USA.com / Illinois / Ridge Farm, IL / 61870 / Public Schools / Chrisman-Scottland Jr High School / Test Performance

Chrisman-Scottland Jr High School, Test Performance

Basic InfoStudents and TeachersTest PerformanceSchool District

Year	Test	Grade	Measurement	Score	School District	State Average
ISAT
2007	Math	5th Grade	% met std	96.3%	96.3%	82.5%
2008	Math	5th Grade	% met std	91.6%	91.6%	81.3%
2009	Math	5th Grade	% met std	84.6%	84.6%	82.5%
2010	Math	5th Grade	% met std	86.6%	86.6%	83.4%
2011	Math	5th Grade	% met std	92%	92%	84.0%
2012	Math	5th Grade	% met std	85.7%	85.7%	83.6%
2007	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	85.2%	85.2%	69.7%
2008	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	87.5%	87.5%	73.6%
2009	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	69.2%	69.2%	73.5%
2010	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	73.3%	73.3%	74.7%
2011	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	88%	88%	76.4%
2012	Reading	5th Grade	% met std	78.6%	78.6%	77.8%
2006	Math	6th Grade	% met std	78.8%	78.8%	79.1%
2007	Math	6th Grade	% met std	96.1%	96.1%	81.4%
2008	Math	6th Grade	% met std	100%	100%	82.7%
2009	Math	6th Grade	% met std	92.3%	92.3%	82.4%
2010	Math	6th Grade	% met std	84.6%	84.6%	84.6%
2011	Math	6th Grade	% met std	100.0%	100.0%	83.9%
2012	Math	6th Grade	% met std	95.8%	95.8%	84.9%
2013	Math	6th Grade	% met std	67.9%	67.9%	59.6%
2006	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	66.6%	66.6%	72.8%
2007	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	61.5%	61.5%	73.4%
2008	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	76%	76%	79.1%
2009	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	84.6%	84.6%	79.9%
2010	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	76.9%	76.9%	81.2%
2011	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	79.3%	79.3%	84.1%
2012	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	83.4%	83.4%	81.7%
2013	Reading	6th Grade	% met std	53.6%	53.6%	58.9%
2006	Math	7th Grade	% met std	79.0%	79.0%	76.0%
2007	Math	7th Grade	% met std	80.0%	80.0%	79.4%
2008	Math	7th Grade	% met std	88.4%	88.4%	80.4%
2009	Math	7th Grade	% met std	95.6%	95.6%	82.7%
2010	Math	7th Grade	% met std	92.8%	92.8%	84.4%
2011	Math	7th Grade	% met std	88%	88%	84.3%
2012	Math	7th Grade	% met std	92.3%	92.3%	84.6%
2013	Math	7th Grade	% met std	65.2%	65.2%	59.1%
2006	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	68.5%	68.5%	72%
2007	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	60.0%	60.0%	73.3%
2008	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	65.4%	65.4%	77.7%
2009	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	82.6%	82.6%	77.5%
2010	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	85.7%	85.7%	77.4%
2011	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	72%	72%	78.8%
2012	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	76.9%	76.9%	78.1%
2013	Reading	7th Grade	% met std	69.5%	69.5%	58.5%
2003	Science	7th Grade	% met std	94.0%	94.0%	73.7%
2004	Science	7th Grade	% met std	94.1%	94.1%	74.4%
2005	Science	7th Grade	% met std	95.8%	95.8%	74.6%
2006	Science	7th Grade	% met std	94.7%	94.7%	80.9%
2007	Science	7th Grade	% met std	97.1%	97.1%	79.3%
2008	Science	7th Grade	% met std	96.1%	96.1%	79.2%
2009	Science	7th Grade	% met std	95.6%	95.6%	79.5%
2010	Science	7th Grade	% met std	92.8%	92.8%	82.4%
2011	Science	7th Grade	% met std	96%	96%	81.9%
2012	Science	7th Grade	% met std	88.5%	88.5%	79.9%
2013	Science	7th Grade	% met std	100.0%	100.0%	79.0%
2003	Math	8th Grade	% met std	76.9%	76.9%	53.1%
2004	Math	8th Grade	% met std	79.3%	79.3%	54.4%
2005	Math	8th Grade	% met std	77.8%	77.8%	54.3%
2006	Math	8th Grade	% met std	79.6%	79.6%	78.2%
2007	Math	8th Grade	% met std	72.5%	72.5%	81.3%
2008	Math	8th Grade	% met std	75.0%	75.0%	80.3%
2009	Math	8th Grade	% met std	92.3%	92.3%	81.7%
2010	Math	8th Grade	% met std	95.8%	95.8%	83.7%
2011	Math	8th Grade	% met std	92.8%	92.8%	86.3%
2012	Math	8th Grade	% met std	86.2%	86.2%	85.0%
2013	Math	8th Grade	% met std	58.4%	58.4%	58.9%
2003	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	80%	80%	63.7%
2004	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	75.9%	75.9%	67.1%
2005	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	85.8%	85.8%	72.8%
2006	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	77.2%	77.2%	79.2%
2007	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	80%	80%	81.7%
2008	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	75%	75%	81.4%
2009	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	69.2%	69.2%	83.6%
2010	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	79.2%	79.2%	84.1%
2011	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	100.0%	100.0%	85.0%
2012	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	82.7%	82.7%	86.2%
2013	Reading	8th Grade	% met std	70.8%	70.8%	59.8%

Some data by SchoolDigger.com.

* Chrisman-Scottland Jr High School, Test Performance was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.