 442 | 32.2% |
Grade 11: | 449 | 34.8% | 443 | 32.8% | 463 | 33.8% | 460 | 32.8% | 460 | 33.7% | 434 | 31.2% | 451 | 32.8% |
Grade 12: | 443 | 34.3% | 454 | 33.6% | 467 | 34.1% | 478 | 34.1% | 436 | 31.9% | 475 | 34.1% | 478 | 34.8% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 673 | 52.1% | 691 | 51.2% | 725 | 52.9% | 726 | 51.8% | 746 | 54.6% | 711 | 51.1% | 702 | 51.1% |
Female: | 619 | 47.9% | 659 | 48.8% | 646 | 47.1% | 676 | 48.2% | 612 | 44.8% | 672 | 48.3% | 667 | 48.6% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 5 | 0.4% | 5 | 0.4% | 7 | 0.5% | 8 | 0.6% | 6 | 0.4% | 4 | 0.3% | 6 | 0.4% |
Asian: | 171 | 13.2% | 177 | 13.1% | 179 | 13.1% | 186 | 13.3% | 177 | 13.0% | 192 | 13.8% | 185 | 13.5% |
Hispanic: | 25 | 1.9% | 31 | 2.3% | 28 | 2.0% | 25 | 1.8% | 16 | 1.2% | 21 | 1.5% | 13 | 0.9% |
Black: | 15 | 1.2% | 17 | 1.3% | 22 | 1.6% | 15 | 1.1% | 13 | 1.0% | 7 | 0.5% | 8 | 0.6% |
White: | 1,062 | 82.2% | 1,112 | 82.4% | 1,126 | 82.1% | 1,160 | 82.7% | 1,154 | 84.5% | 1,167 | 83.9% | 1,161 | 84.6% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 14 | 1.1% | 8 | 0.6% | 9 | 0.7% | 7 | 0.5% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 311 | 24.1% | 340 | 25.2% | 301 | 22.0% | 313 | 22.3% | 242 | 17.7% | 215 | 15.5% | 202 | 14.7% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 76 | 5.9% | 77 | 5.7% | 70 | 5.1% | 65 | 4.6% | 91 | 6.7% | 99 | 7.1% | 100 | 7.3% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 16.15 | 16.91 | 17.63 | 16.40 | 16.11 | 16.20 | 16.10 |
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
WKCE | ||||||
2004 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2005 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 73% | 73% | N/A |
2006 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2007 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2009 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2013 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 63% | 63% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 45% | 45% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 77% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 76% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 79% | N/A |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 82% | 83% | N/A |
2004 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | N/A |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | N/A |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* D C Everest High High School was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.