Claymont High School
4205 Indian Hill Rd Se
Uhrichsville OH, 44683, Tuscarawas County
Phone: 740-922-3471
Ranking: (472 out of 821, bottom 43%)*
Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Claymont City School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 42 | 41 | 41 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 41 | |||||||
Total Students: | 579 | 580 | 569 | 553 | 562 | 673 | 654 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 178 | 30.7% | 183 | 31.6% | 167 | 29.3% | 150 | 27.1% | 175 | 31.1% | 184 | 27.3% | 151 | 23.1% |
Grade 10: | 163 | 28.2% | 163 | 28.1% | 144 | 25.3% | 171 | 30.9% | 165 | 29.4% | 157 | 23.3% | 163 | 24.9% |
Grade 11: | 116 | 20.0% | 113 | 19.5% | 134 | 23.6% | 126 | 22.8% | 113 | 20.1% | 153 | 22.7% | 186 | 28.4% |
Grade 12: | 122 | 21.1% | 121 | 20.9% | 124 | 21.8% | 106 | 19.2% | 108 | 19.2% | 179 | 26.6% | 154 | 23.5% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 316 | 54.6% | 322 | 55.5% | 319 | 56.1% | 325 | 58.8% | 294 | 52.3% | 352 | 52.3% | 353 | 54.0% |
Female: | 263 | 45.4% | 258 | 44.5% | 250 | 43.9% | 228 | 41.2% | 247 | 44.0% | 306 | 45.5% | 289 | 44.2% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.2% |
Asian: | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.4% | 5 | 0.8% |
Hispanic: | 2 | 0.3% | 3 | 0.5% | 4 | 0.7% | 1 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.5% | 4 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.3% |
Black: | 6 | 1.0% | 4 | 0.7% | 2 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.4% | 4 | 0.7% | 8 | 1.2% | 10 | 1.5% |
White: | 546 | 94.3% | 549 | 94.7% | 540 | 94.9% | 530 | 95.8% | 541 | 96.3% | 650 | 96.6% | 628 | 96.0% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 24 | 4.1% | 24 | 4.1% | 22 | 3.9% | 19 | 3.4% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 239 | 41.3% | 238 | 41.0% | 224 | 39.4% | 262 | 47.4% | 230 | 40.9% | 222 | 33.0% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 48 | 8.3% | 60 | 10.3% | 44 | 7.7% | 47 | 8.5% | 47 | 8.4% | 42 | 6.2% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 13.70 | 14.15 | 13.88 | 13.33 | 13.38 | 16.00 | 16.10 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.2% | 64.2% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.6% | 77.6% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.5% | 82.5% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 81.9% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 87.1% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 79.6% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 88.6% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 84.6% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.9% | 95.9% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.7% | 90.7% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 91.3% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 79.2% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.2% | 81.2% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.1% | 77.1% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 86.1% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.5% | 82.5% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.4% | 88.4% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.1% | 67.1% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 76.9% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.8% | 67.8% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.8% | 74.8% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 78.6% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.5% | 67.5% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.5% | 83.5% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.9% | 80.9% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.6% | 81.6% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.7% | 80.7% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 78.6% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.9% | 74.9% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.8% | 76.8% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 86.4% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 73.9% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 82.9% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.0% | 89.0% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.0% | 87.0% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 88.8% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 92.5% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.3% | 86.3% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 85.2% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.3% | 94.3% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 85.4% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 91.1% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 93.4% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 97.3% | 97.3% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.8% | 91.8% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 86.7% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 92.9% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 93.3% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 95.4% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 94.8% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 94.9% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 94.9% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 87.3% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 92.9% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 92.6% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 94.1% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 94.8% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 96.4% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 88.6% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 79.8% | 79.8% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 90.4% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 87.5% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.0% | 91.0% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 93.5% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 92.4% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.7% | 82.7% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 91.1% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.9% | 91.9% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 92.1% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 93.5% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 93.5% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 96.2% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 90.2% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 95.3% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 94.8% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 97.4% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 97.4% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.1% | 97.1% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Claymont High School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.