USA.com / Alabama / Shelby County / Indian Springs Village, AL / Public Schools / Chelsea Intermediate School
Chelsea Intermediate School
2315 Hwy 39 Chelsea AL, 35043, Shelby County Phone: 205-682-7220 Ranking: (130 out of 1,064, top 12%)* Type: Regular Middle School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Grade 4 to Grade 5 School District: Shelby County School District Title I Eligible School: NA Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | NA | NA | 38 | 34 | 35 | 27 | 31 | 27 | ||||||
Total Students: | NA | NA | 701 | 648 | 652 | 615 | 583 | 525 | ||||||
Grade 4: | NA | NA | 369 | 52.6% | 318 | 49.1% | 331 | 50.8% | 321 | 52.2% | 291 | 49.9% | 276 | 52.6% |
Grade 5: | NA | NA | 332 | 47.4% | 330 | 50.9% | 321 | 49.2% | 294 | 47.8% | 292 | 50.1% | 249 | 47.4% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | NA | NA | 369 | 52.6% | 329 | 50.8% | 331 | 50.8% | 301 | 48.9% | 270 | 46.3% | 261 | 49.7% |
Female: | NA | NA | 332 | 47.4% | 319 | 49.2% | 321 | 49.2% | 304 | 49.4% | 305 | 52.3% | 260 | 49.5% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | NA | NA | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.3% | 3 | 0.5% | 4 | 0.7% | 4 | 0.7% | 2 | 0.4% |
Asian: | NA | NA | 10 | 1.4% | 13 | 2.0% | 16 | 2.5% | 13 | 2.1% | 8 | 1.4% | 4 | 0.8% |
Hispanic: | NA | NA | 15 | 2.1% | 14 | 2.2% | 18 | 2.8% | 14 | 2.3% | 11 | 1.9% | 15 | 2.9% |
Black: | NA | NA | 50 | 7.1% | 47 | 7.3% | 61 | 9.4% | 49 | 8.0% | 51 | 8.7% | 33 | 6.3% |
White: | NA | NA | 616 | 87.9% | 565 | 87.2% | 553 | 84.8% | 533 | 86.7% | 509 | 87.3% | 471 | 89.7% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | NA | NA | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | NA | NA | 10 | 1.4% | 7 | 1.1% | 1 | 0.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | NA | NA | 96 | 13.7% | 100 | 15.4% | 101 | 15.5% | 77 | 12.5% | 51 | 8.7% | 53 | 10.1% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | NA | NA | 30 | 4.3% | 33 | 5.1% | 19 | 2.9% | 19 | 3.1% | 18 | 3.1% | 27 | 5.1% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | NA | NA | 18.62 | 18.89 | 18.76 | 22.87 | 18.60 | 19.40 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
ADAW | ||||||
2004 | Grammar and Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 66.1% | 67.3% | 50.6% |
2005 | Grammar and Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 65.2% | 57.9% | 42.2% |
2006 | Grammar and Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 74.6% | 57.7% | 45% |
2008 | Grammar and Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 35.62% | 41.11% | 37.08% |
2009 | Grammar and Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 58.99% | 48.79% | 37.25% |
2004 | Holistic Composition | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 68.2% | 57.3% |
2005 | Holistic Composition | 5th Grade | % met std | 75% | 72.6% | 58.7% |
2006 | Holistic Composition | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.7% | 71.3% | 64% |
2008 | Holistic Composition | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.31% | 67.86% | 62.46% |
2009 | Holistic Composition | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.69% | 70.63% | 64.88% |
2004 | Sentence Formation | 5th Grade | % met std | 57% | 63.4% | 48.9% |
2005 | Sentence Formation | 5th Grade | % met std | 61.7% | 57% | 44.4% |
2006 | Sentence Formation | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.5% | 58% | 48.1% |
2008 | Sentence Formation | 5th Grade | % met std | 48.06% | 47.98% | 43.41% |
2009 | Sentence Formation | 5th Grade | % met std | 57.55% | 50.48% | 43.74% |
2004 | Writing Mechanics | 5th Grade | % met std | 57.7% | 62% | 47% |
2005 | Writing Mechanics | 5th Grade | % met std | 60% | 55.4% | 42.6% |
2006 | Writing Mechanics | 5th Grade | % met std | 68.1% | 57.1% | 48.1% |
2008 | Writing Mechanics | 5th Grade | % met std | 43.77% | 47.62% | 39.83% |
2009 | Writing Mechanics | 5th Grade | % met std | 57.19% | 50.74% | 40.59% |
ARMT | ||||||
2005 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 79.5% | 78.2% | 74.1% |
2006 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 84.6% | 77.7% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 86.4% | 81% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 89.1% | 83.6% |
2004 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 77% | 71.9% |
2005 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 78.6% | 74% |
2006 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 84% | 77.9% | 77.9% |
2007 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.77% | 81.91% | 78.31% |
2008 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.52% | 79.31% | 78.93% |
2009 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.54% | 79.85% | 79.12% |
2010 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.73% | 85.74% | 81.26% |
2011 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.36% | 87.87% | 82.42% |
2012 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.41% | 91.04% | 85.24% |
2004 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 85.4% | 76.9% |
2005 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.9% | 88.7% | 83.3% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 87.7% | 84.4% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.33% | 90.59% | 85.01% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.68% | 91.87% | 86.09% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.94% | 89.97% | 86.5% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.73% | 90.39% | 86.69% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.37% | 92.46% | 87.93% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 90.3% | 88.16% |
2005 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 80.7% | 71.8% |
2006 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 81.5% | 76.5% |
2007 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.95% | 79.13% | 77.26% |
2008 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.42% | 80.69% | 77.97% |
2009 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.41% | 84.67% | 79.94% |
2010 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.9% | 85.43% | 82.61% |
2011 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 97.14% | 94.44% | 88.95% |
2012 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 97.84% | 95.04% | 91.32% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.5% | 86.7% | 80.9% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93% | 87% | 80.7% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.44% | 88.11% | 84.6% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 87.72% | 84.37% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.85% | 89.09% | 84.65% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.29% | 88.12% | 85.64% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.57% | 92.93% | 88.59% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.53% | 91.01% | 88.88% |
ASA | ||||||
2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.89% | 78.88% | 69.84% |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.37% | 81.28% | 73.2% |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.12% | 80.89% | 77.35% |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.26% | 84.19% | 78.77% |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 83.53% | 80.09% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Chelsea Intermediate School was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.