Clay High School
5665 Seaman St
Oregon OH, 43616, Lucas County
Phone: 419-693-0665
Ranking: (522 out of 821, bottom 36%)*
Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Oregon City School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 79 | 80 | 82 | 82 | 83 | 94 | 95 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,249 | 1,231 | 1,211 | 1,250 | 1,254 | 1,274 | 1,244 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 314 | 25.1% | 326 | 26.5% | 315 | 26.0% | 311 | 24.9% | 294 | 23.4% | 311 | 24.4% | 323 | 26.0% |
Grade 10: | 323 | 25.9% | 305 | 24.8% | 307 | 25.4% | 309 | 24.7% | 316 | 25.2% | 323 | 25.4% | 322 | 25.9% |
Grade 11: | 580 | 46.4% | 308 | 25.0% | 292 | 24.1% | 317 | 25.4% | 322 | 25.7% | 335 | 26.3% | 318 | 25.6% |
Grade 12: | 32 | 2.6% | 292 | 23.7% | 297 | 24.5% | 313 | 25.0% | 322 | 25.7% | 305 | 23.9% | 281 | 22.6% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 646 | 51.7% | 644 | 52.3% | 627 | 51.8% | 652 | 52.2% | 641 | 51.1% | 655 | 51.4% | 630 | 50.6% |
Female: | 603 | 48.3% | 587 | 47.7% | 584 | 48.2% | 598 | 47.8% | 553 | 44.1% | 545 | 42.8% | 551 | 44.3% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 5 | 0.4% | 3 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% |
Asian: | 13 | 1.0% | 14 | 1.1% | 11 | 0.9% | 19 | 1.5% | 16 | 1.3% | 17 | 1.3% | 19 | 1.5% |
Hispanic: | 125 | 10.0% | 114 | 9.3% | 111 | 9.2% | 117 | 9.4% | 113 | 9.0% | 91 | 7.1% | 74 | 5.9% |
Black: | 23 | 1.8% | 20 | 1.6% | 19 | 1.6% | 21 | 1.7% | 17 | 1.4% | 14 | 1.1% | 8 | 0.6% |
White: | 1,037 | 83.0% | 1,024 | 83.2% | 1,013 | 83.6% | 1,039 | 83.1% | 1,054 | 84.1% | 1,084 | 85.1% | 1,082 | 87.0% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 1 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 45 | 3.6% | 54 | 4.4% | 53 | 4.4% | 52 | 4.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 460 | 36.8% | 428 | 34.8% | 382 | 31.5% | 366 | 29.3% | 363 | 28.9% | 259 | 20.3% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 90 | 7.2% | 107 | 8.7% | 97 | 8.0% | 105 | 8.4% | 137 | 10.9% | 120 | 9.4% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 15.72 | 15.47 | 14.84 | 15.22 | 15.17 | 13.50 | 13.10 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.8% | 73.8% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 87.5% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.4% | 80.4% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.5% | 86.5% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 83.6% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.9% | 84.9% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.6% | 81.6% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.5% | 82.7% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 81.8% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 85.4% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 84.6% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 94.7% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 90.9% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 87.5% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 87.5% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 87.1% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 86.4% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 90.6% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 91.6% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 89.2% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.4% | 77.4% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.5% | 72.5% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 76.9% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.2% | 77.2% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.7% | 80.7% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.5% | 76.5% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.2% | 74% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.8% | 76.8% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.2% | 82.2% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 85.9% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 76.9% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.2% | 78.2% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.4% | 80.4% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 85.2% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.7% | 80.9% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.2% | 82.2% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.3% | 84.3% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 88.9% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.9% | 84.9% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 89.4% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 85.2% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 91.6% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.4% | 84.4% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.2% | 91.3% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 89.6% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 86.8% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 92.4% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 90.1% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 94.4% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 92.7% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 93.5% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.3% | 90.3% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 94.1% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 92.1% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 92.9% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 93.4% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.4% | 97.4% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 94.5% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 95.2% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 87.5% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 89.4% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 87.5% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 91.1% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 90.1% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 86.9% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 87.5% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 89% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.4% | 88.4% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.1% | 89.1% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 92.8% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 93.4% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.7% | 88.7% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 90.1% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 92.3% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 94.1% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 92.9% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 95.4% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 95.2% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 94.2% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 94.8% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Clay High School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.